The study aims at investigating some of the key factors that have facilitated in the intensive use of corporal punishment in America public schools despite of the existence of policy that bans employment of corporal punishment in public schools. …
Although United States of America has made noticeable progress in addressing challenges that are associated with corporal punishment in public schools, human rights activists have observed that, a lot of work need to be done in order to effectively protect children against violation of their basic right. Moreover, present corporal policies prohibit use of corporal punishment by teachers and other school administrators. According to the existing policies, any form of corporal punishment against students is illegal and anyone or professional who engages in such kind of punishment should face severe legal punishment. In addition to the existing policy that bans corporal punishment in schools, the country’s constitution has a provision that defines the role of federal government in regard to protecting children basic rights. By referring to the existing law, all children in the country ought to be brought up in a proper environment that enhances human dignity and freedom. According to United States of America constitution, everyone who is less than 18 years is children who require maximum protection from the government. As described by the existing policies, all America children must be protected from illegal or harmful practices as well as intentional physical injuries. As states in the existing law, nobody in the society including teachers or parent is entitled to corporally punish children (Rankin & Wells, 2011). However, although there are effective laws that protect children basic rights, the implementation of these policies has become a common hindrance towards the realization of the full benefit of these policies. Lack of effective implementation of corporal policies significantly reduced...
This report stresses that based on the available information, it is factual to state that, there is very close relationship between administrative acceptance and current nature of corporal punishment in American public schools. Teachers and school administrators assumes that, corporal punishment is the only effective ways of punishing children in public learning institutions. Moreover, schools administrators do no deal effectively with parents complains. There is also ineffective communication between parents and teachers in regard to children punishment. Lack of effective and immediate sanction on teachers and other school administrators who violate the existing policy on corporal punishment can as well be associated with corporal punishment.
This paper makes a conclusion that the existing literature review has found a very close relationship between social acceptance and corporal punishment both in school and at home. Incidences such as approval of corporal punishment in America schools by parents, poor follow up and lack of effective mechanism of reporting cases of corporal punishment have also significantly contributed to the increasing cases of corporal punishment in public schools in America. Moreover, although corporal punishment is seen as useful means of punishing children, a good number of parents and policy makers do not recognize corporal punishment as the most effective mean of punishing children. ...
Cite this document
(“State Laws on Corporal Punishment Research Paper”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/education/86216-state-laws-on-corporal-punishment
(State Laws on Corporal Punishment Research Paper)
“State Laws on Corporal Punishment Research Paper”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/education/86216-state-laws-on-corporal-punishment.
This practice is termed as corporal punishment and many Nepal people advocate for it based on Hindu teachings that state that children should get tadana which means reprimanding by beating in order to shape their lives. Year after year students across the world have been subjected to corporal punishment.
For over the years, the problem has been the focus of the stakeholders as they try to find ways of addressing the problem. Teachers, parents, students, and educators have been involved in various ways in trying to find solution to the problem. The law makers have also not been left behind; lawmakers in many states have different views regarding how to address the problem of indiscipline in US public schools (Lenta, 2012).
Most of the Southern states are among the 19 states that have not yet banned it. The first U.S state to place a ban on corporal punishment was New Jersey way back in 1867 which was preceded by Massachusetts in
The most effective research methodology in examining the nature and side effects of corporal punishment is relying on mix methodology (qualitative and quantitative research methodologies). Qualitative research method collects information that is not numerical in nature.
There are those who hold the view that corporal punishment is a proved and tested way of achieving this end (Dayton, 2009). There are those who believe that corporal punishment should not be allowed in public schools as a way of instilling
The history of this topic can be traced back to the American Revolution. It has been practiced in the US public schools since the American Revolution (Alexander and Alexander, 2012). While that may be the case, it
the student waits until the last minute before he works on the assignment, a not-so-well-drafted paper will be the result even though the student can actually do better. However, when a student prepares well enough, he could create a good essay even if he is not known to be a
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Research Paper on topic State Laws on Corporal Punishment for FREE!