The side sticks reacted oppositely such that when the side stick on the right was controlled, the plane moved in the opposite direction and vice versa. After the plane moved to a height of FL120 the crewmembers noticed the abnormality and sought to land the plane safely for further checking. The maintenance organization group took over the plane and repaired the plane but did not realize the fatal error they did while trying to repair the plane. No damage occurred to the plane and no injuries occurred to the people on board. This paper discusses and analyzes the findings of the aviation investigation team and makes the distinguishing mistakes done on the plane by the teams handling the repair. Research Findings and Analysis The team investigating the fatal error first recognized that the plane was on maintenance two days even before the flight and the plane had indicated the problem. The problem affected both ELAC number one and ELAC number two. The errors were both visible through the computer transmission. The elevator aileron computer controls the back angle of the plane. The researchers found out that despite repairing the elevator aileron computer, a bent pin on elevator aileron computer number one was not replaced and not repaired. The investigation also reveals that during the repair of ALAC number one, the entire rewiring process was incorrect. The command and the monitor channels faced alteration when the technicians inverted the whole wiring system after getting confused on which diagram to use on the manufacturers manual. The wire connects the plug of ELAC to the plane for ease of monitoring the back angle of the plane and other conditions of the plane. Due to lack of enough experience by both the engineers and the crewmembers, the errors remained undetected and almost led to massive losses and death. Flight controlled check group are to be blamed for failing to realize the error. The report argues that the error occurred due to the following reasons. There was an unclear information about the planes diagrams that resulted to abnormal wiring of the control and monitor channels. The researchers believe that a wrong diagram caused the problem. The research findings also indicate serious differences between the manufacturers and the engineers on the maintenance. The report argues based on the data difference used by manufacturers and the maintenance team in correcting the errors of the plane. The findings also indicate that the unambiguous instructions from the manufacturer could have led to the fatal error. According to the report, the analysts argue that the insufficient functionality of the quality assurance services undermined the quality of the work done by the maintenance and the flight control checkers. This is mainly due to the two separate groups working distinctively separate failing to identify and notice the problem. The high authority members of the organization is also to blame as they did not pass their tests in ensuring that sufficient supervision and maintenance was done to the plane before declared fit for transport. The following defenses were broken while trying to correct the error on the plane. On 18th March 2001 when the pane signaled an error message on ELAC number two, the maintenance group ought to have corrected the mistake instead of doing a RESET. Another defense broken is that the crew passed the plane fit for travel while they had not fully corrected the mis
Airbus A320 Control Problem Introduction An aviation investigation team received a distress call from the pilot of an airbus A 320 which had just started its journey from Frankfurt main airport headed to Paris on the airport. The flight contained 115 passengers…
rbus in the market. Airbus has had a long drawn and illustrious history that has been marked by a lot of achievements which have changed the landscape of the aviation industry. Airbus was basically the child of a joint initiative between the countries of France, Germany and UK.
An organisational or workplace culture that is employee centred i.e. providing excellent benefits to the employees and performing deliberate efforts concerning towards the lifestyle of the employees would enable it to raise organisational effectiveness and most significantly can fulfil desired business targets.
(Mintel, Aerospace Industry Report, August 2001). The only two competitors in the large commercial aircraft market is Europe's AIC (Airbus Integrated Company) and the US Boeing Co.
Airbus can be defined as a trademark for a large passenger jet aircraft manufactured by aerospace companies from different European countries working together.
The pilot circled Long Beach airport to rid the plane of excess fuel before landing at LAX. The landing was made safely and none of the approximately 146 passengers and crew on board was injured. The incident was investigated by the Federal Aviation Agency (FAA) and the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB).
While the case deals with two prime industries Apple Inc. operates in, namely the Personal Computing (PC) industry and the MP3 Player industry, this report presents an analysis based on the PC industry perspectives.
The model used for the analysis of the competitiveness of
The next section will deal with the same.
Michael Porter has devised a framework which provides a better understanding of the industry and how companies can be affected by forces within the markets. The