StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Comparing Rawls and Hayek - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary

This paper 'Comparing Rawls and Hayek' tells us that Friedrich Hayek was a philosopher who was from Britain. The majority of his writings were from the experience of world war I since he had served as a soldier during the war. Hayek developed the theory of freedom from his need to control the mistakes he did.
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.4% of users find it useful
Comparing Rawls and Hayek
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Comparing Rawls and Hayek"

Comparing Rawls and Hayek Friedrich Hayek was a philosopher who was from Britain. Majority of his writings were from the experience of his world war one, since he had served as a soldier during the war. Hayek developed the theory of freedom from his need to control the mistakes he did and witnessed during the First World War. Although he acknowledges that freedom had a lot of definition, he emphasizes that the freedom he was talking about in his writing was freedom that was without any kind of coercion. Hayek in his writings shares his ideology that individuals are caught amidst freedom by reiterating that individuals are either free or not free. Hayek highlights that freedom entailed acting on an individual’s own free will and not on the will or command of others or situations. He covers all the types of freedom that he experienced in the First World War that is political freedom, personal freedom and economic freedom. On the other hand, John Rawls was a philosopher who originated from America and fought or participated in the Second World War. He was responsible for developing the theory of justice which was a concept of ethical, rationality, law, equity and fairness (Bellamy). Rawls argues that justice is fairness and the same justice is responsible for the existence of liberty within the society. Rawls believes that for social institutions to be operational or function properly, justice is necessary in forming the foundations, defining the base and also veiling the position of ignorance within the society. Hayek and Rawls both supported liberalism in their different writings and speech. They talked in unison that people were free to exercise their ideas without barriers as long as their idea were not ill motivated or malicious in any way and that the state was there to support them and ensure that their rights, that is of freedom of speech, were practiced and equally enjoyed by all individuals from different classes, ages, ethnical backgrounds and races. Hayek and Rawls both agreed that the government was created for the citizens, by the citizens and to serve the citizens and rebuffed other notion of the other way round that the citizens were meant to serve the government. They were both liberal as they preached the principles of justice, freedom and equality to the public as they both advocated for basic rights such like education, food, shelter, medication and clothing to all citizens. Both Hayek and Rawls were using the society as their main source of reference in their various thoughts and intransient differences, thereby making the citizens the centre of their struggles for freedom and justice. This is as per what they experienced in world war one and world war two respectively. The various ideas they tried to put in action were all directed towards the unification of their different ideologies, in favor of the citizens, on how things are done or should be carried out within the society (Hayek 78). Both Hayek and Rawls place emphasis on Rawls theory of the veil of ignorance intended to make us blind to our unique differences as human beings. They both campaign on the interests of democracy as they try to shun the inhabitants of a strong and peacefully democracy. They both argue that in the interest of democracy, ideologies should be placed together to accommodate the different thoughts and lifestyles of individuals coming from different backgrounds and possessing different ideologies in the society. This is because the society consists if unique human beings with unique qualities, backgrounds, class and preferences. However, Rawls and Hayek do not come to an agreement thus do not resolve their arguments in order to find solutions and how solutions are reached in different situations. In fact, they completely clash and each has their own viewpoint of the solution to their matching theories and ideologies. Rawls argues that agreements on particular matters can be reached whereas Hayek does not believe that this can happen. Hayek believes that the presence of pluralism in state can not allow for satisfactory solutions to issues affecting individuals within the society. He believes that this decision does not always echo the voice of the majority rather they are views of the selected few within the society who are mainly the high class individuals. According to him, this will mean injustice to the middle and more so the low class. Hayek and Rawls are also strong in their ideas of moral self-government. They do not agree on the fact the state or government should posses the authority to determine the ethical principles required or involved in contemporary issues in the society. In addition, Hayek’s opinion on this is focused around the misinformation coming from regimes which took power in unlawful procedures or channels. The point of disagreement between Rawls and Hayek is centered on the economic distribution of resources among citizens in the society especially on an equal basis. Hayek does not think that the distribution of wealth is possible in the presence of the principle that economics makes things complicated. By this, the philosopher means that economic planning is a tedious and demanding activity where there are specific risks like power concentration which was a threat during the economic planning process. He, therefore, strongly argues this point because he believes that individual’s economic progress is not reflected in the economic policies produced by the state in the society. On the other hand, Rawls idea on this same issue is totally different from Hayek since he totally believes in his theory of justice and political liberalism in the society. This ideology was a success on his part because he was campaigning for the America’s census but when it came to the fact that principle of economics makes things complicated, as put across by Hayek, they could not come to an understanding as they had different facts. Therefore, each individual stuck to his opinion on the principle of whether principles of economics made things complicated for justice, freedom and liberalism in the society. The major difference that can be notated between Hayek and Rawls is that Hayek treats economic matters as those of morals. However, Rawls believes that it is individual’s wide-ranging morals that brings rise to the idea of goods distribution among the citizens themselves. Hayek does not believe in the existence of common good, therefore, believes that economic distribution cannot be accurate as it is clouded by different intentions, of the citizens, which are always not for the common good of the citizens of a particular state or the society, but for particular citizens in a state. Hayek believed that the fairest way of administering to the society economic goods was through competition. He believed that competition would be the most open and fairest to all individuals at different levels in the society. Rawls believed the opposite way, in that he believed in the power of completion when allowed to function like a mechanism (Rawls 46). Both Hayek and Rawls believed that inequality in the society was responsible for the growth of new habits that was important to the entire society as these habits would lead to the emergence of security measures by different individuals like increasing their aggregate wealth and increasing the innovation in the area. However, Rawls does not deviate from their popular ideology that the benefits of a competitive economy would explain the democratic system in the contemporary world. All in all, even though both Hayek and Rawls have differing views to the solution of equality, justice and freedom in the society, they both strongly believe that these three elements must be present in any society to ensure equity and peace together with economic growth in any society. Works Cited Bellamy, Richard. Liberalism and Pluralism: Towards a Politics of Compromise. London: Routledge, 1999. Print. Hayek, Friedrich A. Social Justice, Socialism & Democracy: Three Australian Lectures. Turramurra, N.S.W: Centre for Independent Studies, 1979. Print. Rawls, John. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993. Print. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Comparing Rawls and Hayek Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/history/1490196-comparing-rawls-and-hayek
(Comparing Rawls and Hayek Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 Words)
https://studentshare.org/history/1490196-comparing-rawls-and-hayek.
“Comparing Rawls and Hayek Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1490196-comparing-rawls-and-hayek.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Comparing Rawls and Hayek

Hardings Understanding of the Role of Values

Consequently, there are two such philosophers who provide differing points of view and understandings; Haack and Harding, who works and opinions/ beliefs form the basis of this essay in comparing and contrasting their understanding of the roles of values of science.... Instructor Date On many occurrences, there are different scientists who bear different opinions on the belief systems of how science works or should work in its values....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

LEGAL ASPECTS OF HOTEL MANAGEMENT

Legal Aspects of Hospitality Management (Name) (University) Labor & Employment Laws in the Hospitality Industry Introduction One of the most pressing legal issues facing the hospitality industry is labor and employment practice.... The administration of human resources in hotels offers special legal and ethical challenges, especially due to highly diverse personnel backgrounds, distinct organizational structures, and specific roles....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Cloud computing Risk or Opportunity

Cloud computing has changed dramatically the ways in which organizations and individuals communicate, collaborate and compute.... The concept of cloud computing… ensures a cost–effective transformation of utility computing principle that allows users and providers a convenient access to resources in a self-service and ‘pay as you go fashion'....
14 Pages (3500 words) Research Paper

Dave Matthews Funny the Way It Is

The refrain inculcates a mood departure by altering the melody and the notions depicted in the song, comparing them to the present day life (Wvu.... This is the foremost single released from DMB's studio album.... This track if pitted with overt tragedy, probably due to the previous year's demise of Groogrux king, who was… Notably, his passionate contributions are expressed in this moody yet tempo-up song....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

The Impacts of Mobile Devices on Cyber Security

The study “The Impacts of Mobile Devices on Cyber Security” aims at finding out the impacts of mobile devices such as smartphones, tablets, and iPads, on cybersecurity.... This is because the increase in the number of mobile phone users to 4 billion worldwide also increases the risks....
8 Pages (2000 words) Assignment

Statistical Reasoning

Strategic communication involves communicating of concepts, processes, or even data with an intention to satisfy an organization's long-term strategy.... Statistics is important aspect of this communication because it involves learning from data, measuring and communicating… Statistics is an important aspect as it allows effective communication....
4 Pages (1000 words) Assignment

Modern Ideas of Conservatism

hellip; According to Kukathas (2003), political liberalism is a modification to John rawls's theory of justice.... The author of the "Modern Ideas of Conservatism" paper describes what it is that conservatism (a political and social philosophy) is trying to conserve.... The author also describes and analyzes the relationship between welfare and individual rights in Political Liberalism....
6 Pages (1500 words) Assignment

Comparing and Contrasting the Implication of Rawlss and Hayeks Theory of Justice on Economic Policy

Basically, the difference between rawls and hayek is that the former focuses on microeconomics whereas the other on macroeconomics; however, both of them included in their discussion property-owning democracy and market socialism in a minimal fashion, while disregarding capitalism.... This coursework describes comparing and contrasting the implication of Rawls's and hayek's theory of justice on economic policy.... This essay will review the similarity and differences between the implications of Rawls's and hayek's theory of justice on economic policy....
8 Pages (2000 words) Coursework
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us