StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Do Animals Have Personality - Coursework Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "Do Animals Have Personality?" focuses on the critical analysis of a thorough argument on the question of whether animals have a personality. It discusses the different theories of various theorists over time, concerning the possibilities of the existence of personalities in non-human species…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96% of users find it useful

Extract of sample "Do Animals Have Personality"

Do animals have a personality? Student Name Student Number: Course: Tutor: Tutorial: Due Date: Date Submitted: Word Count: Abstract Personality is a term used to describe the differences seen among people in terms of behavior patterns, emotions and cognition. Different theorists on personality present different definitions based on their particular theoretical positions. While the study on personality has mainly been based on humans, a lot of study has been done concerning animal personality and many theories have been formulated on the same. This study of personality focuses on two areas: One is the study and understanding of individual differences in characteristics such as irritability or sociability. The other involves understanding of how various parts of an individual’s personality come together to form a whole personality. Introduction This paper will provide a thorough argument on the question whether animals have a personality. It will discuss the different theories formulated by various theorists over time, concerning the possibilities of the existence of personalities in non-human species. Furthermore, the paper will explore the similarities and differences of the various theories, while critically analyzing and explaining the mentioned theories in the context of research done so far. In addressing the question, the paper will highlight some of the theories on human personality psychology and the various theorists who took centre-stage in this field. In arguing about animal psychology, parallels will be drawn to human personality studies. Various research works will be highlighted and the findings critically analyzed. Additionally, relevant examples will be drawn from the research work and from general information on the same. Finally, a conclusion will be drawn based on the arguments and discussion. Ideally, this paper will come out in support of the argument question, citing the overwhelming evidence from research and day-to-day life that proves that animals indeed have personalities, equitable to the human idea of personality differences. Definitions of Personality Personality has been generally defined as an organized, dynamic set of characteristics that are possessed by an individual and that have unique influence on his or her emotions, cognitions, motivations and behaviors in varying situations (Thomas et al., 2006, p.12). Most of the ideas that have been developed by both historical and modern theorists stem from simple philosophical assumptions held. However, the field of personality is not purely empirical given that it combines the elements of science, art and philosophy to draw varying conclusions. Theorists disagree on some fundamental philosophical assumptions, which include: Heredity versus environment, freedom versus determinism, uniqueness versus universality, optimistic versus pessimistic and active versus reactive (Thomas et al., 2006, p.23). The study and research on personality is based on the essential assumption that all individuals are similar in some ways, yet very different in others. A number of theories on personality have been proposed by various famous thinkers such as Erik Erikson and Sigmund Freud among others. Biological theories suggest that individual genetics are directly responsible for personality. Hans Eysenck was one of the well known biological theorists. He linked aspects of individual personality to certain biological processes. For instance, Eysenck argued that extroverts have low cortical stimulatory arousal, hence causing them to seek stimulating experiences. On the other hand, introverts have higher cortical arousal; hence they avoid stimulation (Schultz et al., 2012). On the other hand, Behavioral theories bring forth the idea that personality results from individual interaction with the environment. Theorists John Watson and B.F. Skinner studied the measurable and observable behaviors in relation to environmental influences, consequently rejecting any theory that takes feelings and internal thoughts into account (Hiriyapa, 2012, p.23). In contrast, Psychodynamic theories on personality explore the influence of childhood experiences and the unconscious mind on personality (Schultz et al., 2012). These theories are largely influenced by the works of Sigmund Freud, who believed in three personality components namely: id, ego and the superego. He theorized that the id caters for needs and urges while the superego takes care of morals and ideals. The ego acts as a moderator between the two while checking on reality (Thomas et al., 2006, p.76). The trait theories suggest that a personality is composed of a number of constituent traits while humanist theories explore the importance and role of free will and individual experiences in the development of personality. Comparative study has been done on animals and many similarities and differences have been drawn on the corresponding theories and explanations of animal personalities. Notwithstanding all the above, the Evolution theory introduces an evolutionary twist based on the concept of natural selection as explained in Darwin’s theory of the evolution of species (Schultz et al., 2012). Personality in animals To people who own pets and those that work closely with various animals, it is rather obvious that animals have varying individual differences in behavior. This means that they exhibit consistent patterns of behavior which would be classified as ‘personality traits’ when referring to humans (Goosling, 2001, p.44). However, most people have shown reluctance to agree that indeed non-human animal species exhibit personalities. Empirical research done on animal personality is mainly composed of studies on traits, which can be seen as behavioral regularities that are considerably consistent across varying time and contexts. Research on differences in individual animals has early beginnings, such as the work done by Ivan Pavlov. Ivan did a number of studies on dogs (Pavlov, 1906), where he identified four basic personality types, grounded on three properties in the nervous system, i.e. Force, Mobility and Equilibrium. From this, Pavlov recognized how these variations affected the qualities of the involved individual animals (Pavlov, 1928). Much later, researchers Goosling, Marino and Lilienfeld (2003) evaluated varying evidence as pertains to the existence of animal personalities. Additionally, a lot of studies have shown the temporal stability in animal personality traits e.g. Stevenson-Hinde et al., (1980); Capitano, (1999); Uher et al., (2008). Put together, this research provides compelling evidence that animals do indeed have personalities. Furthermore, personality traits have been tested in varying species, such as hyenas (Gosling, 1998), rhesus monkeys (Stevenson-Hinde & Zunz, 1978) and octopuses (Mather & Anderson, 1993, p.67). Conversely, no research has objectively compared animal and human assessments in one design. As a result, Kwan, Goosling and John (2003) investigated, concurrently, the accuracy, similarities and differences of 78 dogs and their respective owners. Parallel procedures and instrumentation were used in comparing the ratings based on three criteria of accuracy. On all criteria, the judgments of the dogs were quite similar to those of humans, hence once more suggesting that personality differences exist in animals and can be measured. In contrast, some researchers beg to differ on the existence of personalities in animals as we know them in humans. In making comparisons across species, questions do arise on the equivalence of observable traits in varying species. (Beer, Shimamura & Knight, 2004) ask how it can be determined precisely that what seems like boldness in trout or squid is by any means similar to boldness as known in humans? However, a comparative researcher asking if the sociable behavior of a colobus monkey reflects the same sociability as we know in humans is quite analogous to a cross-culture researcher asking if the angry expressions of an isolated human group reflects the same anger known in our cultures. Yet, in the midst of doubting voices, I once saw a goat so striking in character that it seemed strikingly human. The goat wondered the streets of Nairobi, Kenya, approaching people boldly and defiantly, even arrogantly refusing to move out of the way of oncoming traffic. On the other hand, I have seen timid goats that lack in ‘confidence’ and shy away from humans and are generally reserved in nature. Are these not examples of ‘goat personality’ as we would describe in a human case? Ogden (2014) talks of how elephant groups are led by an elder female, who has great influence over the decision making of the particular herd. In the research at Amboseli National Park in Kenya, multiple elephant families engage in characteristic friendly associations such as ceremonial greeting and even touching between bond groups. As such, elephants exhibit peculiar personalities and various character traits associated with leadership have been noted in leading matriarchs in herds. A.T.A Ritchie, in his observations of rhinos noted that some were irritable, some even-tempered, some brave, volatile and some phlegmatic, much like you would expect with humans. Perhaps the question to ask is it that determines personality? It follows that, in human circles, personality emanates from past experiences, inherited tendencies and education over time. The same can be said of animals. Therefore, it is worth concluding that any person opposed to the idea of animal personality doesn’t have a problem with the idea per se, but the problem is in using the same word to refer to the set of traits that are particular to each human and non-human animal (Hiriyapa, 2012, p.62). Until the 1990’s, many psychologists argued that, in order for the term personality to make sense, it had to refer to humans. However, a graduate student named Berkeley changed this biased view by adopting the strategy of reduction to absurdity. Today, many researchers and people in general are coming to terms with the ‘absurdity’ of personalities in animals. Conclusion From the overwhelming evidence presented in the text, it is convincingly clear that animals have personalities. Perhaps the bone of contention arises from the definition of that word ‘personality’ and whether it should mean the same for animals as it does for humans. All things being equal, animals can be said to have individual personality as argued. References Beer, J. S., Shimamura, A.P., & Knight, R.T. (2004). Frontal lobe contributions to executive control of cognitive and social behavior. In M. S. Gazzaniga, (Ed.), The Cognitive Neurosciences III (pp. 1091–1104). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Capitanio, J.P., Mendoza, S.P., & Baroncelli, S. (1999). The relationship of personality dimensions in adult male rhesus macaques to progression of Simian Immunodeficiency Virus disease. In S. Cain, Brain Behaviour. (pp 138– 154). Gosling, S.D. (1998). Personality dimensions in spotted hyenas. In J. Comp, Crocuta Crocuta ( pp.107-118). Gosling, S. D. (2001). From mice to men: what can we learn about personality from animal research. Brooklyn, NY: Hang Loose Press. Gosling, S.D., Lilienfeld, S.O., & Marino, L. (2003). Personality. In D. Maestripieri, (Ed.), Primate Psychology: The Mind and Behavior of Human and Non-human Primates (pp. 254–288). Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Gosling, S. D. & John, O. P. (1999). Personality dimensions in non-human animals: A cross-species review. Journal of Psychological Science. 8, 69–75. Hiriyapa, B. (2012). Development of Personality and its Theories. Bloomington, IN: Booktango. Mather, J. A., & Anderson, R. C. (1993). Personalities of Octopuses. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 107, 336–340. Ogden, L. (2014). Pachyderm politics. New Scientist, 221(2950), 42–45. Pavlov, I. P. (1906). The scientific investigation of the psychical faculties or processes in the higher animals. Science, 24, 613–619. Pavlov, I. P. (1928). The inhibitory type of nervous systems in the dog. In I. P. Pavlov & W. H. Gantt (Eds.), Lectures on Conditioned Reflexes: Twenty-five Years of Objective Study of the Higher Nervous Activity Behaviour of Animals (pp. 363–369). New York: Liverwright Publishing Corporation. Stevenson-Hinde, J., & Zunz, M. (1978). Subjective assessment of individual rhesus monkeys. Primates, 19, 473–482. Schultz, D. & Schultz S. (Ed). (2012). Theories of Personality. London: Cengage Learning. Thomas, J.C. & Segal, D.L. (2006). Comprehensive Handbook of Personality and Psychopathology: Personality and Everyday Functioning. Hoboken, NJ: John wiley & Sons. Uher, J., Asendorpf, J. B., & Call, J. (2008). Personality in the behaviour of great apes: Temporal stability, cross-situational consistency and coherence in response. Animal Behaviour, 75, 99–112. Read More

The study and research on personality is based on the essential assumption that all individuals are similar in some ways, yet very different in others. A number of theories on personality have been proposed by various famous thinkers such as Erik Erikson and Sigmund Freud among others. Biological theories suggest that individual genetics are directly responsible for personality. Hans Eysenck was one of the well known biological theorists. He linked aspects of individual personality to certain biological processes.

For instance, Eysenck argued that extroverts have low cortical stimulatory arousal, hence causing them to seek stimulating experiences. On the other hand, introverts have higher cortical arousal; hence they avoid stimulation (Schultz et al., 2012). On the other hand, Behavioral theories bring forth the idea that personality results from individual interaction with the environment. Theorists John Watson and B.F. Skinner studied the measurable and observable behaviors in relation to environmental influences, consequently rejecting any theory that takes feelings and internal thoughts into account (Hiriyapa, 2012, p.23). In contrast, Psychodynamic theories on personality explore the influence of childhood experiences and the unconscious mind on personality (Schultz et al., 2012). These theories are largely influenced by the works of Sigmund Freud, who believed in three personality components namely: id, ego and the superego.

He theorized that the id caters for needs and urges while the superego takes care of morals and ideals. The ego acts as a moderator between the two while checking on reality (Thomas et al., 2006, p.76). The trait theories suggest that a personality is composed of a number of constituent traits while humanist theories explore the importance and role of free will and individual experiences in the development of personality. Comparative study has been done on animals and many similarities and differences have been drawn on the corresponding theories and explanations of animal personalities.

Notwithstanding all the above, the Evolution theory introduces an evolutionary twist based on the concept of natural selection as explained in Darwin’s theory of the evolution of species (Schultz et al., 2012). Personality in animals To people who own pets and those that work closely with various animals, it is rather obvious that animals have varying individual differences in behavior. This means that they exhibit consistent patterns of behavior which would be classified as ‘personality traits’ when referring to humans (Goosling, 2001, p.44). However, most people have shown reluctance to agree that indeed non-human animal species exhibit personalities.

Empirical research done on animal personality is mainly composed of studies on traits, which can be seen as behavioral regularities that are considerably consistent across varying time and contexts. Research on differences in individual animals has early beginnings, such as the work done by Ivan Pavlov. Ivan did a number of studies on dogs (Pavlov, 1906), where he identified four basic personality types, grounded on three properties in the nervous system, i.e. Force, Mobility and Equilibrium.

From this, Pavlov recognized how these variations affected the qualities of the involved individual animals (Pavlov, 1928). Much later, researchers Goosling, Marino and Lilienfeld (2003) evaluated varying evidence as pertains to the existence of animal personalities. Additionally, a lot of studies have shown the temporal stability in animal personality traits e.g. Stevenson-Hinde et al., (1980); Capitano, (1999); Uher et al., (2008). Put together, this research provides compelling evidence that animals do indeed have personalities.

Furthermore, personality traits have been tested in varying species, such as hyenas (Gosling, 1998), rhesus monkeys (Stevenson-Hinde & Zunz, 1978) and octopuses (Mather & Anderson, 1993, p.67). Conversely, no research has objectively compared animal and human assessments in one design.

Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(Do Animals Have Personality Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words, n.d.)
Do Animals Have Personality Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words. https://studentshare.org/psychology/2063627-do-animals-have-personality
(Do Animals Have Personality Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
Do Animals Have Personality Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words. https://studentshare.org/psychology/2063627-do-animals-have-personality.
“Do Animals Have Personality Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”. https://studentshare.org/psychology/2063627-do-animals-have-personality.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Do Animals Have Personality

Animal testing why and why not

animals have been a part of man's life since time immemorial.... Although animals have their own defensive characteristics, they are usually considered defenseless and depend on their owner for protection.... Dogs, cats, hamsters and other small creatures have found their way to people's homes as pets.... Some also serve as companions to human beings, especially those who have disabilities or a just lonely.... Unlike in the past when there was not a very loud clamor for to recognize animal rights, nowadays, animal lovers have spoken for their pets and animals in general and have put into motion several activities in order for society to recognize that animal's, too, have privileges....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

Day-to-day Survival with Plants and Animals

In other words, Polan believes that animals have certain rights as well, knowing that his point reveals the fundamental treatment that animals may potentially deserve even if they are the kind solely intended for human consumption.... On the contrary, Tom Regan is so strong with his sheer stand, that just like humans, animals have positive interests too.... Regan therefore is trying to emphasize the point that animals have the basic right to survive, which is technically the essence of their positive interests....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Use of animals in psychological experiments

Attachment theory was a deviation from Freud's theory that the child's bond with the mother is of upmost importance in the development of the adult personality, developed by John Bowlby.... Despite this as further evidence of the range of emotions and thought processes that animals are able to experience have emerged, scientists, including psychologists, have looked for different forms of studying behavior which does not include hurting animals physically or emotionally, as the use of psychological research on animals involves insistent mental, psychological and physical stress being put on the animals (Harding, 2009)....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Orwells Animal Farm

To directly criticize it wouldn't have been a smart move on his behalf as it would stir a rebellion against him in his readers before they warm up to his point of view in the first place.... He even had a hard time finding someone who would publish this book which did not have direct form of criticism, let alone write a political essay which might not have been published in the first place.... Fables or the parables through out history have given writers a freedom to criticize institutions or the individuals without in any way endangering themselves by being very straight forward or direct and offending not only the accused party but their own readers who have contrary beliefs too....
5 Pages (1250 words) Research Paper

Personality and Social Cognitive Theory of Bandura

animals have personalities, emotions and thoughts, just as humans do, UT Austin psychologist says.... A) It is a very interesting question because in my view the answer to it is yes as animals tend to behave and react to situations in a different manner according to their temperament and personality.... esearch over this issue such as, a psychologist from the University of Texas has proven in his research that cats, dogs, hyenas and other animals possess different personality traits (Utexas, 2012)....
1 Pages (250 words) Essay

Animal Rights

This paper ''Animal Rights'' tells that A propagation of contemplation insisting that all the animals have a right to live their own lives and they should be safe from human cruelty and brutality.... Farming and upbringing of animals is increase but there are various unnatural techniques applied to have rapid growth.... echnological advancements have been as too told to the usage of manpower over rowed Similarly, previously animals were also utilized as a labor force so that workload would be distributed....
7 Pages (1750 words) Research Paper

Animal Welfare and Advice

This paper discusses the ways to deal with neglected animals, particularly the responsibilities that one would have when dealing with neglected animals.... Animal health officers, the police and Local councils have the authority of enforcing this Act.... The author of this paper claims that the Animal Welfare Act of the United States, signed into law in 1966, prohibits neglect and cruelty towards animals.... He or she must ensure that the animal: has somewhere suitable to live; is kept away from or with other animals....
6 Pages (1500 words) Research Paper

No to Animal Testing

According to different articles on the internet, every rabbit has an idiosyncratic personality but they are all playful, trivial, independent, and fascinating as the popular puppies and kittens (Andrew 1).... The paper "No to Animal Testing" reminds there are cold and barren cages containing animals in laboratories waiting to face the undeserved execution.... These animals cannot do anything about their condition but suffer in pain, twinge with loneliness, and hope for a day they walk free again....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us