The limitations of the behaviourist approach to the study of learning, with reference to Chomsky’s critique of skinner Name Institutional affiliation Tutor Date The limitations of the behaviourist approach to the study of learning, with reference to Chomsky’s critique of skinner 1.0…
Chomsky’s works have been rated as the most influential pieces in the study of psychology particularly concerning behaviourism. In this case, a lot of transformations were witnessed amongst learners who studied the language. With his works labelled as classics, and having all the evidence in regard to the study of language, as opposed to behaviourism that is too general, this work shall aim to understand the limitations of the behaviourist approach, with the reference to Skinner. 2.0. Body In the views of Noam Chomsky, the aspect of behaviour cannot be understood in the study of B.F. Skinner’s operant conditioning. According to the thoughts of Routledge & Chapman (2005) Chomsky indicates that Skinner’s work is the worst ever written in the history of psychology. In this case, Chomsky indicates that his work comprises tangible evidence and conclusions as compared to the behaviourism standpoint. First, Chomsky argues against the viewpoint of Skinner’s learning through operant conditioning by arguing that one cannot study the behaviour of an individual, but not the components under study. The psychologists in this case, must not rely on the existing evidence and the abilities portrayed by the individuals, but the psychologists must go a step ahead and analyze the contents of the brain of the persons under study. From the brain, the researchers are likely to understand how the behaviours portrayed by the individuals have come into practicality. The brain, according to Chomsky (2006), is the root of the behaviours portrayed by the individual. The behaviours are simply a replica of the processes that go on in the individuals’ brain and cannot be alienated from the end product that is the behaviours of the individuals (Chomsky, 2006). In relation to Chomsky, Skinner went for end product- the behaviours portrayed- without getting to the grounds in which the behaviour has its roots. According to Altmann & Gaskell (2007), Chomsky emphasises that study of the brain gives evidence of the behaviours portrayed by the individuals. In his work, Chomsky compares the study of behaviour to referring to Physics as readings in Science without considering the fact that the readings are mere data collected after an occurrence of a certain experiment by the learners or scientists in the laboratory (Randall, 2007). The study, analysis, testing and comparisons of data in the study of any field are compulsory. The end product cannot be alienated from its components; thus, the study of behaviour by Chomsky holds much evidence as compared to Skinner’s study on operant conditioning and learning. On another view point, Chomsky indicates that yet another limitation of Skinner’s behaviourist approach is that he relied so much on speculations as compared to critical study of the conditional behaviour. Scheer (2010) indicates that Skinner applied experimental investigations that had unfounded experimental techniques that would have led to his study to having valid evidence on human behaviour. The limited significance of the techniques led to the coming up with the premise that behaviour cannot rely on inferences, but critical analysis of facts. According to Shackelford & Vonk (2012), Chomsky holds the view that language can only be understood in relation to Information ...
Cite this document
(“The Limitations of the Behaviourist Approach to the Study of Learning, Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/education/64267-discuss-the-limitations-of-the-behaviourist
(The Limitations of the Behaviourist Approach to the Study of Learning, Essay)
“The Limitations of the Behaviourist Approach to the Study of Learning, Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/education/64267-discuss-the-limitations-of-the-behaviourist.
Watson and enduring until cognitive psychology became popular in the late 1950s.The significance of behaviorism was diminished by the cognitive revolution. The term “cognitive psychology” came into use with the publication of the book Cognitive Psychology by Ulric Neisser in 1967. Since then, the cognitive approach became the dominant research line of inquiry in the most fields of psychological research.
The way gender was constructed proved to be an important dimension of the care situation. Using feminist and end of life-course approaches, the study concluded that specific cultural affected the relationship of these women with their daughters, and this in turn had implications for their experience of receiving care.
Asynchronous learning or offline learning refers to student- centered learning process which allows time viability and information sharing feasibility to learners. To be more specific, in asynchronous learning process, a teacher and a student do not have to be online at the same time, and it surpasses the geographical constraints as well.
Behaviorism is primarily concerned with the noticeable and measurable features of human actions (Tennant, 1997). Therefore, when actions become undesirable, they can be destroyed or deterred. Behaviorism regards development as an endless process in which learners play a relatively passive role.
It offers different ways of demonstrating concepts, assessing progress and assigning projects. Neil Postman proposed that the technology is related to culture. According to him, this relation is one which culture is perceived as subservient to and managed by both visible and invisible technologies.
Although the quest continues up to now, the most obvious outcome of the efforts is the constantly confirmed fact that human personalities are extremely complex, and there are only few areas that can be understood with an acceptable degree of accuracy. Each theory or set of theories that claimed to discover the underlying factors that determine human behaviour has been later dismissed for some or other reasons.
Growing competitiveness in the market forces modern companies increasingly rely on skilled and highly qualified personnel then on technologies and products. Increasing attention to human resources has recently called into being a new set of methods, principles, techniques, and practices known as Human Resource Management (HRM), Human Resource Planning (HRP) and Human Resource Development (HRD) (Beardwell, Claydon & Holden, 2003; Reid, Barrington & Brown, 2004).
Still, learning is the only way that people survive and stay relevant in the competitive world. As such, one would expect knowledge acquisition to be an active process. However, the truth is that many platforms where such is offered still employ passive approaches that make learning a boring but necessary undertaking.
Behaviorism regards development as an endless process in which learners play a relatively passive role. It is a general approach used in a variety of settings including both scientific and educational. This paper presents a contrast of the
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic The Limitations of the Behaviourist Approach to the Study of Learning, with Reference to Chomsky's Critique of Skinner for FREE!