An educational leader should have the ability to understand himself and develop sufficient self-confidence. Whenever a person develops believe in himself, he or she has the ability to fulfill many things. Those educational leaders who have self-confidence do not get scared or nervous when placed in a position that challenges them to make decisions. In this perspective, they should know how they are supposed to start each day to lead the school, the students as well as their fellow teachers. This way, they would be able to help them accomplish the desired goals of a classroom as well as the school. A good educational leader should be in possession of excellent communication skills. It is not possible for a leader to head a particular group if he is unable to communicate with them. A good leader is able to reach a large number of people through various ways. For example, the principal may have a face-to-face conversation with his subordinates every week as well as send them email updates every day (Chiappetta, 2004). An education leader is supposed to be resourceful and open to new ideas. For example, with the improvement of technology and the prevailing economic times, educators should be open to new concepts for them to change the classroom or educational environment. Additionally, an educational leader should learn how to use the resources that available. A good leader does not just set his own way, but he uses the information available to him and applies to the future resources.
An author of the essay "Articulating The Importance Of Leadership On School" claims that teachers should be able to set good examples even if they are not the leaders of their school. This is because they serve as the classroom leaders, and this is an essential role…
They are also liable for maintaining and implementing organizational instructions and working procedures. It is in this context that leaders perform as representatives of organizations who play a major role in serving the association for its betterment through the development of a cooperative and coordinated relationship among their subordinate employees.
This research advances with a pragmatic understanding of effective performance management in that it considers a variety of critical perspectives and attempts to situate them within a context that attests to the nature of what constitutes an effective performance management system.
It also gives a short review of the primary theories of leadership used for profit and non-profit organizations and their applications in business settings. Also enlighten the strength and weakness of contemporary leadership models. There is also a brief explanation of affect of power and influence, gender issue, corporate culture, personal values, globalization and outcome performances on the leadership.
In order to face this challenge an organization has to adopt the culture of an organization that is under the process of continuous learning and is regarded as a learning organization and to adopt this culture, transformational form of leadership is very necessary.
Through communication, we can understand people’s behaviors, cultures, and sociability. Good communication can improve our lives since we can build better relationships and better understanding. On the other hand, poor communication creates many adverse issues that may include broken and negative relationships, low productivity in companies, and world disintegration.
Strategic management as a system of thought has appeared as a result of the necessity to systematize the already existing knowledge in the field of creating business strategies, and many scholars were able to create whole theories about the instruments of decision making in the strategic management.
According to Sadler (2003 p, 2), in the recent past, process of development of people for top jobs was seen as a management or executive development. In an environment that is predictable and relatively stable, organisations found it adequate to have people doing the functions of management.
However, it is essential to distinguish the two basic differences in the strategic management research – while one focuses on the research of the content of the strategic management ideas, the other makes the process of strategic management its object, and