In the paper “The Teacher with Tough Standards: Honesty” the author discusses a case where Ms. Christine Pelton, a teacher at Piper High School gave her students a project to write for their botany class. This was a botany class for sophomores…
The students understood that what they did was wrong. This is because Ms. Pelton had warned them about using papers from the internet and submitting them as their own. She had also told them about the consequences of such an action should it happen. The students also signed a contract agreeing to the said penalty. Despite the fact that the Piper High School handbook on plagiarism offered no explanation, the warning given by Ms. Pelton was enough for students to understand that such an action was wrong. However, they did not understand its extent and consequences because it was not clearly explained in the school`s handbook of plagiarism (Infantino & Wilke, 2009). The penalty was not appropriate. Despite the fact that the penalty could have been expected or correct with respect to the warning that Ms. Pelton gave to the students, it was not appropriate because of certain issues. first, the school`s handbook on plagiarism had not defined clearly whether such a penalty would be given to offenses like this one. It offered no explanation for the penalty. This made it unclear for students pertaining to what they could or not use the internet. She did not refer to the school`s handbook of plagiarism. Ms. ...
For this to happen, there should be a procedure and plan to be followed. In addition, the teacher responsible for the subject should be consulted. The board did not do any of this. Instead, the board made this decision as a way to resolve the problem. Therefore, the modification is unjustified (Reeves, 2001). Parents are part of the school community. This means that they have the right to be included in the school`s decisions. In the same way, they have a right to complain or express their concern when their children`s performance is affected. The conduct of the parents is justifiable and appropriate under these circumstances. They expressed their dissatisfaction with regard to the manner in which their children`s projects were handled. They acted within their mandate. When the principal and school district superintendent backed Ms. Pelton`s decision, they appealed to the board of the school. They gave reasons and explained why they thought the penalty was unfair. Therefore, parents did all they could to ensure that their children do not get a harsh penalty for a mistake not explained clearly in the handbook of plagiarism (Lathrop & Foss, 2005). A senior from Piper High school, in an interview with CBS News, said, “It probably sounds twisted, but I would say that in this day and age, cheating is almost not wrong.” (Jennings, 2008) ...
Cite this document
(“The Teacher with Tough Standards: Honesty Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/education/57145-the-teacher-with-tough-standards-honesty
(The Teacher With Tough Standards: Honesty Essay)
“The Teacher With Tough Standards: Honesty Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/education/57145-the-teacher-with-tough-standards-honesty.
The purpose of this paper is to prove the thesis that Honesty in the dictionary sense is not the best policy.
The online dictionary definition of honesty implies "fairness and straightforwardness of conduct".
In fact, they also present livelihood of genders in a way that is not enthusiastically comprehensible in requisites of conventional notions, though this term is not used for including the transsexuals, whereby the transgender entails a political connotation with a stance in the Anglo United States that offers resistance to the medial pathologization.
Academic honesty can bear the definition of tolerable conduct or behavior that occurs in relation to formal academic exercise. It thus hinders disgusting behaviors such as cheating, forgery, and plagiarism all of which emanate from dishonesty. It is a principle which when adhered to can lead to the betterment of one’s character as well as the institution’s impression.
Academic honesty has become highly relevant in today's context, when the advent of technology like internet, has made it easier for people to access wide ranging information and literatures. Academic honesty basically refers to the scholars' fair intention to acknowledge the works of other scholars while putting forth their own interpretation on the issues and ideologies.
These same depression facilitation variables quickly exacerbate the negative effects of depression through synthesized and in many cases tandem continuity factors. If left undeterred, increased depression amongst African American women could lead to significant increases in the suicide ratio amongst African American women due to depression based factors.
Stimulates student reflection on prior knowledge and links new ideas to already familiar ideas, making connections to students experiences, providing opportunities for active engagement, manipulation, and testing of ideas and materials, and encouraging students to assume
eptember) the common core state standards for literacy in history, social studies, science, English language arts and technical subjects, from kindergarten to grade twelve. Retrieved on April 11, 2012 from
Plagiarism is the cautious presentation of work or ideas as a whole or part of an already existing publication. On the other hand, cheating is the act of receiving information by any other means contrary to the instructed by the examiner during
3 Pages(750 words)Assignment
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic The Teacher with Tough Standards: Honesty for FREE!