Members of the organization should also participate in the determination of suitable corrective measures. Conversely, while using strategy evaluation there are variety of drawbacks in terms of consistency, consonance, feasibility, and advantage that affect is implementation in any organization, thus leading to unfavourable consequence.
One of the pitfalls that affect implementation of an organizational strategy is failure of the firm’s to focus. The organizational goal and objectives have to be consistent for the success of the strategy. When an organization fails to focus, its consistency in the market is also affected; thereby the organization ability to gain advantage fails (Outram, 2003). This pitfall leads to loss of profits thus, hampering implementation of the strategy. To correct this kind of drawback, the organization has to determine its objective and focus on it. To ensure that the organization maintains its focus, the management plays significant roles. As a result, the organization can maintain its consistency in provision or a product or service in which it specializes to produce or offer.
The second drawback that hampers strategy implementation in an organization is the incapability to nurture belief in its strategy. An organization trying to implement strategy in its operation without passion as a driving factor, will lead to failure of in implementing the intended strategy. This will deny the organization an advantage of creating a superior strategy against its competitors thus fails to ensure profitability as well (Outram, 2003). To correct this, organization has to demonstrate confidence in its culture and belief through effective communication with the intention to win its customers’ confidence.
Organization strategic evolution is likely to fail when the organization does not inculcate a sense of pace in its operations. Mainly, organization’s inability to inculcate a sense of pace will affect the