Nucci’s book is divided into two parts and is primarily designed to present both theory and research relating to a demonstration of morality forms that foundation for social values inherent in the educating of children today. The approach of the book is to illustrate how…
pose of helping teachers learn to better deal with areas of student discipline, to integrate certain moral and social values based education into the classroom curriculum, and to contribute to children being able to develop their own moral self. This book also moves beyond basic concepts relative to moral development and begins a scholarly discusses related to various controversial issues in the field of education and society today. Among these are include the relationship between morality and religious rules, in addition to the role that cultural variation plays in the development of moral values. Through this discussion, the author presents a great deal of findings uncovered through research and theory, avoiding any type of focus on individual ideology.
Larry Nucci has a Ph.D. in Psychology and is currently an adjunct professor at the University of California, Santa Cruz. His research focus has long been on better understanding how children develop both socially and morally through education. One of his many areas of interest, in particular, rests in working to determine how children make judgments about issues that they consider to be personal issues and warranting of a certain level of privacy and discretion. The research he has conducted in this area has primarily been conduct in diverse cultures, with a particular focus on Latin American and the Asian continent. In more recent times, he has narrowed his research focus somewhat to cover the assessment of moral and social reasoning as it related to the integration of a more comprehensive curriculum of moral education, in particular in relation to how teachers are prepared to enter the profession.
In the past, Dr. Nucci has been a recipient of a Fulbright Fellowship. In addition to this accomplishment, he has been given grants from multiple foundations, among them the S.D. Bechtel Jr. Foundation, the Fetzer Foundation, the Templeton Foundation, and the Character Education Partnership. In addition to ...
Cite this document
(“Education in the moral domain Book Report/Review”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/education/737985-education-in-the-moral-domain
(Education in the Moral Domain Book Report/Review)
“Education in the Moral Domain Book Report/Review”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/education/737985-education-in-the-moral-domain.
In the present days, learning English is considered as one of the significant aspects of education for adult immigrants. For immigrants in the United States, English is considered as second language and improper understanding of English creates language barrier for them with those people who have English as their first language.
It is a book by an intellectual, trying to understand what the borders of spirituality are, but unable to reach it. Spirituality is all about experiencing and it transcending mind-level reasoning. The book, however, from the secular point of view, is the foundation stone for the later works of Adam Smith on the subjects of ethics, philosophy, psychology, politics, justice, economics, arms and methodological underpinnings.
According to the paper the role of educators in molding students to become responsible and rational members of the society they live in can therefore not be overlooked. In as much as institutions should have their framework for morality like prayers, guidance and conduct requirements, it is important that the teachers have individual morality objectives.
As the New Labour claims, "[t]he key to a successful economy was to be knowledge and education", thus educational reform plays a crucial role in the development of British society (Tomlinson, 2001, p.88). Given its importance, this essay therefore aims to assess the achievements of reforms in England's educational system in light of the then political, economic and social conditions at the time.
The latter part of the essay addresses a naturalistic interpretation of Hume's reconciling project. The essay here looks in detail at the complexities of Hume's idea of freedom and asks what kind of freedom it is that he sees as sufficient for moral responsibility.
This paper will focus on the strategies used for justifying moral theories, as this is generally where the theorists go their separate ways in constructing the supreme principle of morality. As such each theory may yield different answers to the three questions raised under morality: 1) Authoritative question: Why ought I be moral 2) Substantive question: Which interest ought I to take favourable account of 3) Distributive question: Whose interest ought I to take favourable account of
The basic motive of this project is to analyze Michael Tooley’s article, “Moral Status of Cloning Humans”. He says that the idea or theory of genetic determinism is not correct, therefore, cloning to produce persons cannot be labeled intrinsically wrong. Tooley further asserts that not only is cloning not immoral, but it can help us improve our lives.
Professor Clayton came up with the Disruptive innovation system while Professor Porter came up with the integrative innovation model. They both have valid arguments on their models but only one of them can be employed in
4 Pages(1000 words)Book Report/Review
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Book Report/Review on topic Education in the moral domain for FREE!