Fredrickson highlights that in the early years of the United States revolution, racism was based on dominant whites who were superior, and lower class blacks, Indians and Asian communities who were inferior. However, this changed over time and people were further distinguished with their faiths and cultures (Fredrickson). This moved racism to a level of distinguishing people on their natural characteristics and abilities that affected their American citizenship status. This paper will highlight the recalculation of the definition of self-evident truth from the works of Thomas Jefferson and John Locke. The works of john Jefferson have been renowned for the famous philosophy of the self-evident truth. This developed in the political revolution of the United States towards independence from the British, and the main emphasis was equality of all men. This term was first used in writing of the declaration of independence, which was a document that signified unity of the country. The purpose of the document according to him was to unite the country into one shared philosophy of the ‘American Mind’. This is regarded as one of the foundations of American Revolution because it changed the politics of the country (Cannole). Jefferson’s definition of self-evident truth Jefferson argued that politics is the band that would equally unite all the people in the country and assume powers over it (Cannole). He alluded to the philosophy of upholding natural laws which were bestowed by God to every individual and respect for every person’s opinions. The definition of self-evident truth was centered on the natural understanding that God created all men equally because they have equal natural rights to life, liberty and happiness (Cannole). These natural rights were what Jefferson referred to as Self-evident truth because there was no need of proofing these rights. In addition, activists had also advocated for them, and people in the country knew them. Further, these philosophies were being taught in religions such as Christianity where all men were said to be equal (Cannole). Jefferson related the self-evident truth with governance by stating that the people formed governments and its power came from them too. The government formed on this belief would be mandated to secure the natural rights of the people, which are self-evident. Failure to safeguard the self-evident truth will lead to dissolution on the government since it does not serve the purpose. This philosophy was intended to change the political landscape of the country from British colonization and oppression such as slavery, discrimination and injustice. The dominant and in-dominant groups Discrimination of people into races in the country was prevalent during the revolution, and the whites were said to be the dominant groups and the rest were referred to as in-dominant or subordinate groups. They were divided in classes and status where a hierarchy existed. Fields highlights that the dominant groups secure huge shares of power and money while subordinate groups receive unfavorable things, and they have a hierarchy (95). The dominant and subordinate groups existed in the British Northern American colonies, and the British extorted the Native American and black people through slavery in tobacco farms which benefited the whites. The Native American
Author’s Name October 23rd 2012 How George M. Fredrickson recalculated the definition of self-evident truth The origin of slavery dates back to the early civilization of American and European continents. It is through the early trade and social interactions that the United States has people from different races and ethnic groups…
The modern day America is a multicultural country and is admittedly plagued with accusations of racial inequality primarily on the grounds of ‘colorline’ (Fredrickson, The Black Image 633). This essay seeks to elaborate the race expert and history scholar Fredrickson’s reinvented definition of self-evident truths as a comparison to Thomas Jefferson’s original conception of self-evident truths.
This is reflected in his thought about social contract and government by consent whereby he delineated the extent of the power of the government and stressed the right of an individual; that if the government fails to protect life, property and liberty, then the people has the right to replace it with a new one (Witherspoon Institute).
Name Instructor Course Date How George Fredrickson would explain Sherman Alexie’s essay Fredrickson examines the ethnic relations and racial categories that have been in existence in the American history. These ethnic relations have been changing depending on time and the political background of America.
Through the early portion of his argument, Frederickson expressed belief that these self-evident truths derive their contexts based on the existing order of the day which is alterable. Later findings, however, rendered him to come up with a modification acknowledging that times under evolution do not only consist of change process via ethnic relations, but since movements in the aim to advance civil rights emerged as well at various points in history, their heavy criticisms upon the four models of social change managed to recalculate the view of self-evident truths.
Truthfully, being contained in such realization creates a personal understanding of one as to what his or her existence is for and how that role affects other people in the society.
In terms of kinship, Linda Stone mentions of the need for one to identify the truth behind the roles that men and women take in the process of reproduction and how each one perceives this role differently as they intend to establish relationships between each other.
This can be attributed to facts that the ideas did not appear as principles that could define the notion. This notion had a number of themes that included the destiny in the name of God to attend to all
For instance, the white Indians, black Americans and Asians inhabit some areas in America. Throughout its history, America has been in constant efforts to expand its territorial boundaries to the west and to other geographical locations. The idea of expansion brings in
the early portion of his argument, Frederickson expressed belief that these self-evident truths derive their contexts based on the existing order of the day which is alterable. Later findings, however, rendered him to come up with a modification acknowledging that times under
This was aimed at the preservation of their cultural patterns with the aim of banding together for mutual protection and aid against the uncertainties of hostile and strange American environments (Sarat & Thomas 122).
The three main
As such, the theory is mostly identified with the need to conform to ideologies of assimilation as were practiced in America. The melting pot theory is characterized by the viewpoint of idealistic and generous overtones used in the attainment of
1 pages (250 words)Essay
Hire a pro to write a paper under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Apply my DISCOUNT
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you an essay for FREE
Contact us via Live Chat, call us at +16312120006or send an email to firstname.lastname@example.org