This process happens in stages and does not take place in one instance. This entails that it happens in defining stages that are dependant Brackett, (Kremenitzer, & Maurer, 2011). For the process to be successful, there must be proper mechanisms that ensure that each stage is followed. After successfully undergoing through this process, change is usually experienced
Corporative learning is addressed based on two aspects. Academic and social learning, these are then organized based on classroom activities. Corporative learning differs from group work, therefore, it takes structural interdependence. Practically, it involves students that take up tasks collectively towards a particular academic goal. This mode of learning is considered to be better placed than individual learning since individual learning takes up a competitive edge. When students are involved in a group, each one capitalizes on the resource presented. A corporative learning setup enables students to ask for information and also evaluate the one at hand.
The corporative learning mode has been credited by numerous authors. Its accreditation is drawn from the numerous benefits that have been resultant. Proper adoption of this mode of learning makes the success of a group to become shared amongst the members. In this model, workload is decreased as a result of role adjustments. Teachers are seen as facilitators, their normal role as information givers changes to facilitators.
This model was first introduced by social theorists, before world war two. Notable authors that contributed to its establishment include Allport, Shaw, Watson, and Mead. This group established corporative learning after prior research that indicated that corporative learning is more effective with regards to quantity, quality and the general productivity.
Social emotional learning is an all-inclusive term that covers all aspects pertaining to life skills. This covers other