Post-War Policy and Meritocratic Education in England Introduction Has post-war policy made education in England more meritocratic? This seemingly simple question is actually confusing because as Sen (2000) has noted, the root word of meritocracy, ‘merit’ could mean many things, like intelligence, ability, or talent, thus the need to explain ‘meritocracy’ first…
These social policies are important because they both aim to achieve meritocracy and they are interrelated. The BNA 1948, in the course of its implementation, exposed the limitations of EA 1944 in its purpose to making English education more meritocratic. Furthermore, the impact of the BNA 1948 to the effectiveness of the EA 1944 and the need of the latter to address the need of the former illustrates the central role education had played in Britain’s post-war reconstruction (Tomlinson 2001). Understanding Meritocracy Meritocracy can be simply understood as promotion and inclusion based on merit – e.g., A meritocratic education system accepts, promotes, and rewards students based on ability, not on social status, ethnicity or gender (Llewellyn et al. 2008). However Sen (2000, p. 14) explains that it is actually the concept of ‘merit’, itself, which complicates the definition of meritocracy because “the rewarding… and the very concept of merit itself depend on the way we see a good society and the criteria we… assess the success and failures of societies.” It was after WWII that Britain started to walk the road of meritocracy. After Britain lost its world supremacy, it had no other recourse to survive international competition but to make better use of its human resources which for the past century were left wasted due to class discrimination. To do so, Young (1961) explains, Britain had to give up its century-old feudal principle of selection by family, and use instead the principle of selection by merit. Thus, Britain progressively opened its schools and industries to clever children and workers, giving equal opportunities for social mobility to those who have the ability and will to do so. Since meritocracy presupposes that boundless opportunities for success exist for all regardless of class, colour, ethnicity, and gender, many perceive meritocracy an ideal justice principle (Yuan 2013). On the contrary Young (1961, p.14) concludes that “the rate of social progress depends upon the degree to which power is matched with intelligence.” It is no different from the social class-based hierarchy of power, wherein power and wealth is distributed only to the few to the detriment of a wider group of ordinary people. The only difference is in meritocracy what matters is ability or intelligence. Eventually, elites of talents would be created, further justifying the socio-economic ladder more convincingly. Nonetheless, Allen (2011, p. 371) still asserts that meritocratic system is just on the basis that “social status was a direct expression of their intellectual worth. The system was now “just” because it was justly unequal.” Policy Review 1: British Nationality Act 1948 Introduction. Post-war migration to Britain, to Hansen’s (2000) analysis, is actually an issue of British citizenship, which the BNA 1948 legally conferred on Britons and ‘colonial’ British subjects, giving them equal rights to enter Britain and enjoy all the socio-economic-political benefits any Briton could legally enjoy. Although prior and subsequent to this Act were the British Nationality and Status of Aliens Act 1914 and BNA 1964, the BNA 1948, Hansen (2000) notes, was most influential because it had dramatically reoriented the British migration policy, ...
Cite this document
(“Has post war policy made education in England more meritocratic Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/education/109668-has-post-war-policy-made-education-in-england-more
(Has Post War Policy Made Education in England More Meritocratic Essay)
“Has Post War Policy Made Education in England More Meritocratic Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/education/109668-has-post-war-policy-made-education-in-england-more.
US Post Cold War Interventionism Foreign Policy
The interventionism foreign policy that United States adopted in the post Cold War era has left the country and citizens more insecure than ever before.
The country has spent billions of dollars, which unfortunately has not translated into tangible sense of security for American interests within and outside the country’s borders.
The war made it clear that the king would no longer be the undisputed leader of the people and would have to exercise checks and restraints in the use of his power. Even though universal franchise and modern democracy would take many more years to come into being, the civil war set into motion a process that led to the creation of the modern political processes and systems as one sees them today.
And it is considered as the second adjacent country in the European continent. Ukraine emerged as an independent state after the civil war. It had hostility towards Soviet and it led to the Soviet- Ukraine war, though the victory went to Soviet.
Those include, tuition fees of universities, debt pressures caused by it, cost of living which in turn affecting the academics of the student. To top it all, the government policies and decisions which decide on the status of all other issues.
According to a survey conducted by the Higher Education Policy Institute (Hepi), about 15000 students were surveyed including both first year and second year students.
After World War II, however, the world on the whole became different as the countries involved in combat focused on rebuilding their infrastructures, economies and fragile international relationships.
There were many different factors involved in the development of British post-war nationalism: the idea of modernity itself, literacy, the impact of the American media, urbanisation, regionalism, television and advertising campaigns.
This is still a major function of the public post - compulsory system. It this part of the tradition of FE, a tradition sustained as much by public as by professional values and beliefs, and in spite of there having been precious little investment by state and industry in vocational education.
Even though the relationship between United States and Soviet Union are observed in the perspective of post World War II experiences and in relation with Stalin’s expansionist policies, there are other influential factors.
It had hostility towards Soviet and it led to the Soviet- Ukraine war, though the victory went to Soviet. Then the Ukraine’s People’s Republic was under the control of Soviet and then Ukraine Soviet Socialist Republic was formed. It was to become one of the
Over time, however, it became clear that KFC would have to adjust operations strategies to cater to unique markets in order to avoid decline of its long-standing brand in a very saturated competitive marketplace domestically and internationally.
KFC requires utilisation of
Gulliver wishes to be like Houyhnhnms, a species that he thinks to be perfect. The rejection of him leads to break down because he cannot and will not ever perceive himself as yahoo. The first stage of madness begins
These monetary authorities use the monetary policies to control the amount of money in circulation within an economy through instruments such as interest rates. The main goal of manipulating the economy through monetary policies is to keep in check vital
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Has post war policy made education in England more meritocratic for FREE!