This means that increasing requirements for one to enter into the teaching fraternity or to determine whether one is an effective teacher does not lead getting effective teachers. In any case, some untrained teachers have gone to become as effective, some even more effective than graduate teachers.
This means that the government and other stake holders need to adopt other ways that will ensure that the teachers that are brought into the systems are effective. As noted, looking at their paper qualifications only is not enough.
For a number of years now, the quality of elementary as well as secondary education being offered in the United States is said to be faltering. Due to the worries that the public education that is being offered by most education centers, more so public ones, the authorities are seeking different ways that will ensure that the quality of education being offered is improved. If they fail to do this, poor education standards will definitely affect the productivity of the country.
Traditionally, one policy that the stakeholders have been using in their attempt to improve the quality of education that is offered by the teachers in raising the hurdle to become one. The qualifications to enter the profession have been increasing with time. A good example is the No Child Should Be Left Behind act that sort to ensure that the academic qualifications of teachers who teach core subjects is increased. This means that teachers who teach core subjects are highly qualified, judging by the papers that they have (Gordon, Kane, &Staiger, 2006).
When these teachers are already employed, there are very few measures that are taken to monitor their productivity. Non performing teachers are not involuntarily discontinued with work while, performing teachers are not motivated. Also, career development programs initiated by the relevant stake holders are very rare. This means ...Show more