College sports play an integral role in higher education by promoting student unity, maintaining connections with alumni, and enhancing the overall student experience. College athletic teams offer benefits to prospective students as a unique educational opportunity for those who…
For quite some time, there has been an extensive debate over payment of athletes, with each party in the debate presenting valid opinions that cannot be overlooked. It is essential to consider both the pros and cons of paying the athletes in order to come up with an objective decision. It is no secret that athletes earn their relative institutions high amounts of revenue. College athletes generate millions of dollars for their colleges and are required to be content with scholarships they enjoy (Griffin 19). This beats the principle of equity, and the athletes are, therefore, entitled to the revenue they generated.
Athletes are exposed to risks that pertain to health, arising from the setting and nature of games and sports they take part in. These athletes, all around the young age of 22 or so, end their college careers with injured bodies, muscles that have repeatedly been shot up with cortisone injections, conditions such as prediabetes and prehypertension, and - in the case of the linemen - waistlines of 45 to 50 inches. The average career for a NFL player is only a few years, depending on the position. Early injuries in the transition from college to professional are a substantial reason, given that they have often compromised their bodies and health just to reach the NFL in the first place. This presents a case to pay college athletes to compensate them for the risks they face and also so that they can be able to access best medical care as well as have a balanced diet (Griffin 43).
To be successful in any athletic competition, considerable investment of time and effort is paramount. This forces athletes to sacrifice their time in college and ensure that they adequately train in order to enhance their talent and give them a competitive edge. They do so while ensuring that they do not neglect their academic work, at times creating study time tables so as to be at par with their classmates, which creates an extra strenuous ...
Cite this document
(“Should college athletes be paid Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/education/527053-should-college-athletes-be-paid
(Should College Athletes Be Paid Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
“Should College Athletes Be Paid Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/education/527053-should-college-athletes-be-paid.
This study gave an insight into the ethical notions existing between athletes and colleges, and it gave many evidences, which proved that idea of paying to college athletes is correct because its advantages are more for every individual of the society. It reflects the notion of equality, human rights, value of hard work and most importantly significance of justice in the society.
College Athletes Should be Paid to Play. College athletes are at a severe financial disadvantage compared to other students and therefore should be paid at least a stipend by the university. Students not involved in sports are able to obtain part-time employment in order to purchase necessary peripheral items such as toiletries, clothing, school related incidentals and perhaps a pizza on the weekend.
[Your full name] [Instructor’s name] [Course name and code] July 16, 2011 With the increased danger of physical disability, College football players should be paid to play. Although every game that is played in schools and colleges, like soccer, volleyball, and football, has the risk of physical injury to the players, but increase in physical disability to players while playing football has put forward a hot debate as to whether or not the college football players should be paid to play.
Media coverage and newspapers bring forth the events clearly, creating fame and recognition of athletes by the fans. Players on the other side are awarded fringe benefits, which may constitute a college education, insurances and much more (Griffin 73). According to the provisions of the media coverage, college sports are considered an important event with various institutions claiming the best awards and the stakes being high on publicity and profile.
However , it is normally seen that the athletes or sportsmen are not given much consideration when it comes to upholding their rights When it comes to my college ,I have seen that our college athletes are not given due respect in regard to their rewarding.
Recently the NCAA board of directors with the backing of Mark Emmert, the president of NCAA agreed to pay Division one athlete a stipend of $2000 (Nocera 1). However, Emmert insisted that they will not move to a pay for play model as this would convert student athletes to university employees.
Hanging from special racks are jerseys, sweatshirts and other types of clothing of various types and sizes, geared for men and women, all featuring the most popular football player’s jersey number. Off campus, in local clothing stores, many of these same
University of South Carolina football coach, Steve Spurrier, says that NCAA should make changes in their policy and should pay college football players “a $300 stipend every game” (qtd. in Rizk). This speech of Spurrier’s has given