The complexity and challenges of school systems today are such that no one leader can meet the demands of daily leadership responsibilities. The previously held idea of the principal as an all-knowing leader has become traditional and obsolete. …
Hence, the role of the principal has gone beyond managing the daily affairs of the school and supervising teachers, to include knowledge in, and management of other areas of expertise such as data analysis, professional development, development of learning organizations within the school, mentoring of staff, and political tasks. (Ritchie & Woods, 2007) Principals are constantly faced with high demands to increase student achievement in accordance with the mandate of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (Jaimes, 2010).
The challenge is critical in inner city high schools where interest in learning has declined and schools have become factories for student dropouts (Canada, 2010). In such situations, a single leader–centered school cannot manage many aspects of school structures as effectively and in a timely manner as one in which leadership roles are distributed among key staff (Angelle, 2010). School administrators have three roles that include managerial, political and instructional (Spillane and Diamond, 2007). As a manager, the principal is faced with budgeting, hiring, school planning, scheduling and building maintenance. His instructional roles include teacher supervision and evaluation, facilitating of professional growth, instructional planning and the developing of the school’s vision and mission statements, power distributions, staff member negotiations, creation of alliances and building coalitions with stakeholders. (Muijs & Harris, 2007) The decline of interest in schools, the lack of motivation to learn, and the widening achievement gap in the standardized tests, have brought the need to take a closer look at ways to improve the nation’s school system. Educators and researchers of educational leadership have embraced a re-think of leadership practice as a collective effort. (Lieberman et al., 2007) The focus of educators may have increased with the increased need for accountability system, but the importance of collaboration remains paramount to school success (Angelle, 2010). Distributed leadership (DL) evolved as the need to improve student achievement increased, and the financial resources to accommodate more administrators decreased. Distributed leadership (DL) has been defined by many writers as shared leadership, capacity building, and transformational leadership (Leithwood and Jantzi, 2003). Spillane (2005) defines DL as a leadership that is built on the interaction of leaders and their followers as they execute their leadership tasks. According to Hirsh & Hord, (2008), distributed leadership is a leadership practice that allows an organization to benefit from the combined expertise and joint interaction of school leaders and their followers as they utilize material and operational artifacts to work collaboratively toward a common goal so that the outcome is greater than the sum of their individual actions (Hogan, 2007; Spillane, 2005). This type of leadership involves giving staff members, most times identified as teacher leaders, some leadership responsibilities and authority to act, while the principal assumes the role of architect of the organization. Distributing leadership is achieved by weaving teachers into the organizational structures of the school so that everyone understands his ...
Cite this document
(“Distributed Leadership in Small Learning Communities: Effect on Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/education/4011-distributed-leadership-in-small-learning
(Distributed Leadership in Small Learning Communities: Effect on Essay)
“Distributed Leadership in Small Learning Communities: Effect on Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/education/4011-distributed-leadership-in-small-learning.
Educational leaders are facing challenges in their organizations that will require them to manage, change, and transform their organizations. According to Leithwood (2008), leadership is not so much a stand-alone function as a catalyst for other functions.
In Science class, the difference between average grades of the two classes made only 0.23333 points. The average of the small class was 86, one of the large class – 85.76667. So, this may lead to an assumption that a smaller number of students really contributes to the academic success of the children.
The ability to have effective leadership in schools is one which is also essential to creating the right alternatives for learning and opportunities for students and the school system. It has been found that there are a variety of dimensions associated with effective leadership and the importance it holds within schools.
Qualities of effectiveness and efficiency of an approach are indicated by the level of retention, capacity to keep learners interested for long periods, and the overall performance of learners in analyses of their learning experience. There are two main approaches to learning which are the cooperative learning approach and the individualistic or competitive approach.
I was engaged in experimental activities where I encountered tough interpretations and I had to think critically and multi- dimensionally to come up with the best solutions. Through group activities, I realized that challenges and conflicts exist everywhere and it is our responsibility to handle them with understanding (Gibbs, 1988).
The specific courses I teach are NVQ 2 Food and Drink Service, NVQ 3 Hospitality Supervision and BTEC Nationals in Hospitality. The focus of my assignment is teaching NVQ both in the college and in the work place. Different assessment methods are used in the above-mentioned areas.
But this distinction does not hold good anymore. Leadership and management have become one and the same. Leaders have be good managers and managers have to be effective leaders.
When we watch a flock of geese across the sky, the flock mostly takes the shape of a broad 'V'.
Existing literature also assumes that there is no difference in the factors that influence job satisfaction between those in business and industry and those in the teaching profession.
This study is about teacher job satisfaction in small school districts and the relationship between teacher satisfaction and student achievement.
Wise distribution of resources is necessary in managing student flows, as well as public funds. With the many variables involved that it is necessary to have a reliable information system to facilitate policy-making (Unesco.org). Two of the intentions of school funds are for technology and library media as they are envisioned to enhance interest in learning, and therefore upgrade student achievement.
This assessment is valid even if the statistics digest claimed success in the way the US educational system has been managed for the last 20 years.
As per the description of the US Department of Education (2009), reading scores are from zero to 500. The students
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Distributed Leadership in Small Learning Communities: Effect on Student Achievement for FREE!