Article Rebuttal: Gay Marriage Gains Backer as Major Foe Revises Views by Ethan Bronner - Essay Example

The politics of same-sex marriage is deeper than a mere proclamation. There are numerous fault lines that are built due to the cultural issues in American politics (Rimmerman & Wilcox 2007). The gay rights law has expanded over the years increasing the members of the community to become large enough to fight for a separate seat in elections. What has really compelled opponents of same-sex marriage is the focus that gay marriage has received in the state court through their efforts. The community has managed to sponsor its case through major litigating groups such as “Lambda Legal in New York, GLAD in Boston, and NCLR in San Francisco”.

In the absence of these national groups the ACLU Gay and Lesbian Rights project gets involved (Rimmerman & Wilcox 2007). It is for this reason that the focus on same-sex marriage has increased in the recent years. Bronner states that the opponents are frequently requested to accept gay marriage as part of the American culture to the extent that even President Obama agreed to accept the new addition in the most welcoming manner. Mr. Blankenhorn, however, is not concerned with the ethics and morality of the act itself.

He believes that same-sex marriage is the major cause of the decline in general marriage patterns in society. He lays stress on the institution of marriage as being a healthy and significant part of society. He is merely using the language of morality when he speaks of marriage and indirectly, despite his denial, is addressing the religious or biblical justification for going against same-sex marriage (Bronner 2012). Mr. Blankenhorn indeed is giving the most unfortunate acceptance for the gay-marriage.

But what the author seems to overlook is the fact that the situation is not as simple as it may seem to be (Bronner 2012). The whole idea of marriage has largely evolved in recent years because of the pressure that the government is receiving from the heterosexual and homosexual communities. A person of Mr. Blankenhorn’s stature need to not fear that he would be regarded as anti-gay after all these years of voicing out the opposition to gay marriage. One can always hold the state court responsible but one also needs to recognize that in business nothing seems to remain secluded from the rest of the world. The opposition to gay-marriage no longer holds the same strength as before not because of the loss of arguments but because the business has been settled between two parties.