Business Ethics of Nuance Company - Essay Example

A business ethic is a behavior that a company adheres to in its day-to-day dealings with the world. Nuance’s solutions are used daily by businesses and people for services and tasks, like using a phone-based individual service to request account information, using voice to search for mobile web, dictating records, and working with PDF documents. However, there are several Nuance competitors who have developed business ethics that attempt to copy its work, hence flouting California’s anti-competition laws. This has, therefore, made the Nuance Company place lawsuits against its competitors with the aim of protecting its intellectual property (Rao, “Nuance Slaps Vlingo”).

Nuance Company has been experiencing a problem with its competitor where they attempt to copy its work. Nuance Company has been developing voice and imaging recognition technologies, which have enabled the company to emerge as a formidable competitor with a six billion dollar market cap. Nuance’s achievement in the market has, therefore, increased the number of competitive companies aiming at backsliding it in order to acquire its achievement level in the market (Rao, “Nuance Slaps Vlingo”). Vlingo Company is one of these competitors and has received support from AT&T, Charles River Ventures, and Yahoo in infringing on several Nuances’ patents. This infringement includes “U.S. patent no. 6, 487, 534, B1,” which relates to a “Distributed Client-Server Speech Recognition System,” “U.S. patent no. 6,785,653 B1,” “U.S. patent no. 6,839,669 B1,” “U.S. patent number No. 7,058,573 B1,” and “U.S. patent no. 7,127,393 B2.”

However, the dilemma experienced by the Nuance Company can be resolved through the use of California’s anti-competition laws and Patent law, to place a lawsuit against Vlingo Company and its supporters. California’s anti-competition laws are charged with a responsibility of protecting the intellectual property of many California companies, from being stolen or infringed by other companies. Through the use of these laws, Nuance Company can therefore get a chance of suing and pressing charges against Vlingo, AT&T, Charles River Ventures, and Yahoo for attempting to copy its work. The company can also use Vlingo, by using Patent Law meant for solving complaints that relate to patent infringement. The patent law of “35 U.S.C. §§ 1 et seq,” would charge Vlingo for committing an act of patent infringement. This law also identifies Nuance rights of ownership indicated in “U.S patent no. 6, 487, 534, B1;” “6,839,669 B1;” “7,058,573 B1;” and “7,127,393 B2.” These rights would therefore be used to claim damages caused by Vlingo (Rao, “Nuance Slaps Vlingo”)
In conclusion, this paper gives a clear description of Nuance Company, by highlighting its business ethics and how they benefit its customers.