Standardized Testing - Essay Example

A non-standardized test, on the other hand, is the opposite of a standardized test. This type of testing gives notably different tests to diverse test takers, or administers the same test under extensively different conditions. For instance, a non-standardized test might occur when one group is offered far less time to tackle the test than another group. It might also occur when one group evaluates a test differently than another group for instance when the same answer is regarded right for one scholar, but incorrect for another scholar.

Standardized tests are considered as being fairer when compared to non-standardized tests (Butler & Stevens, 2009). The steadiness also permits more reliable contrast of outcomes across every test taker. Standardized tests, due to their fairness, should be regarded as the best way of testing English Language Learners. This paper will, hence, seek to support the argument that standardized tests are the best way of testing English Language Learners. When it comes to English Language Learners, standardized testing should be considered as the best way of assessing their understanding (Coltrane, 2009).

This is due to a lot of reasons that will be explained later in this paper. It is essential to discuss the pros and cons of standardized testing in order to understand the significance of standardized testing to English Language Learners. Standardized testing holds educators, schools, as well as their ELLs, accountable. Perhaps the best benefit of standardized testing is that educators and their respective schools are responsible for training their English Language Learners what they are needed to be familiar with for these standardized tests.

This is mainly because these scores turn into public record and educators, as well as their respective schools, who do not perform as expected can come under severe scrutiny. This scrutiny might lead to losing of jobs and in some situations a school might be shut or run by the state (Coltrane, 2009). Standardized testing also allows English Language Learners or ordinary students located in different districts, schools, or even states to be compared. If it were not for standardized testing, this contrast would not be possible.

Students from public schools in Texas are all needed to do standardized tests at the same time, whether an ELL or not. This implies that a learner in Amarillo may be compared to a learner in Dallas. Being capable of accurately comparing data is priceless, and this is why that the Common Core Standards for each state have been developed. These will grant a more precise comparison between every state (Flores & Trumbull, 2002). Another advantage of using standardized testing with regards to English Language Learners is that standardized testing is naturally accompanied by a set of well-known standards or instructional framework that provide educators with help for when and what needs to be taught.

Without this arrangement, a third grade tutor and a sixth grade educator could be teaching a similar content to their English Language Learners (Menken, 2008). Having this curriculum also keeps ELLs who shift from one district school to another from being far ahead or behind their new institution. Standardized tests are also objective in reality (Flores & Trumbull, 2002). Classroom grades set by a tutor are at the very least simply subjective in reality. Standardized tes