StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Administrative law theories - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
Administrative law is the body of law that arises from the activities of administrative agencies of government. Government agency action may include rulemaking, adjudication, or the enforcement of a exact regulatory agenda. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.4% of users find it useful
Administrative law theories
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Administrative law theories"

Administrative Law Administrative law is the body of law that arises from the activities of administrative agencies of government. Government agency action may include rulemaking, adjudication, or the enforcement of a exact regulatory agenda. Administrative law is considered a branch of public law. Administrative law deals with the decision-making of administrative units of government that are part of a state regulatory scheme in such areas as international trade, manufacturing, the environment, taxation, broadcasting, immigration and transport. Administrative law extended greatly during the twentieth century, as legislative bodies world-wide created more government agencies to regulate the increasingly complex social, economic and political spheres of human interaction (Administrative law, 2006). Most countries that follow the principles of common law have developed procedures for judicial review that limit the reviewability of decisions made by administrative law bodies. Often these procedures are joined with legislation or other common law doctrines that set up principles for proper rulemaking (Administrative law, 2006). Administrative law may also apply to review of decisions of so-called quasi-public bodies, such as non-profit corporations, disciplinary boards, and other decision-making bodies that influence the legal rights of members of a particular group or entity (Administrative law, 2006). While administrative decision-making bodies are often controlled by larger governmental units, their decisions could be reviewed by a court of general jurisdiction under some principle of judicial review based upon due process (United States) or fundamental justice (Canada) (Administrative law, 2006).The range of judicial review may be limited to certain questions of fairness, or whether the administrative action is ultra vires. In terms of ultra vires actions in the broad sense, a reviewing court may set aside an administrative decision if it is patently unreasonable (under Canadian law), Wednesbury unreasonable (under British law), or arbitrary and capricious under (U.S. Administrative Procedure Act and New York State law) (Administrative law, 2006). The traditional approach The traditional view of administrative law is that it should aim to reinforce the rule of law, and ensure the liability of Executive government to the will of Parliament and, at least indirectly, of the people. However, in practice the courts sometimes thwart the will of Parliament while professing to uphold it. The trend of judicial activism in immigration law cases during the late 1980s and early 1990s exemplifies a open-minded view by the courts of the rights of refugees and other visa applicants which was clearly in conflict with the bipartisan view of Federal Parliament that a more restrictive approach was required. Every time the courts handed down a pro-rights decision, Parliament effectively nullified it by amending the Migration Act (Administrative law theories, 2000). Green Light Theorists versus Red Light Theorists The green light theory and red light theory were analysed in Harlow and Rawlings (1984) Law and Administration, Weidenfeld and Nicholson, London. The Red Light approach advocates a strong role for the courts to review administrative decisions. It considers that the function of law is to control the excesses of state. As Harlow and Rawlings put it: "Behind the formalist tradition, we can often discern a preference for a minimalist state. It is not surprising, therefore, to find many authors believing that the primary function of administrative law should be to control any excess of state power and subject it to legal and more especially judicial, control. It is this conception of administrative law that we have called 'red light theory' (Administrative law theories, 2000)." The Green Light approach considers that the function of administrative law is to make possible the operations of the state. It is based on the underlying principle that bureaucrats will function most efficiently in the absence of intervention. Administration should aim to help in simplifying the procedures and enhance efficiency. Harlow and Rawlings said: "Because they see their own function as the resolution of disputes and because they see the administrative function from the outside, lawyers traditionally emphasise external control through adjudication. To the lawyer, law is the policeman; it operates as an external control, often retrospectively (Administrative law theories, 2000). But a main concern of green light writers is to minimise the influence of the courts. Courts, with their legalistic values, were seen as obstacles to progress, and the control which they exercise as unrepresentative and undemocratic. To emphasise this crucial point in green light theory, decision-making by an elite judiciary imbued with a legalistic, rights-based ideology and eccentric vision of the 'public interest' ... was never a plausible counter to authoritarianism (Administrative law theories, 2000)." Public participation in local agencies decision making Decisions made without public input are usually considered as antidemocratic, which can hinder the acceptance of a technology. Democracy is based on public participation, at least indirect participation through elected representatives-in decisions that affect them. Few decisions today affect people more than those about the kinds of technologies that are developed and how they are used. Citizen input can be influential during the design or research and development (R&D) phase of technology (Increasing citizen participation, 2001). People can also affect how a technology is used once it passes into the public arena. Public participation in discussions about the development and uses of technology is also important for another reason-it can lead to greater technological literacy. The simple act of asking and trying to answer questions about technology can lead to a better understanding not only of technical, but also of the social, economic, and political aspects of the issue at hand. Public involvement also gives policy makers a sense of their constituents' fears and hopes, and thus an indication of the public response to a particular path of technology development, as well as to new or lesser known alternatives (Increasing citizen participation, 2001). The purpose of citizen's participation decision-making is: to develop a richer information base. Local citizens know the local needs and issues best; to educate both citizens and policy makers about the many dimensions of an issue or decision; to allow discussion of many points of view on the issue and give each citizen a voice; to make it easier to implement decision or policy easier; to help build accountability for public officials and citizen (Public participation in local decision making, 2004). However, public participation in critical regulations especially relating to health and risk regulation should be restricted since most of this decision is based on highly technical know-how. The demands for public participation in risk regulation, therefore, stems from a distrust of experts, a corresponding distrust of regulatory decision makers, and a conviction that most important risk regulations issues are not resolvable solely by reference to expertise. However, as the "interest representation" model has continued to evolve in the context of risk regulation, it has become more and more clear that the "public" is not a colossal body because man lives in a pluralistic society where one person's gain is another's loss. It has also become clear that there are several models available for structuring public partaking into the regulatory decision making process (McGarity, n.d.). Allowing individuals and groups to confront an agency's decision making forces the agency to expend resources defending itself that might otherwise be spent pursuing its legislative mission. Similarly, it requires regulatees in the private sector to expend additional resources beyond those required to deal with the agency itself. Public participation is time consuming (McGarity, n.d.). To the extent that effective public participation requires a two-way exchange of information, it can be contradictory with a regulatee's legitimate attention in defending valuable trade secrets and financial information. This conflict of interests becomes particularly acute in the context of health and environmental regulation, where the identity of a chemical and the content of any health and safety data concerning that chemical are serious to effective participation by environmental groups, but can also give way to unwarranted commercial advantages to competitors. For example, the identity of the segment of DNA inserted into that of a plant genetically engineered to secrete an insecticide is of obvious interest to both competitors and to persons concerned with the environmental effects of widespread use of the plant. This clash of interests suggests that not all participants should be treated equally in all aspects of regulatory decision making (McGarity, n.d.). As another example, organisations promoting wolf recovery or wolf protection come and go. At any given time there have been as many as 51 such organizations (International Wolf Center, 1982). Most were founded by laypeople, although a few employ biologists as staff or consultants. Furthermore most of them actively advocate for the wolf through lobbying or urging members to lobby legislators and government administrators, disseminating information (some of which may not be supported by available research), and writing letters to newspapers. Thus the quality and accuracy of the information disseminated by these organisation varies widely. Others admit intentionally disseminating false information (Anonymous,1992), whereas others do so out of innocence, negligence, or failure to check information taken from other groups. The misinformation promulgated by wolf advocacy groups varies from minor technical errors to major deception and fraud (Blanco, 1998). These misrepresentations have even made it into conference proceedings (Mech, n.d.). Reference List Administrative Law. (2006). Wikimedia. Available from: [10 Dec. 2006]. Administrative law theories. (2000). Northern Territory University, Darwin, Australia ('NTU'). Available from: [10 Dec. 2006]. Anonymous. (1992). Vaguely worded ads force Alaska to delay wolf kill. Star Tribune, 20A. Blanco, J. C. (1998). The extinction of the wolf in Spain. Account of a scientific fraud. Biologica 26, 56-59. Harlow and Rawlings (1984) Law and Administration, Weidenfeld and Nicholson, London. Increasing public participation. (2001). The National Academy of Sciences. Available from: [10 Dec. 2006]. International Wolf Center. (1982). Directory of wolf organizations. Ely, MN: International Wolf Center. McGarity, Thomas O. (n.d.). Public Participation in Risk Regulation. Available from: [10 Dec. 2006]. Mech, David L. (n.d.). Wolf Restoration to the Adirondacks:The Advantages and Disadvantages of Public Participation in the Decision. Available from: [10 Dec. 2006]. Public participation in local decision-making. (2004). University of New Hampshire Cooperative Extension. Available from: [10 Dec. 2006]. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Administrative law theories Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1533012-administrative-law-phd-essay
(Administrative Law Theories Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
https://studentshare.org/law/1533012-administrative-law-phd-essay.
“Administrative Law Theories Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1533012-administrative-law-phd-essay.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Administrative law theories

The Local Government Transport Act 2000

The cited instance of the issue connected with the granting of more number of taxi licenses against the number of licenses announced as will be issued is a case falling under the purview o the administrative law which implies the exercise of the power of the government delegated to the local administrative bodies by the legislature through various statutes.... “The administrative law emanates from the general rule of law that all government officials and public authorities are subject to the regular law of the land as administered by the courts”1....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

The Classical Organizational Theories

This paper "The Classical Organizational theories" discusses management today as practiced very differently than how it used to be at the time when the classical organizational theories, discussed in this paper, were introduced.... (Daft, 2004) Where Scientific Management talked about increasing the productivity and efficiency of individual workers, the administrative management involved the organization as a whole....
8 Pages (2000 words) Case Study

Public Administration

This normally places public administration officials in a dilemma since they do not know whether to serve the interests of… There are several theories that have been used to describe public administration practices (Farmer 49). The Hamiltonian tradition of Public Administration is made up of four pillars, namely: politics, The Hamiltonian School of thought holds that power rests with the executive....
4 Pages (1000 words) Research Paper

Schools of Management: A Review of its Evolution and An Outlook of Personal Integration

Though these thinkers' background gave them the authority to speak and explain management according to their fields, they did not acknowledge the inherent limits of their fields and their consequent theories.... The pattern is not hard to notice – the law adept pushed his bureaucratic management; engineers and mathematicians preferred the scientific and quantitative schools while psychologists gave preference to the behavioral school....
8 Pages (2000 words) Research Paper

Classical Theorists

Wilson did not believe in the principle of equality, implying that claims to superior wisdom cannot validate law or rule and that legalize government is based on the people's consent.... For Goodnow, administration mainly concerned the implementation of the law to ensure that the will of the nation is attained (Goodnow, 1905).... Wilson's approach to politics and administration was not ideal because it failed to provide a clear separation of powers of administrative agencies and the branches of government, which implies that one of them could affect the performance of the other....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

CONSTITUTION & ADMINISTRATIVE LAW

The above differences in argument, therefore, call for reexamination into other theories in order to understand the significance of the royal prerogative2.... Moreover, Wade an administrative theorist agrees with the arguments of Dicey and Blackstone albeit at... Dicey writing in 1885 explains it as every act that the executive can lawfully commit without an Act of Parliament....
4 Pages (1000 words) Coursework

Administrative Law Doctrine

This work "administrative law Doctrine" focuses on the issue of public standing.... The author outlines and gives a clear understanding of the administrative law doctrine about the standing of the public interest groups in relation to the review of judicially.... hellip; Standing law is in other words; a set of rules aiming to determine if the person who starts a case for a legal proceeding is, in fact, the one supposed to do so.... Hickman, 'In Defence of the Legal Constitution' (2005) 55 University of Toronto law Journal 981 pg 16)....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

Criminal Prevention and Punishment Program

The paper "Criminal Prevention and Punishment Program" describes that since alcohol is one of the major causes of crime, complicating the means of accessing it for example, by raising its price or banning their consumption in a particular manner, it would limit the chances of crime occurrence....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us