Firstly, considering one of the codes of ethics indicated, if I am an engineer on a private practice, I may help the other engineer in interpreting the said project but I will not give false views and corrections as a form of injuring the reputation of the more experienced engineer. Moreover, even though I found some technical mistakes and found out that the project did not compensate the price being paid by the companies, I will remain neutral on the issue and will never attempt to make known my findings. However, if both of us or the three of us work for the government, as provided under the codes of ethics, if required, I will help in the interpretation and review of the project but there should be no statements that will damage my colleague’s reputation. In addition, I will not attempt to scrutinize the project of another engineer to gain confidence or a sense of superiority, instead, I would tell the young engineer to make some valid suggestions and forward it to the other engineer.
2. As a professional engineer, it is my responsibility to deliver correct, accurate and credible study on a certain material that will be produced by a certain company either for public information or consumption. If for instance, I would predict that there is something hazy or unclear and needs to be resolved, I would have to inform the companies or authorities concerned. First, I will make a presentation or I will explain to the company my findings about the potential problems or the questions underlying the said study. Since I have found out that there is still a need to undergo another deeper investigation, I will inform them about the problem and how this can be solved. I will make a proposal stating the need for an additional fund that includes the reason, the benefits and the necessary inputs needed for the resolution. This may show rundown of numbers to clearly explain to them where the money is to be used. As a professional engineer, it is my utmost responsibility to ensure safety and quality of life. Since I have found out something that I believed to be a potential threat for quality, then the best way to address this is to inform the authorities about your findings and present to them your solutions for these problems. 3. This particular case has a lot of concern. First, there is a manifestation of a risk for safety. Second, there is a potential conflict of interest in view of the fact that a certain component for the project has been seen to be not savvy enough and might cause the public safety. Consider this, “Engineers shall hold paramount the safety, health and welfare of the public”. In view of this fact, it is the responsibility of the engineer to ensure that the project will be safety for public use and consumption. However, since there was a malicious thing revolving, and consider that “If engineers' judgment is overruled under circumstances that endanger life or property, they shall notify their employer or client and such other authority as may be appropriate.”. Considering this, first I will present to the authorities the study that I have found out especially those findings concerning the safety and the durability of the materials being used. I will not disregard the issue; instead, firstly, I will talk to the project manager and inform him that there is a possibility of malfunction that might occur considering that there were some technical issues discovered like the computer controller card that does not allow software to procure certain features. Similarly, I will talk to the customer so that they will also know why the project will take more time and why there is a need for additional funds. 4. This case has something to do with prestige and money. The concerns are first, the company ABC has taken advantage of an engineering service to develop a next-generation product that will revolutionize the industry. ABS took