Explaining on, Henley et al (2009; p.32-34) state that “this classification process assumes that assigning a student a categorical name implies knowledge about the characteristics of the student's learning problem.” This means that the essential reason for labeling students is to help educators in quickly or easily identifying the students by their disability level so that the needed support can be given to them outright. Because of this, there are traditional labels such as mild, moderate and severe intellectual disability. The question that has however revolved around most circles of educational literature is whether or not labeling has lived to its purpose and whether or not labeling is still relevant today. Foreman (2009) and Thompson et al (2009) approach the subject from their own perspectives. Without any doubt the two writers under review through a lot of point for the practice of labeling of students with disability. In the case of Thompson et al (2009) for instance, the writers revisit the fact that for the sake of successful classification or labeling to take place, educators have always been very particular with measurement exercises. Foreman (2009) also mentions that labeling or classification leads to support enhancement. Clearly if for the sake of labeling educators will be very serious with academic measurement exercises, it means that there will be a true reflection of what each and every student represents and what each and every student made up of so that eventual placement for educational and professional courses will be effective. Again, once students with mental disability are labeled, if helps in dishing out the most precise and prescribed support for their educational needs. Indeed there is a traditional saying that a drug used to treat boils cannot be used to treat stomach ache. This is to mean that treatment that is needed by a student with a certain level or degree of mental disability will not be appropriate for a student with a different degree of mental disability. From this perspective, both groups of writers admit that labeling is useful. The concerns of the writers however do not end with the fact that labeling has its own advantages. The writers delved very deep into the potential disadvantages of scrutinized the argument whether or not the essence of labeling is being carried out in modern schools successfully. Out of the scrutiny, the writers raise the awareness that labeling may have some advantages but the practice has actually out lived its usefulness. They also hold the view that labeling is wrongfully being applied and that the needed methodical approaches are not being followed in the use of labeling of mentally disabled students. In one breadth, Thompson et al (2009) seriously question if there are no more accommodating means of identifying students with mental disability and giving them the support they need other than labeling. The simple reason that the writers advocate this is that labeling is lately taking away the essence for which it was institutionalized. For instance by the mere fact that students are labeled, they become widely set apart from their colleagues and the natural world around them. It must not be forgotten that the fact that students have some degrees of mental disability does not mean they are total non-functional. This means that such students would definitely have questions for themselves as to why they are being set apart. This way, instead of helping
Intellectual Disability Because the educational right of people is a fundamental human right, the need to educate people with intellectual disability has even been championed at a global perspective level with bodies such as the United Nations International Children Emergency (UNICEF) hailing the practice…
The complaint objected to the similarities of packaging and the use of comparison lists to inform retailers which of the perfumes were intended to copy the fragrance of the original L’Oreal perfumes. The High Court Chancery Division came out with a decision in 2006 that stated that the action generally failed although it admitted that there were violations in three instances.1 Not entirely agreeing with the High Court’s position, the Court of Appeal did not decide on some issues when the case was appealed to it and instead referred them to the European Court of Justice.
Resisting Disability Epithets
The case entitled “Resisting Disability Epithets” proffered pertinent issues relative to the communication issues frequently exemplified by employees of Hermit Life and Auto, especially the disability epithets that has been bothering one of its, personnel, Stacey.
In this competitive era, it is necessary to provide some protection against illegally duplicating products, by various copyrights or patent or intellectual rights, to the inventor or creator. This limits the duplicity of the original
Examples of industries that may require intellectual property protection include: Writers, film making, artists, musicians, pharmaceutical, computer software designing, web developers, telecommunications and so on. A company may sue another company working
These enquiries are overlapping concept, in many segments it is useful to analyse these procedures in respect to the branches of action (McCann, Hugh, 1998). The theories of the firms, based on social welfare, rationality and social choice has been defined as the substantial
The conclusion from this study states that the cases of disability impact families and the careers to a great extent. The financial strain is one of the areas where respective parties are forced to undergo while trying to provide treatment, education, and general care to the disabled person. Other areas of concern include stress and depression from burnout and seclusion or resentment from the society.
could be used.
This video is subject to copyright owned by the American Society Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ASPRS). Any reproduction or republication of all or part of this video is expressly prohibited unless ASPRS
An express contract involves an agreement where the terms are stated by the parties orally or in written form. The contract reflects the intention of the parties in agreement (US Legal, 2015). For example, John wants to purchase a house.
3 pages (750 words)Assignment
Hire a pro to write a paper under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Apply my DISCOUNT
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you an essay for FREE
Contact us via Live Chat, call us at +16312120006or send an email to email@example.com