This research evaluates and presents the meaning of property and water rights. The understanding of the meaning of property becomes problematic as properties can be owned by individuals, bodies of individuals such as partnerships and stock companies or those formed for non-profit…
The researcher states that questions regarding property become problematic when it comes to properties that stretch over the boundaries of many private properties (as well as public properties) owned by several owners such as water bodies like streams or rivers. Therefore, it worthwhile to analyze water rights in the light of property issues. McPherson states that property has different connotations in different contexts and he rightly argues that property is a right and not physical possession. For instance, a person may be in possession of a house on rent or for safekeeping on behalf of a friend or a landlord, but that does not mean that the current occupant is the owner of the property. Assuming that rights will settle the matter as to who owns the property there are several instances where the boundaries of rights can become confusing. One is where the property is described as a common one and the other is where the property in question is a water body. As McPherson purports everyone has an 'enforceable claim to use' common lands, public parks, city streets, highways. On the other hand, there are state-owned properties like for example, NASA or other properties owned by the state and federal governments. These properties do not provide the same rights to citizens as do common properties. Such properties are maintained for some specific purpose aimed at the benefit of the society or individual sections of the society and not for individual enjoyment. A court of law is an ideal example, which does not provide an enforceable claim to use sections of the property as in the case of a park or a highway. It may be used under certain conditions to address the rights of citizens to enforce law. The question here is where water bodies that cannot be defined clearly fall in the case of property rights. In an area where there is abundant rainfall or availability of common water bodies, this might not be much of an issue. But the case of the American West, where availability of water is more of an issue, the rights of property becomes an issue that needs legal and statutory assistance to find a settlement. Gillian and Brown, in their paper titled 'Instream flow protection' has discussed this issue in some detail, referring to the history of water disputes and laws right from the start of colonization of the country. For instance, the Spaniards followed their own domestic water laws which provide the property owner to use water flowing through their property. But public benefit would override private needs and in such an instance, the latter would prevail. British settlers, who back home had few problems with water, were not as well prepared. After attaining independence, different states in the union had to develop their own laws regarding management of water and most were made according to current demands at the time. For example, the California gold rush prompted lawmakers to allow property owners to use water for their own use. American law following British statutes aimed at implementing what is known as the Riparian law whereby any owner who has access to flowing water (watercourse) adjacent or through his property can make reasonable use of it for his own use. ...
Cite this document
(“Markets & Water rights Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/business/288829-markets-water-rights
(Markets & Water Rights Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words)
“Markets & Water Rights Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/business/288829-markets-water-rights.
Water in some parts of the world is considered a priced commodity as many people have to pay or travel many miles to avail of it. Others however opine that water as a priced commodity is not consistent with the right to water. There is also an inconsistency to these concepts which are considered by other theorists.
Water is abundant, but not all people realize that a large amount of water on Earth is not fresh water, and that water that is fit enough for drinking is not strategically placed for human consumption. Cooper reports that: “2.5 percent of Earth's water is fresh, and almost 99 percent of that small amount is locked up in the form of glaciers and permanent snow cover in the polar regions, or largely [nonrenewable] underground aquifers.” The main problem of water scarcity goes beyond the inadequate supply of freshwater for people at the right place and time, but includes the widespread inefficient use of existing limited water resources (Cooper).
However, there are dissenting voices such as the US, Israel and Canada that opposed and sought to fight this plan. One of the chief arguments that have been advanced in favour of the need to make the right to water legally binding is that the right to water and sanitation is derivable from the right to an adequate or decent standard of living.
A list of questions is posed to CalFed, an agency responsible for looking out for the Sacramento Delta waters. Based on findings on California Rivers and the Bay-Delta we put together ways to protect the Sacramento Delta limited resources, and improve water management.
These water rights are mainly intended to amplify economic competence of water use and to deal with the conflicts among the various users of the water resources. The most important water rights include the Riparian, prior appropriation, and the hybrid states (CA), and the most important dimensions of these water rights are concerning acquisition, enjoyment, loss, and transfer of water.
s of “the meaning of property “with reference to water is presented in the essay together with a further discussion about how these relate to riparian and prior appropriation water rights. Furthermore, the essay examines two water right systems for illustrations of
China has chosen marketization of the water sector to improve the efficiency of the management system. The reforms began with the establishment of the water law. The water law gave legal basis to the issue of water management. The
Therefore, the increased demand only leads to the inadequate supply (Puthenkalam 36). This scarcity has led to adverse effects. For instance, rivers located near farms barely reach the sea, and if they
The author states that it is imperative that arid governments and local communities look for way of providing their water for domestic as well as industrial use. Some of the arid areas of the world include the Northern United States which has a number of deserts such as the Sonoran desert that extends across several states and into Mexico.
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Markets & Water rights for FREE!