The first amendment to the US Constitution prohibits the making of any law respecting an establishment of religion, impeding the free exercise of religion, abridging the freedom of speech, infringing on the freedom of the press, interfering with the right to peaceably assemble…
But how can it be coercion?
Those against the Pledge say that, like prayer in the classroom, is completely unconstitutional. But according to the first amendment of the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights, it states just the opposite. The Constitution states that whether or not these are religious exercises, they shall not be impeded.
No one forces students to partake in the saying of the Pledge of Allegiance and schools do not give preferential treatment to those that do. However, if a school decides to have an election for a student to present a message at a sports event of the school, then they should be able to. If, the student chooses to say a prayer so be it.
Religion is stamped all over history. From the earliest days of man to the Holocaust to the Spanish Inquisition to the Reformation and to the Founding Fathers of our great Nation, religion was always there and prevalent in society. Thus, a student will never escape religion in his studies.
In conclusion, if a person tries to stamp out prayer or the Pledge of Allegiance in schools by saying it is unconstitutional, then they are going to have to over haul all of the history texts that students study. Studying history may coerce our students into believing that there is a ...
Cite this document
(“The First Amendment and Its Impact on Education Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/education/458849-the-first-amendment-and-its-impact-on-education
(The First Amendment and Its Impact on Education Essay)
“The First Amendment and Its Impact on Education Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/education/458849-the-first-amendment-and-its-impact-on-education.
Hague v. Committee for Industrial Organization, 307 U.S. 496 (1939) http://supreme.justia.com/us/307/496/case.html This case involved the freedom of assembly as it has to do with controlling whether or not a certain group could meet in public places. The mayor of Jersey City wanted to stop labor meetings from occurring, and so he used a city ordinance about Communist groups to try and forbid them to gather.
While trying his best to make sense of the lecture, he became frustrated and yelled “Fuck history. I hate history and all this bullshit. I don’t even know why we need to learn this shit. I am damn sure that our government is bunch of corrupt fools.” Entire class burst into laughter except our history teacher.
This is a common misconception. Some people think they have the right to say whatever they want to or about whomever they choose without fear of legal retribution. This is not true. The First Amendment defines freedom for the U.S. separating it from many other nations that do not allow free speech but not all speech is protected, an important distinction among other aspects of speech this discussion will investigate.
Freedom of expression not only encompasses the rights to freedom of speech and freedom of the press, but also the right to assemble as well as to appeal to the government in case of complaints. The First Amendment, which was implemented in 1791, stated that the congress would not create any law respecting formation of religion, or barring the open exercise thereof; or shortening the openness of speech, or of the press; or the moral of the citizens peaceably to collect, and to request the Government for a redress of complaints.
On the surface, this Amendment seems to provide a lot of benefits to the American society. For example: media has the freedom to provide information to the citizens of US, and the citizens of US are free to fight for their rights that might be violated by the government through changes in constitution.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the Freedom of Speech or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances
The new American settlers brought with them a desire for democracy and openness. They left behind a history of tyranny and official control of information. Using this experience as their guide, the constitutional fathers wrote into their new Constitution a Bill of Rights, which contained the First Amendment.
According to them, the Congress must pass on legislation to chop off the amount of spam. 2 Spam messages are used to flood e-mailboxes, all over the internet. They sell everything that can be from sex to education. It is communicated with the internet users either by sending bulk of mails or through the posting of newsgroups, carrying to the internet mailing list.
It gives them the right to make public opinions, news and information without any meddling from the government. It grants people the right to gather and march in public, demonstrate, protest and carry signs to express their
This case involves the complaint to a mass mailer of sexually explicit pamphlets. It is part of an advertising campaign to sell books. But those who received them became angry and offended. So they filed a
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic The First Amendment and Its Impact on Education for FREE!