There are a number of foremost arguments that are can be highlighted. There is a usual connection between lesson learned and evaluation. Lesson learned is perceived as form of project evaluation as it comprises the determination of significance, value, or quality (Thomas, 2011). There are a number of ways that project evaluation and lesson learned can be undertaken, and comparatively speaking, may be an efficient and adequate way based on the situation. Different organizations may explain lesson learned in a number of ways.
The book asserts that project management sections are made up of specified features that are highlighted in the Project Management Body of Knowledge. These features are presumed to be significant to attaining a widespread view on the Project Life Cycle activities (Thomas, 2011). It highlights how lesson learned can be undertaken wholesomely to establish effect or formatively to deal with enhancements. Moreover, evaluative knowledge is assumed to be the idea that tries to offer the required depth level to undertake evaluative decisions. Individuals are also supposed to posses both behavioral and technical competency development strategies. The author indicates that lesson learned can be employed in specified situations based on the organizational needs and can also be employed for several applications.
It asserts that finding lessons should comprise open communication processes in every section of the organization. It argues that a number of techniques should be utilized to gain lessons, and electronic techniques should be utilized wherever applicable (Thomas, 2011). Moreover, conventions and file names should be developed for the published and repository for contributors to comprehend the rationale. Presentation techniques are regarded as essential in conveying messages. The author goes on to assert that individuals are mostly willing and ready to adapt lessons that are seen as valuable. Moreover, ...Show more