Yesterday I interviewed a neighbor who has a green lawn in front of her house. My first question was to inquire whether she knew about xeriscape. Surprisingly, she had heard about it but did not have any idea of what it pertained. From her opinion, xeriscape was a garden with cactus and rocks over it. This is the reason she preferred green lawn to xeriscape. The argument used here is deductive reasoning based on the general statement. Some people still think that xeriscape must resemble either death valley with bone-dry and filled with cacti or ugly looking plant. This is not the case, but can be as refreshing as an oasis. Besides that, some of the native plants have unique and attractive color, which can make the entire garden appear beautiful and lively.
In addition, the neighbor thought that the xeriscape would be complex to take care because of the plants planted around the yard as compared to green lawns, which do not have plants. Still, the argument in here is deductive reasoning based on faulty conclusion. In reality, green lawns are more complex to maintain and expensive than xeriscape. Even though the plants in xeriscape make it appear complex, it is ease it to maintain. This is because unlike green lawns, xeriscape does not require sprinkle system, grass cutting, and saves a lot of water. It is most applicable to those people with limited time to care for heir garden. More time is consumed in maintaining green lawns, as it requires grass cutting monthly to maintain its appearance. The sprinkle systems used in green lawns consume a lot of water.
From the lady’s perception, xeriscape would not match with the Los Angeles climate. Surprisingly, from her idea that xeriscape resembles cactus, she thought that people would laugh at her, and criticize her of living in a desert where cactus are grown. The argument used in coming up with this thought is stereotype. Exhibited in real life, numerous plants can be planted