StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Under what conditions is abortion morally acceptable - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The debate surrounding abortion has been a part of public policy discourse for more than half a century now. Despite widespread exposure to the issue and passionate presentation of views there is no generally accepted consensus…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.5% of users find it useful
Under what conditions is abortion morally acceptable
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Under what conditions is abortion morally acceptable"

?Under what conditions, if ever, is abortion morally acceptable? Defend your answer by engaging with the possible views presented in the readings. The debate surrounding abortion has been a part of public policy discourse for more than half a century now. Despite widespread exposure to the issue and passionate presentation of views there is no generally accepted consensus. Apart from universally recognized pros and cons for legally permitting abortion, there are also localized cultural sensibilities to contend with. For example, regions of the country with a large religious demographic tend to oppose abortion even when it is practically unreasonable. On the other extreme, in the more liberal states region, there is the danger of abuse of the right to abortion by reckless, indulgent teenagers. This essay will argue that abortion must be exercised only under exceptional circumstances. Four key readings related to the topic are perused for constructing arguments. Dan Marquis’ essay “Why Abortion is Immoral” clearly suggests that the author looks cannot see any genuine moral grounds for permitting abortion. A central part of his essay is the idea of ‘potentiality’ of a developing fetus. Drawing analogy from the criminal justice system, he explains how the same moral justifications for condemning killing an adult should also apply for the fetus (irrespective of the period of gestation). This is so, Marquis argues, as terminating a fetus deprives it of all potential experience of life and happiness – the same rationale applied for sentencing those committing homicide. As Marquis poignantly asks “A necessary condition of resolving the abortion controversy is a ...theoretical account of the wrongness of killing. After all, if we merely believe, but do not understand, why killing adult human beings as ourselves is wrong, how could we conceivably show that abortion is either immoral or permissible” (Marquis, p.400) Marquis’ point is well taken, especially since he does not dogmatically cling to all the demands of the conservative camp. Marquis has no qualms about use of contraceptives, as it stands outside the concern with ‘killing’. Use of contraceptives is a preemptive act and does not interfere with the future (with all its potentialities) of a developing fetus. In contrast, what makes ‘killing’ wrong “is its effect on the victim. The loss of one’s life is one of the greatest losses one can suffer. The loss of one’s life deprives one of all the experiences, activities, projects, and enjoyments that would otherwise have constituted one’s future…” (Marquis, p.401) This is a meritorious argument and unless convincingly proved false, it should serve as a primary clause for forbidding abortions. Hence, Marquis makes a persuasive case for abstaining from abortion. Mary Anne Warren’s article “On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion” attempts to counter some of the claims made by Dan Marquis. She criticizes the ‘genetic code argument’, which states that since the genetic code or (DNA) of a fetus is the same as a fully formed human, the moral considerations in dealing with its termination will have be the same as those applied to adults. Though this argument is accurate from a biological viewpoint, it is too esoteric and removed from immediate factors governing an abortion decision. Warren then gives a brief treatise on the nature of personhood, an understanding of which is central to the topic of abortion. She argues that a fetus never acquires mature characteristics that would lead it to be thought of as a person in the legal and moral sense. To this point I would add that a fetus does not have the training, experience and mental development to conceive of its own future, thereby weakening claims of potential loss. According to Warren, the traits that are central to the concept of personhood (and by extension the applicability of moral considerations) are the following: “consciousness, reasoning, self-motivated activity, the capacity to communicate, the presence of self-concepts and self-awareness”. (Warren, p.385) Since a fetus of any stage of gestation only either minimally or not at all possess these traits, the assignation of personhood to it is incorrect. While there is truth to this argument, it still doesn’t validate the concept of abortion. A fetus may not qualify as a person, but it still has the capacity to feel pain, especially further down the gestation period. The lack of personhood status doesn’t translate to a license to inflict pain – a grave and fatal one at that. Hence, Warren’s argument should not be construed as an advocacy for abortion, as it is an exposition of the moral evaluation of this action. I would add that since there is a constitutional vacuum with respect to seeking legal answers to the issue, placing emphasis on the moral domain is a prudent approach. And under the moral domain, the odds are heavily stacked against the pro-choice stance. Amid passionate viewpoints from both sides of the abortion debate, L.W. Sumner offers a refreshingly moderate view. His article titled A Moderate View points out the logical flaws in the arguments of conservatives and liberals alike. A particular criticism is with respect to the unchanging moral status of a fetus throughout pregnancy. He explains, “the common source of these defects lies in their uniform accounts of the moral status of the fetus. First, they require that all abortions be accorded the same moral status regardless of the stage of pregnancy at which they are performed. Thus, liberals must hold that late abortions are as morally innocuous as early ones, and conservatives must hold that early abortions are as morally serious as late ones. Neither view is able to support the common conviction that late abortions are more serious than early ones.” (Sumner, p.406) Sumner then proposes a middle path approach to the debate, under which, early term abortions are generally morally sound. And later term abortions are only permitted after thorough deliberation of various factors. A general rule of thumb that Sumner seems to recommend is one of deterrence to abortion commensurate with the maturity of the fetus. Of all the various views studied in the readings, Sumner’s seems the most workable and fair solution to the debate surrounding abortion. While not siding with either sides of the debate completely, Sumner offers a moderated protocol for arriving at abortion decisions, where a nuanced understanding of the moral status is brought to bear on the decision. This moderate approach has much going for it, for there are clear flaws in both pro-choice and pro-life framework of analysis. In criticism of Sumner, one should note that the moral rightness or wrongness of any particular instance of abortion is not a black and white situation. Instead, each individual case can be evaluated and placed in a gradient of moral correctness. Hence to cite the lack of personhood and a fully developed consciousness on the part of a nascent fetus is not a sound rationale for committing abortion (even at an early stage). To the various authors’ perspectives discussed above, the following comments can be added. Late term abortions can be permitted in exceptional circumstances such as risk to mother, incest pregnancies, age and maturity of the carrying mother, drug addictions, etc. In particular, pregnancy through rape or incest challenges pro-lifers’ stance. Similarly, when continued pregnancy poses a threat to the life and wellbeing of the mother, abortion has to be considered. On the other hand, while a mother’s rights on her body are recognized, it is not a license to reckless sexual behavior that leads to pregnancy. Those women, who voluntarily indulge in sexual intercourse, knowing that this could lead to pregnancy, bear certain responsibilities for consequences thereafter. In this scenario, aborting is akin to depriving the fetus of its innate rights and thus constituting an injustice. With due respect to the rights of women over their bodies, a developing fetus is much more than an appendage to the woman carrying it. Having critically looked at the various viewpoints of authors, we can arrive at a broad conclusion. While there is no universal consensus as to permit abortion or not, general moral guidelines can be perused for arriving at decisions. Under these guidelines, preserving the life and prospects of a developing fetus is the default position from which the decision to abort is a matter of exception rather than the rule. Authors arguing from moderate and conservative stances have laid a series of moral and legal criteria for a case of abortion to satisfy. It is obvious that most cases would not qualify under these sound criteria. Further weakening the liberal stance is the ‘burden of proof’ criteria. A fetus’ development to full maturity and birth is a natural course of action. So it is upon pro-choice advocates to present convincing arguments for stalling this natural phenomenon. In other words, continuation of pregnancy happens by default, unless persuasive reasons to the contrary are offered. Such rationale have not yet been presented by those supporting abortion. Hence, on balance, abortion is morally acceptable only under rare and peculiar circumstances that are an exception rather than the rule. References: Dan Marquis, Why Abortion is Immoral (400) Thomson, A Defense of Abortion (391) Mary Anne Warren, On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion (384) L.W. Sumner, A Moderate View (405) Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Under what conditions is abortion morally acceptable Essay”, n.d.)
Under what conditions is abortion morally acceptable Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1461118-under-what-conditions-is-abortion-morally-acceptable
(Under What Conditions Is Abortion Morally Acceptable Essay)
Under What Conditions Is Abortion Morally Acceptable Essay. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1461118-under-what-conditions-is-abortion-morally-acceptable.
“Under What Conditions Is Abortion Morally Acceptable Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1461118-under-what-conditions-is-abortion-morally-acceptable.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Under what conditions is abortion morally acceptable

Is abortion not morally justifiable

This essay entitled "is abortion not morally justifiable?... In other words, this contention is acceptable, only if the developmental history of adult humans includes embryos that are arithmetically the same as the adult humans (Montague 307).... In addition, a 2010 Gallup poll disclosed that most of the respondents considered abortion to be morally unjustifiable.... These respondents were required to indicate whether the list of issues provided to them was, in their opinion, morally right or wrong....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Should Abortion be Allowed

In the paper “Should abortion be Allowed?... rdquo; the author tries to answer the question: to what extent should abortion be allowed?... hellip; The author states that the Jane Organization has roused a whole new thought about abortion and how its patients should be viewed and treated.... The organization main objective was to ensure that women get quality services in relation to abortion.... The organization main objective was to ensure that women get quality services in relation to abortion....
11 Pages (2750 words) Research Paper

Can Abortion be a Morally Acceptable Choice

rg), while the pro-choice (or pro-abortion according to their enemies) see, at their most extreme any abortion (even the of the so-called 'partial birth type) as morally acceptable.... The two positions have been set out and logic, practically and ethics falls on the side that some abortions are indeed morally acceptable.... Thus abortions up until about six months are morally legitimate as until this time the baby cannot survive outside the mother's body....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Some Abortions are Immoral and Some are Moral

abortion of a child implicates many emotional, moral, ethical and legal issues.... hellip; Different philosophers have given their theories judging abortion either moral or a sinful immoral step. Motherhood is a blessing and aborting a child is always a very hard step for the mother.... An abortion is the deliberate termination of pregnancy, which can be done due to many reasons.... abortion not only effects mother and her baby but also the rest of the family members: father, siblings of baby, grandparents, friends and everyone else involved in the process....
11 Pages (2750 words) Essay

Abortion and Infanticide

Such arguments… The determination of the morality behind abortion is done basing on religion, acceptable ethics and general emotions.... The determination of the morality behind abortion is done basing on religion, acceptable ethics and general emotions.... However, this does not mean that his sentiments about abortion and infanticide are acceptable.... The argument of whether abortion is morally right or wrong has been a major debatable topic....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Abortion: Rights vs Socially Constructed Morality

This paper "abortion: Rights vs Socially Constructed Morality" presents the decision as to whether to keep a child or have an abortion under our rights as individuals are constitutionally, and otherwise in the hands of the woman.... hellip; Furthermore, it is the contention of Lawrence Tribe, Professor of Law, Harvard University and mine as well that current attitudes and debates surrounding abortion these days have been “socially constructed”, not to mention irrevocably politicized to suit the moralistic resurgent needs of a puritanical ethic antithetical to the rights of women....
8 Pages (2000 words) Literature review

Under What Conditions, If Ever, Is Abortion Morally Acceptable

The paper "Under What Conditions, If Ever, is abortion morally acceptable?... nbsp; … The debate surrounding abortion has been a part of public policy discourse for more than half a century now.... Apart from universally recognized pros and cons for legally permitting abortion, there are also localized cultural sensibilities to contend with.... nbsp; Dan Marquis' essay “Why abortion is Immoral” clearly suggests that the author looks cannot see any genuine moral grounds for permitting abortion....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Why Abortion is Immoral by Dom Marquis

"Why abortion is Immoral by Dom Marquis" paper examines the plight of the individual who has to undergo that unfortunate process of abortion which is her private suffering from a physical and psychological angle and examines how the society treats women and the disposition of menfolk towards them.... But the ground reality is unsatisfactory on many counts, the result being women are driven to desperation to go for abortion.... What makes the girl child insecure and why the female fetus is awarded the punishment of abortion?...
10 Pages (2500 words) Coursework
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us