Humans possess an inherent capacity for self-improvement. Humans wanted to look and feel better at all times. With this in mind, by the end of the 20th century, self-improvement has grown into a huge, multinational commercial industry…
These enhancements have little to do with individual health. In Western cultures, body enhancement is used to strengthen individual image and personal marketability and celebrate the ability to achieve a better position in the consumer society.
Humans are social beings, and society causes profound effects on the individual perceptions of self. The mass culture of consumerism, mass media and changing social norms impose new requirements on society members. Different cultures foster different norms of self-enhancement and wellbeing. In the Western society, slender tanned bodies operate as vehicles of marketable self, the drivers of seduction, and the instruments of achieving a strong competitive advantage (Featherstone 1991). When I decided that I wanted to get rid of a few kilos, I did not realize the underlying meaning of self-enhancement practices. One day, I looked into the mirror and felt that the picture in the mirror differed greatly from what I wanted to see. I thought that getting rid of a few kilograms and making my body tanned would give me a sense of huge personal satisfaction. I was never afraid of challenges; moreover, I always sought to accomplish challenging missions. I thought that body enhancement through exercise and tanning would improve my physical appearance. I also felt that self-enhancement would strengthen my confidence that I was able to achieve a better result, keep myself fit, and control my appetite. This being said, I went to a fitness club and, three months later, I could not recognize myself. Tanned, slim, and fit, I looked several years younger. Friends and relatives would look surprised and envious at how I looked. Undoubtedly, the strategy I used to enhance my body was more than an instrument of physical improvement. It was just a tiny element of the broader cultural movement, where individuals use their physical attributes to market themselves and acquire a better social position/ status. Understanding self-enhancement For the purpose of this analysis, the concept of self-enhancement should be defined and analyzed. Since the concept of enhancement is difficult to define, it is easier to see what enhancement is not. Enhancement is not used to treat physical illnesses (DeGrazia 2005). It would be fair to assume that enhancement is a kind of intervention used “to improve human form or functioning beyond what is necessary to sustain and restore good health” (DeGrazia 2005, p.263). Simply stated, enhancement is never a response to medical needs; it is an instrument of enhancing individual abilities and physical form in the absence of clear medical needs (DeGrazia 2005). My decision to enhance the body had nothing to do with my physiological health. I felt perfect; what I needed was to fit in society’s body expectations. I wanted to exceed those expectations. I wanted to celebrate the cult of the human body. I wanted to make a positive difference and look better than the majority of my friends and peers. I know that body enhancement strategies like training and fitness are considered natural, positive, and virtuous (DeGrazia 2005). Fitness is the model of self-enhancement which, in most cases, lacks artificiality and is rarely condemned by society (DeGrazia 2005). Thus, self-enhancement lacks medical focus, provides a sense of self-satisfaction, and creates a positive image and public perception of ...
Cite this document
(“Body Theories, Practices and Culture Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/creative-writing/49111-the-body-theoriespracticescultures
(Body Theories, Practices and Culture Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
“Body Theories, Practices and Culture Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/creative-writing/49111-the-body-theoriespracticescultures.
It is viewed as a vehicle to many human functions, needs, and activities of daily living. Many have also utilized the body as a means for acquiring the desired and to achieve pleasure (e.g., sexuality and gender evolution). It is inarguable that the body has helped shape human identity (Benson, 2002, p.
In his study, Hebdige emphasize the way “conspicuous consumption,” or consumer behavior patterns with symbolic or ideological meaning, were reflected in punk subculture through style, fashion, and popular art. Despite advocating a revolutionary anarchist ideology, the punk movement is seen through this interpretation to function and evolve on the model of other fads, trends, and marketing campaigns of modern consumer capitalism.
These interventions often discuss uncomfortable scenarios regarding change practices as well as the financial integrity of the organization that leads to many psychological responses that are negative related to what is being received during discussion.
Culture throughout history has dictated beliefs, behaviors, and other characteristics familiar to the associates of a particular community. A person’s culture includes many societal aspects such as language, customs, values, rules, and technologies. Differences in culture mean diverse cultures having various values in which they believe in.
Management experts have long been interested in studying national cultures because of the impact they can have on the employees and in turn the on the organizational culture. Different theories and models explain national cultures by describing characteristics of cultures.
According to the study conducted, the profound ethnocentrism that Horace Miner used to portray the ‘oddity’ of the American culture is, in fact, an analytical instrument to identify which American elite or intellectual has the perfect view of American culture and the most appropriate remedy to its ‘illnesses’.
98). Organizational culture is primarily a set of shared basic assumptions, and is usually multidimensional. Different levels of this ‘culture’ comprise those aspects or elements that are valued by an organization. External adaptations as well as internal integration are two chief features of organizational culture.
Common sense too is a constituent factor of reality as based on it people generally interact with each other in everyday life situations. In other words, everyday life has normal and self-evident routines which are shared by people from the standpoint of commonsense knowledge.
This team of workers like the five different fingers in one’s hand will be different from one another having different characters, attitudes, education, background etc, etc…and the unison of these different humans under a single organization to