StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

What are the pros and cons of challenges to the appointment of arbitrators - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The arbitrator decides on the issue in concerning the dispute, and he or she enforces a binding decision on the parties. Therefore, arbitration is undertaken due to a certain business contract; hence, offering arbitration for is situations where the disputes arise. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.5% of users find it useful
What are the pros and cons of challenges to the appointment of arbitrators
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "What are the pros and cons of challenges to the appointment of arbitrators"

? The Pros and Cons of Challenges to the Appointment of Arbitrators The Pros and Cons of Challenges to the Appointment of Arbitrators Introduction Arbitration is considered an alternative method of resolving disputes, which is preferred to litigation, though there are several forms of alternatives of dispute resolution with merits and demerits1. Nevertheless, the solicitor takes the vital role of advising on all possible methods that can be applied in dispute resolution, prior to recommendation of relevant in a given situation. In this case, arbitration is an alternative for resolving disputes in a situation that a third party reaches a decision, which is binding upon the parties to the dispute. The arbitrator decides on the issue in concerning the dispute, and he or she enforces a binding decision on the parties2. Therefore, arbitration is undertaken due to a certain business contract; hence, offering arbitration for is situations where the disputes arise. Moreover, arbitration is considered to be the best suited for facilitating a settlement between parties in dispute. The paper will focus on exploring pros and cons of challenges to the appointment of arbitrators in the perspectives of parties bringing the challenge, opposing party in the disputes and the arbitrator whose appointment is be. In the process of arbitration, the parties involved in the dispute agree to submit their dispute to the neutral arbitrator, instead of a court3. Therefore, the arbitrator acts like a judge, whereby he or she listens to the testimony, reviews evidence and enters a binding ruling. After the decision in made, the prevailing parties may deicide filing in court to convent the award to a judgment4. On the other hand, the prevailing party may be raise claims that the judgment, which was provided, and the process involved binding arbitration require enforcement through the courts. Pros of arbitration One of the pros of arbitration is being quicker compared to litigation, and this becomes a debatable topic with arbitration tending to similar to a formal process of the court5. Therefore, once the party bringing the challenge and the opposing party in the disputes enters into arbitration they do not have to wait for the Court to add them in to a list, which is over clouded6. The parties have a chance of acquiring a suitable arbitrator, who is available, and they are make to decide on the time of arbitration. On the other hand, the decision made during the arbitration is binding to the party bringing the challenge and the opposing party in the disputes. However, there are some of other forms of ADR, which are non-binding; hence, they facilitate failure of the arbitration, despite the cost. In this case, once the arbitration is submitted there are expectations of definitive results. Arbitration is considered faster and less formal compared to the Courts process since the appointments are planned in a way that establishes a mutual convenience among the party bringing the challenge, opposing party in the disputes and the arbitrator. However, in the courts situation, the plan is dictated by the Court calendar, hence, in arbitration there is a chance of deciding on the duration, time, which is to be spent by the arbitrator in their case7. The party bringing the challenge and the opposing party in the disputes have a chance of appointing somebody who they are familiar with in a situation of a dispute. Therefore, the arbitrator relates the process of arbitration to an industry normal practice. The party bringing the challenge, opposing party in the disputes and the arbitrator are able to include the clause in contracts sue to the likelihood of reaming confidential, unlike the disputes in the courts. Therefore, arbitration facilitates maintenance of the business relationship between the party bringing the challenge and the opposing party in the disputes8. Given that arbitration can lead to a resolution of a dispute faster than litigation, it is considered less costly than litigation since the process is more streamlined. On the other hand, the parties involved have an opportunity to select an arbitrator with specialized knowledge. For instance, in situations where there is a home inspection related dispute, the party bringing the challenge and the opposing party in the disputes may select an arbitrator with an experience in contract law and industry of home inspection. Furthermore, there is privacy involved, whereby the documents from the arbitration process are not disposed to the public. Lastly, the situations of binding arbitration, there are difficulties involved in overturning the arbitrator’s decision, and there is no long appearing process. Cons of arbitration The cons of arbitration relates to binding of parties, whereby in a situation where the arbitrator is known, he or she may decide the fate that reduces the chance of approaching settlement, thus making the arbitration to be conducted like a court hearing. However, there are situation not taken as mediation since the parties are unlikely to have binding ruling, thus failing to discuss their weakness related to their case and this contributes to failure in reaching an agreement9. The other con relates to the costs of the arbitration process, whereby it becomes similar to the court proceedings in terms of the submission of evidence and use of experts. Therefore, the legal fee is as much as the full court hearing and the costs involve charges on an hourly basis for the arbitrator’s time10. The contract signed by the parties and the arbitrator’s settlement determines the authority of the arbitrator, whereby in some situation it cannot be appealed. There is limited right to engage in discovery such as taking deposition, issues interrogatories, requesting documents and issuing subpoenas since the arbitration is a private issue that is not within the traditional court system. Moreover, lack of proper drafting of the contract the parties result to having an arbitrator having insignificant expertise in the field of interest. The other limitation is that there is no right to jury trial in arbitration, and there is an impossibility of seeking a review of the arbitrator’s decision. Therefore, in some situation the court may fail to overturn the arbitrator’s decision if the arbitrator failed to apply the law to the fact of the case11. Furthermore, the jurisdiction do not expect the arbitrator to be a lawyer or legal education; thus it may result to parities having a lawyer arbitrator, hence complicating the attempts of interpreting the complicated legal documents, statues and reported courts decisions. The other con relates to the fact that arbitration is in two elements of binding and non-binding, whereby non-binding arbitration has an effect similar to its binding counterpart. In this case, the parties involved are expected to agree on the binding arbitration, thus becoming complicated in some situations such as when, there is signing of inspection agreement12. Therefore, in this situation arbitration is considered an oppressive provision since the non-binding arbitration offers the litigant a chance. In a situation where there are several parities in dispute, arbitration is not suitable since it is common in constructions claims involving a single dispute such as between the employer and employee, a contractor and subcontractor, supplier and consultant13. Moreover, there are contracts, which dictate the arbitration while others do not since there is a likelihood of problems arising in the process of trying to make the parties fall in a parallel dispute in a situation involving different forums and results. There is no possibility of joining other parties in arbitration unless the contract of an arbitration contract with the agreement is provided. Unlike litigation, arbitration suffers many restrictions, whereby the multi-party disputes in arbitration requires drafting an agreement, which entails certain institutional rules. Finally, arbitrations clause offers the arbitrator authority to order the losing party to incur the cost of arbitration and expenses and fee for the attorney of the prevailing party14. Therefore, the contract specifies the party that will serve as the arbitrator and in a situation where it fails to do so; the arbitrator is chosen where the party bringing the challenge and the opposing party in the disputes are unable to agree on an arbitrator. Furthermore, there are contracts that are prepared by the national organization, thus requiring arbitration to be conducted by American Arbitration Association, Inspection Arbitration Services or a similar national organization. These require the parties involved to familiarize themselves with arbitration rules and fee structures of the organization prior to the agreement that binds them in the provision15. In conclusion, the essay has explored issues related to pros and cons of challenges to the appointment of arbitrators in the perspectives of parties bringing the challenge, opposing party in the disputes and the arbitrator whose appointment is be. Some of the significant issues discussed in the essay relating to the pros are the ability to choose an arbitrator with the relevant expertise, and the process being faster. On the other hand, the cons of arbitration relate to the cost of the process, which is charged hourly, and it is not suitable to multi-party disputes, and the entire discussion was based on the perspective of the party bringing the challenge, opposing party in the disputes and the arbitrator whose appointment is be. References Blackaby, N. & Partasides, C., (2009), Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration, London: Oxford University Press  Coppo, B., (2010), Comparing institutional arbitration rules: differences and similarities in a developing international practice, Int. A.L.R., 13(3), 100-110 Dezalay, Y. & Garth, B., (1996), Becoming an Arbitrator: Building and Exchanging National and International Symbolic Capital in, Dealing in Virtue, Chicago: Chicago University Press Dezalay, Y. & Garth, B., (1996), Dealing in Virtue: International Commercial Arbitration and the Construction of a Transnational Legal Order, Chicago: Chicago University Press Hanotiau, B., (2011), International Arbitration in a Global Economy: The Challenges of the Future in (ed), Journal of International Arbitration, Kluwer Law International, 28(2) pp. 89 – 103 Kozlowska, D., (2011), Privilege in the multi-jurisdictional area of international commercial arbitration, International Arbitration Law Review, 14(4) 128 LexisNexis, (2012), The pros and cons of arbitration, Elsevier, Retrieved on 12 November 2012  Lanfang, F., (2010), Public Policy as a Bar to Enforcement of International Arbitral Awards: A Review of the Chinese Approach in William W. Park (ed), Arbitration International, Kluwer Law International, 26(2), 301-311 Mutasim, A., (2011), Enforceability of Arbitration Clauses in Online Business-to-Consumer Contracts in (ed), Journal of International Arbitration, Kluwer Law International, 28(1) pp. 67 – 79 Morton, P., (2010), Can a World Exist Where Expedited Arbitration Becomes the Default Procedure? Arbitration International, Kluwer Law International, 26(1) pp. 103 – 113 Moss, G., (2010), Revision of the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules: further steps, Int. A.L.R., 13(3), 96-99 Najar, J., (2009), Inside Out: A User's Perspective on Challenges in International Arbitration, Arbitration International, Kluwer Law International, 25(4) pp. 515 – 527 Scherer, M., (2011), Court proceedings in violation of an arbitration agreement: arbitral jurisdiction to issue anti-suit injunction and award damages for breach of the arbitration agreement, Int. A.L.R., 14(2), 43-46 Sammartano, M. (2011), Costs Awards in Arbitration in (ed), Journal of International Arbitration, Kluwer Law International, 28 (2) 113 - 114 Waincymer, J. (2010), Reconciling Conflicting Rights in International Arbitration: The Right to Choice of Counsel and the Right to an Independent and Impartial Tribunal, Arbitration International, Kluwer Law International, 26(4), 597 – 623  Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“What are the pros and cons of challenges to the appointment of Essay”, n.d.)
What are the pros and cons of challenges to the appointment of Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1461428-what-are-the-pros-and-cons-of-challenges-to-the
(What Are the Pros and Cons of Challenges to the Appointment of Essay)
What Are the Pros and Cons of Challenges to the Appointment of Essay. https://studentshare.org/law/1461428-what-are-the-pros-and-cons-of-challenges-to-the.
“What Are the Pros and Cons of Challenges to the Appointment of Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1461428-what-are-the-pros-and-cons-of-challenges-to-the.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF What are the pros and cons of challenges to the appointment of arbitrators

Issues Relating to Arbitration in Outsourcing Contracts

As per section 48 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1966 of India, the ground for setting aside for a foreign arbitral award would be any of the following: • If a party to the contract was under some incapability; or • Under the governing law, if the arbitration agreement was not valid; • No proper notice of either the arbitral proceedings or the appointment of the arbitrator was given to any of the parties; • If the award exceeds its scope of the submission; • If the award is pertaining to a dispute not agreed by or not falling within the purview of the subject matter of the arbitration....
16 Pages (4000 words) Essay

Pre-appointment Interviews and International Commercial Arbitration

Also, the AAA/ABA Code of Ethics for Arbitrators in Commercial Disputes stated: When the appointment of a... The mechanism is crucial in requiring and fulfilling an obligation on the part of the prospective arbitrators to disclose information, which should determine or influence their selection.... In addition, it is also a tool by which parties to arbitration can select arbitrators who are perceived to favour their case.... As a matter of fact, ICDR identify it as the exception to its rule, prohibiting arbitration counsels from communicating with arbitrators....
12 Pages (3000 words) Assignment

Sexual Harassment, Arbitrators and Vacated Awards

hellip; Courts will vacate and refuse to confirm an arbitration Award if fraud, corruption or misconduct by the arbitrators is established.... Clearly, arbitrators possess no independent powers beyond what the parties confer on them through their contracts and the Courts in general, have allowed arbitrators to make crucial inferences regarding the possible future conduct of grievants when they determine their awards.... The Labor law policy favors disputes going to arbitration and the Collective Bargaining Agreement or CBAs usually authorize arbitrators to reinstate employees....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Right of the Parties to Challenge an Arbitral Award on Grounds of Error of Law

Both the aspect of the decision is analysed with justification to extract the… Under Section 10, an award may be vacated where: it was procured by fraud, corruption or undue means; there was evident partiality or corruption in some or all of the arbitrators; the arbitrators were guilty of misconduct in Pursuant to Section 11, an award may be modified for: evident material miscalculation; evident material mistake; dealing with matters not submitted to the arbitrators; or imperfections not affecting the merits of the award....
13 Pages (3250 words) Essay

Party-Selected Judges and Arbitrators in International Proceedings

hellip; The paper tells that in internal legal and arbitral proceedings, party-selected and party-appointed arbitrators and judges play distinctive useful and practical roles.... On the other hand, under the Rules of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce, an international representative body of the largest group of business organizations located in more than 130 countries, 1 the parties select their arbitrators, a practice mirrored in other arbitration proceedings, making it a defining characteristic of the process....
10 Pages (2500 words) Research Paper

The Arbitrators Duty of Impartiality and Independence

The International Commercial Congress of Arbitration clarified that arbitration follows the theory of arbitration that the parties have the right to control the process and maintain that right during the process; and that the parties' agreement to settle their disputes entails allowing the arbitrator or arbitrators to control the process.... Home process reality, the ICCA stated that it is the State which has sole control of the arbitral process because it provides the power to the parties as well as the arbitrators....
12 Pages (3000 words) Dissertation
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us