You must have Credits on your Balance to download this sample
Ethical Theories and National Security
Engineering and Construction
Pages 5 (1255 words)
Name Professor Course Name Date Comparing and contrasting Utilitarianism, Deontology, and Ethical Egoism Theories Utilitarianism is referred to as an ethical hypothesis creating particular rules of behavior and positions the significance of correct and immoral behaviors on the end result of decide a particular accomplishment or plan of action above the rest.
In act utilitarianism, opinions of function are involved straightforwardly and openly to every option of the state of affairs. Consequently, the operation of performance bringing the finest and excellent effect is regarded as correct. Opinions of function in rule utilitarianism are incorporated in the determination of resolutions of the strength and legitimacy or ethical behavior (White and Klein 33). Therefore, in rule utilitarianism, an action is regarded as correct and acceptable or erroneous in regard to whether ethical behavior was involved or not. Deontological theories are principled assumptions creating particular rules of behavior and position the significance of whether an action is correct or erroneous in accordance to the rule of law and ethical standards. Deontology theories are categorized in to monistic and pluralistic deontology. Monistic deontology was proposed by Kant and it stipulates that deeds of accomplishment in compliance or meeting the requirements of being correct and legitimate conducted logically and under good judgment are considered the embodiment of ethically admirable and commendable deeds. However, on a critical point of view, monistic opinions lack an approach or technique or determining solutions to a disagreement. Under monistic deontology, a common rule may congeal to become an unconditional rule. ...
Not exactly what you need?