StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Critical Thinking - Inductives & deductive reasoning - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
According to Teitelbaum & Wilensky (2013), inductive reasoning is the reasoning whereby the premises request to deliver strong evidence for the truth of the conclusion. The argument for inductive reasoning is supposed to be probable, grounded upon the evidence given. In this…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.5% of users find it useful
Critical Thinking - Inductives & deductive reasoning
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Critical Thinking - Inductives & deductive reasoning"

CRITICAL THINKING CRITICAL THINKING Inductive Reasoning According to Teitelbaum & Wilensky , inductive reasoning is the reasoning whereby the premises request to deliver strong evidence for the truth of the conclusion. The argument for inductive reasoning is supposed to be probable, grounded upon the evidence given. In this case, a logical process contains several premises that are believed to be true. These premises are combined to attain a specific conclusion.For example Since Sue and Mary are friends where Mary enjoys running, fishing and rock climbing while Sue likes rock climbing and fishing, therefore, Sue ought to also like running.

In this argument, a close relationship has been established on Mary and Sue. In the first place the two women are friend and hence most likely they have common interests, hobbies, beliefs and so forth. The argument builds on likelihood of commonness between acquaintances in order to include an additional train that could be common for the two. The premise of this argument is the statement that gives details the close relationship involving the two ladies. The premises try to establish the commonness of the two girls.

In this case, the girls are friends and moreover, both of them like fishing and climbing rocks.The conclusion of this argument is that Sue also loves running. In inductive arguments, the truthfulness of the conclusion is derived from the explanations given in the premises. This argument is inductive because the premises present some evidence to support the truthfulness of the conclusion. Furthermore, nobody can determine its validity or invalidity. Only a comparison can be used to challenge the argument.

The conclusion needs not to be certain.Deductive reasoning According to Teitelbaum & Wilensky (2013), this is a process of reasoning based on one or more statements in order to arrive to a logically certain conclusion. These types of reasoning need to connect premises with conclusion. Deductive reasoning relies on clear and true rules of logic to reach a necessarily true conclusion.For exampleThere must be something incorrect with the engine of my truck, because it will not start.In this case, we are arguing that the engine of the truck is not function properly.

In the argument, the evidence of a bad engine is provided as that it will not start.In the argument, ‘’ there must be something incorrect with the engine of my truck’’ is the premise that needs to be ratified as true. In deductive logic, this premise will require to be supported with a conclusion that can either be validated or invalidated.In the argument, the conclusion is the fact that the truck’s engine failed to start. In this case, there are two outcomes of the logic: if the car fails to start, it implies that the premise is true, on the other hand, if the engine starts, therefore the premise is untrue.

The reasoning illustrated above is a deductive reasoning. This is because the certainty of the conclusion can be established in order to validate or invalidate the premises. In this, someone just requires starting the car’s engine and thus the truth is established.ReferenceTeitelbaum, J., & Wilensky, S. (2013). Logic and Philosophy: A Modern Introduction (2nd ed.). Sudbury, Mass.: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Critical Thinking - Inductives & deductive reasoning Essay”, n.d.)
Critical Thinking - Inductives & deductive reasoning Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1671473-critical-thinking-inductives-deductive-reasoning
(Critical Thinking - Inductives & Deductive Reasoning Essay)
Critical Thinking - Inductives & Deductive Reasoning Essay. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1671473-critical-thinking-inductives-deductive-reasoning.
“Critical Thinking - Inductives & Deductive Reasoning Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1671473-critical-thinking-inductives-deductive-reasoning.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Critical Thinking - Inductives & deductive reasoning

The Difference Between Inductive And Deductive Reasoning. How Are Issues Of Validity And Truth Distinguished

hellip; What is the difference between inductive and deductive reasoning?... deductive reasoning links the premises to the derived conclusions.... The conclusions drawn from the general principles through deductive reasoning could be validated by specific examples.... There are two other laws, namely the law of detachment and the law of contra-positive that are used in the process of deductive reasoning.... deductive reasoning could be explained with the help of the following example....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

The Concept of Critical Thinking

critical thinking critical thinking Argument 1 The premise of this argument is that all dogs are cats and all acts are mice.... Indeed, the conclusion is not logical and the reasoning leads to a false conclusion since no dogs are mice.... This is a deductive, cogent argument.... We can derive that the argument is deductive because the premises succeed in supporting and guaranteeing the truth of the conclusion (Bassham et al, 2011)....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Critical Thinking and Deecision Making

As explained in the Reality Assumptions for Becoming a Critical Thinker, one must be careful in stereotyping people because “we are classifying them in ways that do not meet the truth factor in deductive reasoning” (Reality Assumptions.... Stereotyping therefore does not adhere to the rules of critical thinking. In an article written by Annie Murphy Paul entitled “Where Bias Begins: The Truth about Stereotypes” Journal Two One of the most common and still practiced forms ifying people is stereotyping....
1 Pages (250 words) Essay

Critical Thinking Is Important to Mankind

The paper "critical thinking" states that the importance of deduction, induction and unstated premises to critical thinking is self-evident.... It stems from the fact that critical thinking involves reasoning and drawing conclusions, which are processes that incorporate these vital elements.... Truth and Knowledge critical thinking has always been important to mankind.... critical thinking is “the process of evaluation or categorization in terms of some previously accepted standards" (Halpern, 2003, p....
1 Pages (250 words) Essay

Inductive and Deductive Arguments

However, on the other hand, deductive reasoning is a form of reasoning that aims at reaching a specific conclusion by focusing on generalizations at initial stages.... In relation to this, it is of crucial significance to note that the case of Edward depicts a form of deductive reasoning.... This is a form of deductive reasoning.... The Consistent Preferences Approach to deductive reasoning in Games.... Seaside, CA: critical thinking Co, 2005....
1 Pages (250 words) Essay

Deductive and Inductive Arguments

Many have associated the difference to inferential reasoning, power, guarantee, and probability while others focus on the conclusive premises as a basis for an argument.... The paper "deductive and Inductive Arguments" discusses that the difference between inductive and deductive arguments lies in the ability of the premise to succinctly explain its conclusion.... The difference between inductive and deductive arguments has attracted discussion from different scholars....
1 Pages (250 words) Coursework

Critical Thinking Course in Academics

In the essay “critical thinking Course in Academics,” the author focuses on critical thinking, which facilitates rational, clear, and creative thinking among persons.... hellip; The author states that critical thinking demonstrates in individuals who have the capacity to comprehend logical relationships between arguments, identify the mode of arguments, appropriately construct responses, and evaluate the possible arguments.... In addition, critical thinking entails the ability to identify common mistakes....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Critical Analysis of an Article

At the same time, the article also exhibits deductive reasoning, as the author has attempted to apply general rules to the specific situation of global warming....   Examples of different kinds of reasoning in the text There are several different types of reasoning used in the scholarly writings: inductive, deductive, causal, and analogical.... The author strives to explain the causes behind the idea of the Earth Hour and its effects on environmental conditions through causal reasoning....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us