Ideal VLEs in Higher Education - Assignment Example

Virtual learning environments (Annetta et al, p. 64, are a type of e-learning technology; however, they have rapidly been able to control the educational e-learning environment. “Virtual learning environments are a single software product merging communication devices such as electronic post, notice board and chat room; collaboration devices such as online discussions, file sharing, personal organizers; content formation devices; appraisal devices and activity tracking devices; incorporation with institutional management information systems” (Annetta et al, p. 64, 2010); and controlled right of entry to course materials. As VLEs are becoming more and more similar in what they present, the use of VLEs varies among institutes, among faculties, and among courses (Annetta et al, p. 64, 2010). A little hype that addressed the influx of e-learning during the middle and end part of 1990s has provided way, substituted by an additional measured consideration of extent of the job concerned with facilitating e-learning to achieve its objectives. E-learning has to provide an educational knowledge similar to that of a lecture with a considerate and well-resourced instructor to huge numbers of students from geographically scattered as well as ‘socially diverse settings’ (Ragusa, p. 103, 2010). Attaining this creates challenges on region-wide, institutional as well as individual levels. All over the FE as well as HE divisions within England, ‘the Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC)’ (Ragusa, p. 103, 2010) is charged with important the pioneering application of technology. In addition to financing the JANET educational system, ‘Joint Information Systems Committee’ (Ragusa, p. 103, 2010) is as well dealing with educational matters in e-learning, and matter on scientific standards in addition to “interoperability” (Ragusa, p. 103, 2010), adding to growth of global values. The seamless progress of both organizational information and educational content between e learning systems is a most important challenge, and of vital significance, if the objective of learner-focused education is to be attained. Another region-wide problem is the support of most excellent tradition in “instructional design” (Weller, p. 33, 2007). In particular, it involves the organized growth of knowledge-giving systems, and it includes the complete expansion procedure from scrutiny of learning requirements, as well as objectives by the expansion of a delivery scheme to attain identified objectives. In addition, analysis has indicated that its basis is on an awareness of educational as well as instructional theory (Weller, p. 33, 2007). Moreover, it is an observation that educational design has been ignored due to lack of supplies and due to its anonymity. There is a common inclination in teaching to call attention to the technology-centric features with no regard for the education design development, and educational instructors do not put efforts in this respect, as they are likely to concentrate on common explanatory hypothetical forms, instead of goal-focussed forms of instant use to experts. At this point, a simple language designer’s practicum applying a state-of-the-art form of educational design is required. Teaching faculty complains about deficiency of knowledge of educational standards on the part of “educational designers, who pays attention on transmission instead of a ‘constructivist approach” (Gillespie et al, p. 78, 2007). At foundational stage the issues with e-learning are systemic instead of technical. What needed is grouping among the identified groups of interests, which are students, teachers and administrators. In addition, researchers (Gillespie et al, p. 78, 2007) have indicated that the internet has turned out to be three times less-useful for individuals with optical impairments than those without them. In the result, Virtual Learning Environments have been proven to be six times as hard to use as a result of their intricacy, as well as the belief that learning will take place in use. Supporters of user-focused design call attention to the need to support fine usability - at times termed universal design or design for everyone - contrasting to ease of access in remoteness. As a Virtual Learning Environment resource may be technically available, that does not indicate it will be functional. It has to be taken into consideration that Virtual Learning Environments are planned to facilitate people in learning. Usability issues in VLEs may only be temporary disturbance or irritation, although they may as well be the basis of cognitive burden, interruption on entire procedure, resulting in at least low standard of education and awfully, total dejection, as well as unwillingness to take part in any additional educational experiences (Orange & Hobbs, p. 28, 2000). Understanding is the main vital issue, as without extensive understanding of common concerns and requirements; there will be no stress to look for assets, as well as methods to ensure availability of the information on a Virtual Learning Environment or at a different place. At this moment in time, the majority of individuals, even if they are ready and concerned, would not be aware of the place to acquire “recommendation, information, or support” (Weiss et al, p. 419, 2006). This lack of understanding may seem astonishing in view of the fact that SENDA has been operational from the year 2001; easily reached education is part of the region’s quality review systems, and the concern of expanding FE/HE access to disabled students has been on the learning plan agenda for almost a decade. Institutional implementation of Virtual Learning Environments has put new stress on a number of services, which up till now may have participated at a lower level. In the United Kingdom, “the majority of Information Service units approve of Universities and Colleges Information Systems Association (UCISA)” (Secker, p. 120, 2004). UCISA offers a nationwide, as well as worldwide existence for the individuals who ensure functioning of information systems and services. It facilitates such individuals in sharing most excellent methods, take full advantage of cost effectiveness, generate plans as well as enlighten and support strategy making inside their institute, nationwide and worldwide. Briefly, it offers a discussion for “the HE Information Technology support community within the United Kingdom” (Secker, p. 120, 2004). During the early 2000s, UCISA became conscious about different concerns with reference to Virtual Learning Environments that were having a considerable impact on support services. They as well signify cultural confrontations for educational workforce, as well as students in the way they engage with their education as well as training (Secker, p. 120, 2004). Concerns relate to selecting a Virtual Learning Environment, its functioning, scientific support in addition to a complete range of support, guidance along with educational issues relating to its application. There is a prevailing stable condition in terms of “Central Information Technology Support units” (Tettegah & Calogne, p. 103, 2009) giving facilitation for system, as well as repairs. A comparable phase of support is provided by the units for scientific maintenance, as well as for managerial purposes. Moreover, for both scientific as well as organizational support, there is lack of support from “Distributed and Local support units and with extra support increasingly being offered by a committed Virtual Learning Environment Support unit” (Tettegah & Calogne, p. 103, 2009). As institutions implement centralised administration of Virtual Learning Environment policies, it is rational to look ahead to a similar tendency raising for scientific processes, possibly, a manifestation of organizational development in service delivery. During the year 2005, an extensive range of computerized connections was discovered between VLEs and information systems. “The greatest area of progress has been in the development of links with student records systems and the input of student module choices, and Intrallect also noted that integration with record systems represents the major priority for institutional learning strategies over the next two years” (Jane et al, p. 392, 2002). Beyond linking students teaching themselves, this technique intends to move towards educational jobs from the perspective of the students with exact results in consideration. E-learning supports this plan by offering a pool of jobs to start and by enabling individuals to replicate elements on their own level and as frequently as students want. Since the revolutionary times of e learning in addition to following exploration into its usefulness, it is an observation that “virtual classrooms” (Peachey et al, p. 138, 2010) on their own are not a satisfactory alternative for purposes of little groups and for as one-to-one education. Combined education is usually recognized to indicate a combination of “self-led, on-screen activities and live discussion groups or short courses” (Peachey et al, p. 138, 2010). Students have to do a little of their “learning as a group” (Peachey et al, p. 138, 2010). Perceptions are simply scrutinized by conversing with classmates, and even the “least competitive” (Peachey et al, p. 138, 2010) feel safer as they can assess their understanding as well as perception as compared to the rest of the group. Students of VLEs usually are concerned about attending their first class. On the other hand, they as well look ahead to know about their classmates and they are expected to mention this as the main advantage of the day. “Electronic bulletin boards work well if they are used to build on this meeting, but if the participants have never met face to face it can be a barrier to participation. You cannot join forces with somebody you do not know, have not met, and have not had coffee with. There are exceptions, such as the Law in a Box service, originally produced by Semple Piggot Rochez to support their online LLB programme, and arguably, students in distance-learning courses have made a decision to forgo element of social learning for reasons related to their personal circumstances” (Ure et al, p. 45, 2001). The ease of understanding of the subject is enhanced for individuals with particular requirements, and for part-time learners. It can as well make a distinction to individuals in a group who become skilled by their capability to view a video, or by working together within a virtual setting rather than within the traditional learning mode, or by replicating their educational course at their own speed Analysis has identified adequate evidence to illustrate that individuals gain from keenly engaging with their course. More particularly, benefits relate to response, preparation as well as customisation. This factor marks out the Virtual Learning Environment from other types of e learning as well as facilitates individuals to feel part of an educational society. Some of the major areas with higher rate of success are “appraisal, notice boards, extemporized teachings, stop-press items, and the provision to lengthen the module beyond the initial few training weeks of the first term” (Ertl, p. 329, 2010). The solution to forming a flourishing Virtual Learning Environment component is to discover an apparent requirement for officially authorized education to be provided on the internet. If no unambiguous requirement for alteration in existing teaching training or enhanced educational results exists, there will be restriction on the value of an online course (Clark & Kwinn, p. 231, 2007). General reasons for creating online tutorials in Virtual Learning Environment take account of the following: Time: Since the advancements in electronic resources in mid 1990s, law librarians (Clark & Kwinn, p. 231, 2007) use an escalating time in educating individuals. Usually, “services do not exist for lengthy group sittings integrating practical elements, and as a result, the same setting have to be repeated a number of times” (Clark & Kwinn, p. 231, 2007). By the implementation of VLE technology, there is a reduction in the number of hours of physical training Increase in distance learning for working students: “The altering demography of the student population” (Clark & Kwinn, p. 231, 2007) indicates a rising percentage of students have to combine professional life, personal life, and study. In this regard, VLE should allow students to study off the campus on their preferable period of time. Increment in the quantity of students: Several institutions appoint a professional or a small group of individuals to manage functions of the information service. As a result of increasing student numbers, employees’ expertise is in huge demand. In the result, online training of officially authorized education will lighten stress on employees’ schedule. Atmosphere: Physical structure may exist as a concern within the institute, and the services may not exist to provide practical guidance to huge numbers of students at the same time. An online course would take care of this problem (Ritke-Jones, p. 218, 2010). Ahead of forming a virtual course or resource, assessment of current training content is necessary for their appropriateness for inclusion in an online course. “Adapting existing materials saves time, as you need not reinvent the wheel” (Jacobson & Reimann, p. 201, 2010). “Practical sessions can be useful to solve access, technical, or password problems. Students often feel more comfortable asking questions in a face-to-face setting than seeking help remotely. Participants can experience frustration if they have access problems once they are away from the institution, and practical sessions ensure that students have a ‘kick start’ with the module” (Wang & Tsai, p. 211, 2011). One should expect the possibility that individuals will not be utilizing the online lesson during the virtual study. This can regularly be the case if a component is not obligatory. Even though the resources included in it are educational, as well as helpful, students frequently mention shortage of time and stress from necessary homework as causes for not utilizing supplementary materials to develop abilities in their personalities. In this regard, the most excellent method to support a “skills component” (Karacapilidis, p. 325, 2009) is by means of keen teaching staff boosting the status of the component with individuals. If it is not possible to attach the course to a training component in the institution, one can endorse the course to individuals at some point in the teaching sessions, on help points, as well as, by means of advertising inside the department. The majority of Virtual Learning Environments offer information about how regularly students can access the facts and figures within the VLE. Teachers can follow whether individuals are involved in the online course, as well as related materials by giving reviews online in addition to acquisition of quick responses. The communication services can promote teamwork between teacher and student as well as between student and student. Teacher and student can as well connect more keenly with one course at a time while considering suitability of both stakeholders. Information regarding course such as previous exam papers, schedules, as well as administrative information can all be found within one place, and are accessible from one reliable source. Implementation of a Virtual Learning Environment can save time for teachers by decreasing time needed for photocopying, course material circulation as well as revising course material. “The key advantage to using a Virtual Learning Environment is the ability to use it anywhere, any time and at any place. This is usually referred to as the Martini model. In addition, there is also evidence that using a VLE can increase attrition levels, decrease failure rates, and increase performance” (Karacapilidis, p. 325, 2009). With the intention of taking full advantage of a Virtual Learning Environment, one can accomplish the below-mentioned objectives: Exhibit a functional knowledge of plans of utilization for e-learning to fulfill realistic, as well as communal requirements in the course. Getting acquainted with the e-learning resources offered in the institution. This takes account of the organizational Virtual Learning Environment. Trying to find the opportunities and the constraints of a VL Environment when applied for education as well as for the facilitation of learning. Competent to offer and sustain virtual learning activities in different “programmes” (Bain, p. 99, 2010). The particular tools included in a Virtual Learning Environment vary from platform to platform, although ideal Virtual Learning Environments usually include “notice board, course outline, e mail tutor and students, conferences, class list and student homepages, assignments and quizzes, assessments and grade book, metadata, synchronize collaboration tools, multimedia resource repository, file upload area, calendar, search tools, bookmarking, and navigation model” (Li, p. 102, 2009). Notice boards as well as online forums promote online discussion and dialogue. Conversation areas can be connected to course material with the valuable utilization of online quizzes as well as self-assessments. Online schedules, diaries along with calendar offer a general idea of important events and can incorporate submission dates for reviews and reminders for face-to-face conferences. These can as well be related to the course material. Using an e-mail system in the Virtual Learning Environment allows communication regarding the course to be separated from other e-mail messages. Though, students may not wish to access the VLE mail system in addition to their private e-mail system. Therefore, it may be essential to integrate the VLE mail system with the educational mail system. Self-assessment tests can be utilized by students to give fast concept checking, whereas quizzes offer assistance for both the teacher as well as the students, as the results can draw attention to sectors that have not been completely known by the individuals. Quizzes as well let teachers to provide opinion, pointing out why an answer is correct or incorrect rather than just pointing out that an answer is fine or not. A Virtual Learning Environment can as well let assignments to be ‘submitted electronically’. This can show the time as well as date of submission, and assessment marks can be sent to students by e-mail or by any of the communication tools. Features, for instance, file upload, let teachers and students to share resources by distributing learning materials in the VLE (Burton, p. 65, 2009). ‘Whiteboard software’ is a practical method of visualising thoughts as well as concepts. Virtual Learning Environment users can draw images or equations and talk about them in ‘real time’ by means of the chat services. Cooperation such as this is mostly helpful in areas like structural design, manufacturing and the visual arts. Student tracking tools enable a teacher to record when a student accessed a course. It can as well be used to confirm that a student has right to use particular material. Virtual Learning Environments can as well be connected to other ‘online learning tools or directly to an institution’s library or educational centre’. References Annetta, Leonard A., Folta, E. and Klesath, M. 2010. V-Learning: Distance Education in the 21st Century through 3D Virtual Learning Environments. Springer. Bain, Amy. King, Renee and Frost-Hauck, Heather. 2010. Developing Virtual Learning Environments for Gifted and Talented Students. Pieces of Learning. Burton, Brian. 2009. Collaboration within Three Dimensional Virtual Learning Environments: The Impact on Student Success. VDM Verlag. Clark, Ruth C. and Kwinn, Ann. 2007. The New Virtual Classroom: Evidence-based Guidelines for Synchronous e-Learning. Pfeiffer. Ertl, Bernhard. 2010. E-Collaborative Knowledge Construction: Learning from Computer-Supported and Virtual Environments. IGI Global. Gillespie, H., Boulton, H., Hramiak, A. and Williamson, R. 2007. Learning and Teaching With Virtual Learning Environments. Learning Matters. Jacobson, Michael J. and Reimann, Peter. 2010. Designs for Learning Environments of the Future: International Perspectives from the Learning Sciences. Springer. Jane, L. C. Howlett, Robert J. Ichalkaranje, N. S. and Tonfon, G. 2002. Virtual Environments for Teaching & Learning. World Scientific Pub Co Inc. Karacapilidis, Nikos. 2009. Web-based Learning Solutions for Communities of Practice: Developing Virtual Environments for Social and Pedagogical Advancement. Information Science Reference. Li, Sha. 2009. The Threshold in the Distance Education Class: A Qualitative Case Study on Learning in a Virtual Learning Environment. VDM Verlag. Orange, Graham and Hobbs, Dave. 2000. International Perspectives on Tele-Education .and Virtual Learning Environments. Ashgate Publishing. Peachey, Anna. Gillen, Julia. Livingstone, Daniel and Smith-Robbins, Sarah. 2010. Researching Learning in Virtual Worlds. Springer. Ragusa, Angela T. 2010. Interaction in Communication Technologies and Virtual Learning Environments: Human Factors. Information Science Publishing. Ritke-Jones, William. 2010. Virtual Environments for Corporate Education: Employee Learning and Solutions. Business Science Reference. Secker, Jane. 2004. Electronic Resources in the Virtual Learning Environment. Chandos Publishing. Tettegah, Sharon and Calogne, Cynthia. 2009. Identity, Learning and Support in Virtual Environments. Sense Publishers. Ure, Jenny. Malins, Julian and Cullan, Lesley. 2001. Studiospace a Virtual Learning Environment for Teaching and Learning in Art and Design. Robert Gordon University. Wang, Xiangyu and Tsai, Jerry H. 2011. Collaborative Design in Virtual Environments. Springer. Weiss, Joel. Nolan, Jason. Hunsinger, Jeremy and Trifonas, Peter. 2006. International Handbook of Virtual Learning Environments. Springer. Weller, M. 2007. Virtual Learning Environments: Using, Choosing and Developing your VLE. Routledge. Read More