Kentucky staate funding - Essay Example

Kentucky Funding Policies Kentucky Funding Globally, most countries recognize education as a withstanding pillar of freedom, democracy, and economic sustainability. Due to such reasons, Kentucky has always been in the history due to its stand in education as a critical component for young members of the society and the future generation. In order to meet valid requirements in education, Kentucky government has taken up equal opportunity to alleviate challenges in education by funding all public schools sufficiently to improve the curriculum in varied subjects as moderated through well trained personnel’s.

Additionally, funding has also been supported by district leaders who feel there is a need to support low-income students while emphasizing on the need for equity and fairness among all citizens of the state clarifies (Ellis, 2011). Some of the past and the current funding policies for Kentucky include Free or reduced-price school lunch benefits: Having lagged behind in educational initiatives by around 1990, Kentucky State under commonwealth initiative introduced an economic reform system. The system could see funding of students from low-income districts receiving financial support from the government based on fairness and equity throughout the whole state (Ellis, 2011).

Allocation of less funding for higher education: In the past, Kentucky instituted a policy that was aimed at allocating minimal funding to higher education. The state decided to reduce spending in higher education between the periods 1992 to 1993 (Ellis, 2011). Despite the fact that the policy was being visualized by some of the state economist as idea to inflict recession at the national level, it became so important in generation of more revenue to the state. Distribution policy: The council of the state government also came up with education distribution act.

The distribution act was based on a formula that mainly targeted funding needs of higher education for Governors and General Assembly. The benchmark for the above model constituted a statistical procedure that only contained 20 nationally reported institutions (Ellis, 2011).Currently, it is impressive to note that the government has put in place new policies targeting to enhance performance at Kentucky schools, which have over the years attribute to high performance at both K-12 and high educational programs states (Welner & Chi, 2008).

Tuition and Fees Revenue Standard Deduction: The tuition fee revenue policy was set up later by the end of the year 2001 and again reversed in 2008 clarifies (Welner & Chi, 2008). Having been set by the state council, the institution established standard tuition and fee revenue deduction of 37 % from public universities purposely to determine the state appropriate objective.System finance education policy: After having failed to pass finance education legislation in 1990, education finance policy was reinstated in the year 2008 to address educational problems arising from the state.

The policy then provided horizontal equity and capital outlay at $ 100 per student in the form of grants to support disadvantaged student in every district school (Welner & Chi, 2008). Conclusively, Kentucky government has put in place school facility and equity policy that is aimed at funding rural schools such as Alaska in restoration of physical facilities such as sewer line and buildings. According to Welner & Ch, (2008), all the above policies have played an influence to the state in various ways.

However, each and every policy has contributed differently towards the realization of better education within Kentucky State. For instance, positive students’ outcomes have been influenced by fees reduction and free lunch benefits since students gets optimum time to concentrate on studies other than meals. In addition, the distribution policy has greatly influenced equity and partisanship amongst all the school going children of the state. Ultimately, school facility and equity policy that aims at creating districts equity has been evidenced at Alaska district schools after having gotten its social amenities funded.

References:Ellis, W. E. (2011). A history of education in Kentucky. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky.Welner, K & Chi, W (2008). Current issues in education policy and the law. Charlotte, N.C: Information Age Pub.