Authority and position based leadership can be perceived to be a rather inadequate tool for aiding modern day leadership in effectively tackling the challenges that leaders face today. According to Heifetz (251), this form of leadership is now largely perceived to be the myth of the lone warrior: the rather solitary individual whose individual brilliance and heroism serve to enable him to effectively lead the way, in a flawed notion that reinforces the leader’s isolation. This form of leadership was most often seen to be a characteristic of the autocratic leadership style that saw the leader try to exert individual control over all individual decisions with minimal input from the various group members. This leadership style is also seen to typically requires that the autocratic leaders make choices that are seen to be primarily based on their own individual judgments and ideals while rarely accepting any advice from the followers as the leadership style basically involves authoritarian, absolute control over a group of individuals (Gitman and McDaniel 162). While the leadership style can at times be beneficial in the case where decisions quickly need to be made without having to consult a large group of people, it is important for authoritative leaders to avoid being excessively dictatorial, bossy or controlling as this can result in various problems resulting in an impediment in their ability to efficiently adapt to the demands of today. Modern leadership is required to have the capacity of helping individuals learn a variety of new ways of solving, understanding and defining the often complex modern day problems and challenges that Heifetz (254) refers to as adaptive challenges. Heifetz, points out that the strategic challenge of modern leadership is seen to entail the giving back of work to people without being perceived to be abandoning them. If people are inadvertently overloaded, they will be seen to avoid learning while under-loading people will cause them to grow complacent or too dependent. Our world is currently faced with a series of various adoptive challenges that are found to be fundamental issues that communities must learn how to effectively cope with regardless of the actual nature that leadership might happen to take in the next century. Leaders and leadership must adapt and effectively handle these challenges as these challenges are largely not static and new ones always appear. It is thus seen that modern leadership is required to bear the actual weight of problems for considerable time durations. The shouldering of the various uncertainties and pains of an institution or organization, and particularly so, in times of distress is seen to part of the modern approach to leadership and can only be avoided at the institution’s peril (251). While the planned change theory with its premises of a deliberate decision being made to change, might have been appropriate and served to greatly aid leaders and leadership during the previous century, future leaders and leadership must essentially adopt the principles laid out in the unplanned change theory that will allow them to quickly react to their current environment and thus be able to adapt in an effective manner to the demands of
Name: University: Course: Tutor: Date: In What Ways Must Leaders and Leadership, Including how they are Developed, Still adapt to the Demands of Today? Modern developments are seen to necessitate the development and evolution of a new breed of leaders and leadership…
While the earlier theories tended to emphasize more on the behaviours and characteristics of the successful leaders; the theories generated later on focussed more on the followers roles and the contexts in which leadership prevailed. Majority of the theories are based on the individualistic perspective of the leaders.
Introduction “Liturgy is not adapted to culture, but culture to liturgy.” Such was the admonition of Fr. Aidan Kavanagh in his publication, “The Elements of Rite”. His remark also serves as some kind of commentary on the direction that reforms in liturgical forms and arrangements seem to be taking in relation to culture.
In addition, Hitchcock helped shape public opinion about various social issues, behaviors and phenomena such as feminism, voyeurism, and the role of men and women in society. Feminism is a theme that comes out strongly in Hitchcock’s movies, many of which contain a strong lead character who is female.
As the paper, Submitted to the Chairman, stresses the global financial crisis has created conditions where the leadership challenges have only compounded. The leaders have to be revolutionary and creative in their approaches. Informational learning through seminars and training programmes are no more effective.
The traditional leadership models and theories require updating in response to various interests and goals of stakeholders. However, due to the vast potentials for continued research on the subject, contemporary professionals in
Page had the privilege of becoming the company’s chief executive officer from the company’s inception to 2001. In the next 10 years that followed, Larry worked as the president of Google Products. In 2011, he took up the chief executive
Many people will argue that way. Some researchers have argued that leadership is a trait or behaviour. Leadership is a calling that comes from within, and cannot be forced. Leadership cannot be created, taught, learned, or promoted, just like Drucker argued that leaders
2 pages (500 words)Essay
Hire a pro to write a paper under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Apply my DISCOUNT
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you an essay for FREE
Contact us via Live Chat, call us at +16312120006or send an email to email@example.com