StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...

The Anti-Federalists Objections to the Constitution - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
Your name The Anti-Federalists objections to the Constitution Those who sought the endorsement of the United States constitution between the year 1787 and 1788 referred to themselves as the “Federalists”…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91.9% of users find it useful
The Anti-Federalists Objections to the Constitution
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "The Anti-Federalists Objections to the Constitution"

Download file to see previous pages

The Anti-federalists believed that the power of the government should be concentrated in the legislature since it was the most democratic branch. They maintained that such a government offered the United States citizens the best protection for their essential rights. The Anti-federalist argued that the only way to ensure there existed democracy was through the allocation of power through particular texts. Therefore, they feared that the constitution that was being endorsed by the federalists delegated excess powers to the central government instead of these powers going to the states.

They also pointed out that there was allocation of more authority to the judiciary and executive at the expense of the congress. It was explicitly clear in their minds that the federalists and their supporters were threatening the freedoms that Americans had defended against the Britain. Brutus incorporated these ideas into his attack against the proposed constitution. He suggests that a large republic would not succeed in a large country like the United States since it comprises of citizens who are diverse in many ways.

According to him, such diversity would interfere with the operations and smooth running of the central government since many opinions and ideas would clash. Brutus believes that a republic can work in a small society like a state (Storing 37). Brutus also argued that the liberties of the US citizens were in danger since the federal government was being given a lot of powers that can be misused for personal gains. He gave examples of Britain and Rome where power had been misused and advised Americans not to follow the same trend.

The freedom of the commonwealth was denied and their constitution overturned by their strong army which had been given powers. Julius Cesar who was appointed to lead the command capitalized on the loopholes in the constitution and changed it from a free republic into despotism. He also pointed out that the fear from a large standing army was that the rulers may use them to promote their personal ambitions. They could also overturn the governments’ constitutional powers and gain their own powers to enable them dictate the US people.

Brutus and other Anti-federalists advocates looked at themselves as the defenders of a self government that was going to offer outstanding leadership to the people of America. They supported leadership in small republics or the states with the rulers accessing limited powers that can not be misused. By giving examples of Rome and Britain where power had been misused, Brutus wanted the Federalists to learn from other countries and make adequate changes to the constitution. James Madison opposed the objections from the Anti-federalists by arguing that the government had to be designed to stop the politicians and the people from using it for their own selfish gains.

He had contributed immensely to the constitution and this is why he countered the objections from the Anti-federalists strongly. Among the many common features in the constitution was the idea of a balanced government system where the national authority was limited and reserving definite powers to the people through the local government. Madison also made other key contributions to the constitution such as the creation of a national legislature and the national chief executive. His strongest argument in support for the constitution was that, it had come up with a strong government capable of controlling the

...Download file to see next pages Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“The Anti-Federalists Objections to the Constitution Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/history/1445618-the-anti-federalists-had-a-variety-of-objections
(The Anti-Federalists Objections to the Constitution Essay)
https://studentshare.org/history/1445618-the-anti-federalists-had-a-variety-of-objections.
“The Anti-Federalists Objections to the Constitution Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1445618-the-anti-federalists-had-a-variety-of-objections.
  • Cited: 1 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Anti-Federalists Objections to the Constitution

Federalist Papers Number 10 and 51

The overall purpose was not only to reshape the constitution of the country but also to ensure the ratification of the US as a combined State.... Out of all these articles, federalist paper 10 and 51 are considered as most important papers outlining the broader scope and structure of the constitution of the country besides presenting plausible arguments in favor of the formation of one large State.... anti-federalists also argued that a diverse republic would be difficult to survive and therefore advocated giving more powers to the States based on the notion of locality....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Were the Anti-Federalists Correct Was the 1787 Constitution a Betrayal of the American Revolution

the anti-federalists objections pushed federalists to include a bill of rights to guarantee civil liberties to the people.... The push and the predicted effects of the constitution however created opposing forces to the ratification of the U.... The federalists strongly supported the constitution and its formation of the central government because the formerly relied confederation articles were ineffective, and a strong national government would be able to control uncooperative states and excess powers of foreign policies that affected the U....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

Fallacies of the Anti-Federalists in the British Empire

In our own time, where the government regulates such areas as public education, the insurance of bank accounts, the permitted forms of marriage, and other areas that the framers of the constitution may never have imagined that their government would be asked to oversee.... The paper 'Fallacies of the anti-federalists in the British Empire' concerns the mostly rural culture, with only the faintest signs of political order, the early nation teetered on the brink of disunion....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

The Problems of Independence

The federal entity created by the constitution is the dominant feature of the American governmental system.... nbsp;… After having a detailed overview of the history of the United States of America and its constitution, it is not very difficult to say that without this constitution the United States can get such an organized political, social and economic structure....
8 Pages (2000 words) Case Study

Debate and Conflict Between Federalists and Anti Federalists

nbsp; Those opposed to the constitution, the Anti-Federalists which included John Hancock, Patrick Henry, and Samuel Adams, also wrote a series of arguments now known as the Anti-Federalist papers.... the anti-federalists could be more accurately described as federalists because they preferred the government to be a federation of autonomous states.... constitution was proposed and drafted at a convention convened in Philadelphia in 1787 by a distinguished group of influential men headed by Alexander Hamilton....
9 Pages (2250 words) Coursework

Federalist and Antifederalist

This is the same argument which was also built upon by the anti-federalists who pointed out on more than one occasion about the new Federal system being unwieldy and hence there is no need for a Federation per se.... While the anti-federalists warned about the concentration of power in the hands of a few, the Federalists proposed the formation of a new system that would be powerful enough to achieve their objectives of true Republican government.... However, the anti-federalists were quite adamant that such concentration of power would lead to the very excesses that the Federalists were warning against....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Federalism: An Effective Mechanism of Division of Power

The division of power in federalism is explicitly stated in the constitution of the federation and thus the right of government of the central government and the states is safeguarded by the constitution and a rational autonomy is granted to the states and provinces forming the federation.... For example in the federation countries like United States and Germany the powers about which the constitution is silent and are not explicitly stated to rest with central or the provincial/state government are retained by the state governments whereas in India, Canada and Argentina such powers are retained by the central government....
11 Pages (2750 words) Research Paper

Ideals of Civil Liberty and Rebuilding American Democracy

While the constitution does not mandate a two-party system, “winner take all” representation does discourage third-party candidates from attaining office, as do the discriminatory ballot measures that restrict ballot access to third parties.... hellip; The paper starts with the statement that the anti-federalists in American history opposed aspects of the U.... today represents a system of government that the anti-federalists specifically warned against in the founding of the United States through the Constitutional Convention, “Bill of Rights” negotiation, and state ratification process....
26 Pages (6500 words) Term Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us