However, the question remains: who is the one responsible for the death of Manuel Ortega? First issue questionable in the video was the hiring of the engineer Fred Martinez. He was a consultant of the competing company such that he is knowledgeable of confidential information about ChemiToil. Although it has been clarified that Fred did not sign any legal papers that restricts him from sharing secrets from ChemiToil, there is a difference between doing something illegal with doing something unethical. If Engineer Martinez revealed classified information to Phaust, he would have disobeyed the rule of practice stating that “Engineers shall not reveal facts, data, or information without the prior consent of the client or employer except as authorized or required by law or this Code (NSPE, 2007)” even if he is no longer en employee of ChemiToil. The fact, however, that Phaust has to formulate their own recipe for paint remover suggests that Fred did not disclose sensitive information from his former clients. It was also clarified that Fred designed the plant based on the preliminary documents from Chuck and Wally; not from the design of ChemiToil. These imply that the engineer did not do anything unethical regarding this issue of confidentiality. The next debatable issue came when 20 percent of the budget was cut off. The stress brought about by this event evidently caused the decisions that later lead to the death of their colleague. Fred did his job by clarifying to his bosses that there is a possibility for the project to be unsuccessful. However, it is also stated under the Code of Ethics that “If the client or employer insists on such unprofessional conduct, (the engineer) shall notify the proper authorities and withdraw from further service on the project (NSPE, 2007)”. Fred should not have let his boss Wally oppress him into following orders instead of making sure proper measures were implemented for the safety on the plant. The most alarming part of the whole video was when Wally talked to Fred about how everything is just about business and profit. He insisted that they should blindly follow orders from higher bosses. This part showed that the money restrictions were not only due to economic reasons but for personal gain. Wally risked the quality of the construction just to make sure that the employees get their bonuses. It was very subjective and selfish. Fred was also wrong to accept this reason. It is his responsibility to put the safety of everyone before personal gain. He should have reasoned out with Wally about this. They should not have kept this reason from the others. Everybody else was under the impression that there was no other choice except to cut expenses. It was one of the key scenes when the Mexican Official asked Fred what he thinks if the point in which the mistake was made. It made the audience start to wonder and be aware of the turn of events. It was when the Mexican official asked if economic issues dominated the decision making of the project that Fred made a very unethical gesture. In this part, Fred denied being influenced by economic factors. It has been clear all through out the story that the restrictions were due to finances. It was clear that the characters understood perfectly the risks they are taking just because of money constraints. It is very much established in the Code of Ethics that engineers should be guided by the highest standards
The video Incident at Morales exemplifies how much the engineering profession affects everyone. It shows that engineering decisions can lead to deaths and should be therefore reasoned very carefully. The video has illustrated a variety of conflicts and tricky situations that professionals experience in the field…
From Goldsmith’s cathode ray tube amusement device, the video games have evolved a great deal to become the seventh generation video gaming that one sees today. Nintendo, a portable seventh generation video gaming that includes a series of play stations, mainly Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3 is the most sought after version today.
The pages of history tell us that the infamous Rosewood massacre was provoked by an incident of a black man raping a white woman. Needless to say, if the accused happened to be a white, the law would take its course, whence, it becomes evident that the offence, if any, lacked a rational basis.
Narrative Essay about a Frightening Incident. Every person has some qualities, talent, accomplishments, and experiences that make that person proud. In this paper, I would like to share one of my unforgettable experiences, which made me feel proud of myself as well as helped me realize the importance of the role a person can play in the life of another person.
It is surprising that an ICS was not in place at the time the explosions occurred. Details about the actual size of the depot are not available although there is the information that "a large fire engulfed 23 large fuel storage tanks over a high proportion of Buncefield site" (Assignment Brief).
In this respect, as illustrated in Lochgelly Iron and Coal Co v McMullan 1 "strict legal analysis" requires consideration for "the complex concept of duty, breach and damage thereby suffered by the person to whom the duty was owing". Thus, the claimants must illustrate a breach of duty by the defendant to illustrate liability, and consequently justify claims for damages.
It is this move to gain a competitive advantage that has created a channel for emergence of ethical issues in the course of construction of the plant.
In the course of manufacturing a paint remover that will match Chemitoil’s product, Phaust Chemical
This poem highlights the main cause of racism and talks about racism that has been deeply embedded in the society of United States.
The poem focuses on the experience of the poet and starts with his joyous
1 pages (250 words)Essay
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Incident of Morales video for FREE!