Science of Sex Appeal Being Biologically Imperative - Research Paper Example

?Running head: HUMAN MATE CHOICE- SCIENCE OF SEX APPEAL BEING BIOLOGICALLY IMPERATIVE Human Mate Choice- Science of Sex Appeal Being Biologically Imperative Insert Name Insert Grade Course Insert Tutor’s Name 14 November 2013 Human Mate Choice- Science of Sex Appeal Being Biologically Imperative Biological imperatives are wants, drives, and needs required by human beings and other living organisms for them to continue living and to be in existence. Some of the biological imperatives are very essential in life including reproduction, quality life, and even survival tactics. In addition, sex is one of the biological imperatives that human beings need for survival and for proper perpetuation and reproduction. Therefore, it is important that proper sex appeal and science of human reproduction be clearly understood for people to understand deeply the human mate choice (Messer, 2010). Generally, human mate choice is a behavioral aspect of human beings. In relation to human behavioral ecology, it involves the evolution of human behaviour in regards the choices that people made before and the choices they make today. Indeed, due to the evolution of human behaviour over the years, it is practically impossible for people to make the same choices today as they used to make several years ago. This is basically as a result of generational changes whose influence in people’s behaviour dictate that human beings behave differently in different environments. In other words, the strategies that human beings adopt in a certain environment (for example 50 years ago) may not be the same strategies they adopt in contemporary social environment. This paper will discuss the behaviour of human beings in choosing their mates as well as the science sex appeal from an anthology point of view. According to human reproduction system and human anatomy studies, men and women are significantly different on the sex appeal choice they always make. Generally, men are always promiscuous while on the other hand women are at times selective on the choice of sex partner they choose. Again, before women make the best choice, they look for some qualities from men whereas men only go for physical looks of a woman. The major characteristic of human beings that make people different from other animals is the ability to speak and use their mind selectively. In addition, human beings’ physical appearance also makes them unique and more different on the way they do things. This differences and uniqueness of human beings make people value and even be different on matters dealing with sex from the rest of other creatures. To be more clear, it is true that biological imperatives control and direct human beings sexual behavior (Messer, 2010). According to studies, it has been found that sex appeal is scientifically and theoretically proven biologically imperative. This is because evolution in most cases is what is controlling human beings’ sexual desires. According to evolution, human beings are the only creatures that are able to walk upright after evolving from similar walking styles with other primates. Again, after evolution, human beings and in particular females changed their external body parts appearance including the location of the vagina, which later made it very difficult to be accessed by males (Kalbe et al, 2009). In most cases, it is always found that, due to sex differences, women tend to have likeness and preferences for partners who are higher or greater than they are in terms of status, education, and even wealth. In contrast to this, men always look for girls, who are virgin, healthy, and physically attractive (Elias, Menon, Wetzel, & Williams 2010). Evolutionary theory clearly indicates that human beings mate choices have evolved and mostly focus on the exploitation of resources, social well-being , physical appearance, and capital investment of the opposite sex partner. In most cases, similarities and differences in the choice and preferences of a partner mostly depend on the form of reproductive potential and investment of the opposite sex. Sexual selection is said to have come about as a result of natural selection for survival, and therefore, people have to use attractive elements in order to get the preferred partner of choice. This natural selection evolution theory says that, human beings always create good and relevant qualities and traits that do not last long, dealing with ecological utility or convergent evolution (Kalbe et al, 2009). According to anthropologists, among human ancestors, only human physical attraction and competition were important for winning mates of the opposite sex. Again, male physical competition and attractiveness was the only factor considered in the sexual selection of partners. During that period, people saw human beings especially men to be similar with other primates in the choice of mate they were making. Generally, men are always more muscular and more aggressive than women. Indeed, in the past, women valued men’s deep voice and viewed it as a more attractive characteristic. Furthermore, anthropologists argue that, a man does not have more unique characteristics from other animals. This leads to male competition for the woman of their dreams, leading to use of physical means in order to win (Sachs, 2009). According to Charles Darwin (1871), human mate choice is an evolutionary process, which on the side of men mostly depends on the qualities that are more attractive. There are various principles that direct the choice of a partner or mate, and some of them include sensory bias, fisherian runaway and genetic compatibility. Again, indicator traits and phenotypic importance also play a role on the choice of a mate. In addition, in the choice of a mate, females are always more choosy and selective in the kind and choice of a mate they make. Besides, it is clear that females are choosier because the choice of a mate they make will sometimes lead to pregnancy and consequently children; indeed, the quality of these children’s lifestyle will directly depend on the choice of the mate or on their mate’s lifestyle. On the other hand, according to anthropologists, males must compete and even fight for the choice of a mate they want to live with since it is not mandatory that they will be allowed and accepted by the females they want. Therefore, it is important that parents to allow their male children to go for the mate of their choice to pursue parental investment. According to parental investment theory, all parents should provide and look for ways of investing for their future children and any parent who fails to do this is making himself or herself liable for future competition of mates with the sex mate who has involved in parental investment. For women to be choosy, they must portray desirable qualities in order to gain from the opposite sex. Such gains may include protection, parental care and more financial support. On the other hand, other indirect benefits a selective woman may get from her mate of choice are children with desirable qualities and strength. The benefit where the selective female mate gets desirable children with quality genes is known as phenotypic benefit (Frost, 2008). In most cases, the choices of mates females make marjory depend on the overall good qualities the male mate have and the general genotypic compatibility between them. Again, females can also use sensory bias where a non-mating context is used to select a mate with good qualities. In addition, females also use sexy son hypothesis where they choose a mate on condition that the mate will result and produce good and desirable qualities. Lastly, females also use indicator traits to choose a mate, which always involve the preference of a mate who has good qualities in order to produce good children. Nevertheless, women always believe that mating with such males will result in good and better offspring (Conley, 2011). In conclusion, it is evident from the discussion above that, the human mate choice and the science of sex appeal is one of the biological imperatives that are necessary for survival and proper continuity of life. Again, it is evident that females are very selective on the kind of partner they choose and it all depends on the quality of life a male mate can offer and the desirable qualities that the male possess. On the other hand, the discussion has established that, males usually look for the degree of health, virginity, and physical appearance including beauty when selecting their mates. Again, according to anthropologists, males have to fight or must be ready to involve in physical competition in order to get the appropriate mate of their dreams. On the other hand, females are more selective and must look for males who are above them in terms of education level and social status in order to choose them as the kind of mates to stay with. Therefore, from the discussion above, it is clear that females do benefit a lot in the events of science of sex appeal and mate choice. On the other hand, males have to work hard, go an extra mile and must have desirable qualities in order to be chosen as the mates of choice by females. The evolution theories have shown that, sexual choices have evolved due to natural selection and the need for survival, thereby causing human beings especially females to select only mates with desirable qualities and those who can promise good life. Again, human beings in the past, especially males were to use physical competition even to the extent of involving in fights in order to win the mates of their dreams. This made males to be not unique, given that other animals also do the same in order to win their mates of choice or in order to involve in reproduction. From this point of view, the anthropologists argue that females are the only unique individuals when it comes to the choice of a mate. Preferences Conley, T. D. (2011). Perceived proposer personality characteristics and gender differences in acceptance of casual sex offers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, pp.115-124. Elias, P. M., Menon, C., Wetzel, B., & Williams, J. (2010). Barrier requirement as the Evolutionary: Epidermal pigmentation in humans. American Journal of Human Biology, 22 (4), 526-537. Frost, P. (2008). Sexual selection and human geographical variation, special issue. Journal of Social, Evolutionary and Cultural Psychology, Pp.169-191. Retrieved from http://shell.newpaltz.edu/jsec/articles/volume2/issue4/NEEPSfrost.pdf. Kalbe, M. et al. (2009). Lifetime reproductive success is maximized with optimal MHC diversity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, Biological Sciences, pp. 925-934.Retrieved from http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/276/1658/925.full.pdf+html. Messer, A. (2010). It was brawn over beauty in human mating competition, anthropologist says. Science daily. Retrieved from http://news.psu.edu/story/167304/2010/05/13/it-was-brawn-over-beauty-human-mating-competition. Sachs, A. (2009). The Truth about Women, Money and Relationships. Times Magazine. Retrieved from http://content.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1870066,00.html. Read More