Shakespeare's Henry V

Masters
Book Report/Review
Book Reports
Pages 6 (1506 words)
Download 0
English society in the Renaissance period had very clear-cut ideas about the role of the monarchy. Seen as God's representative on earth and appointed by divine right (Grillet 34), the monarch was not only highly revered by the populace, but was faced with the responsibility of acting in God's stead and of maintaining the requisite appearance (if not the reality) of state and ceremony, pomp and pageantry, grace and glory…

Introduction


According to Machiavelli, the ideal monarch should be a soldier (The Prince 49), merciful yet adequately cruel (55), cautious and prudent in decision-making, and full of humanity (56). King Henry V exceeds the expectations of the ideal Renaissance male, epitomizes the Machiavellian prince, and is a mirror of the character of God who appointed him, and the Messianic king, whom he represents. This is revealed in his speeches to his subjects and adversaries, to himself (soliloquies) and his future wife, Katherine.
In the play, as in the historical precedent, he is faced with the dually awesome and glorious decision of making war with France in order to reclaim his right as king thereof and extend his rule, but also, more frivolously, in response to a foolish slight on the part of the French Dauphin, who, thinking Henry to still be the author of "youthful pranks", sends him a set of tennis balls (I.ii). The portrait of this king that unfolds throughout the play is that of a young monarch who is defining his role, status, power and leadership, and who "must prove his fitness to rule through appropriate choices and actions" (Hall 83).
In the first act we see Henry contemplating the decision to go to war with France. Though the king, he defers graciously to age and wise counsel. ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related papers

Shakespeare's 'A Midsummer night's dream'
According to several critics, the theme of love developed in the play is of highest quality and the play is noted for the dark side of love. The unexpected twists and turns in the love relations of different characters in the play point to the dramatist's great skill creating love tension and Shakespeare is in complete control of the plot, characters, themes, and language, which makes him create a…
Shakespeares Henry V and The Rover
Behn persisted in writing plays until her works proved themselves worthy and her marginal status was somewhat reversed as she was accorded recognition as a playwright.…
Henry V and The Rover
In both dramas, the implications are, that without money, or what it represents in terms of status, wealth, possessions and impact on the people involved, certain events would either never have occurred, or might have turned out differently.…
Shakespeare's Henry V
According to Machiavelli, the ideal monarch should be a soldier (The Prince 49), merciful yet adequately cruel (55), cautious and prudent in decision-making, and full of humanity (56). King Henry V exceeds the expectations of the ideal Renaissance male, epitomizes the Machiavellian prince, and is a mirror of the character of God who appointed him, and the Messianic king, whom he represents. This…
Shakespeare's Measure for Measure
The extent to which the concept of justice is involved in the play can be determined individually as every person who has read or watched the play possesses his own perceptions regarding integrity of the play. It depends how the audience has perceived several critical issues which otherwise would not had considered by the then authors of Shakespeare's era. Like the concern for 'sexuality' in…
Shakespeare's Romeo & Juliet
His responsibility is mild compared to the accountability of other influences in the lovers' lives, including friends and parents and the idea of fate and fortune. Even Romeo and Juliet, can both be held responsible for the loss of their lives because of their irrational behaviour.…