StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Attempting to Elucidate the Opinion of the People Concerning Euthanasia - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The "Attempting to Elucidate the Opinion of the People Concerning Euthanasia" paper surveys twenty people to get their understanding and opinion about euthanasia. According to the survey, it is apparent that quite a several people have little understanding of euthanasia. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.4% of users find it useful
Attempting to Elucidate the Opinion of the People Concerning Euthanasia
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Attempting to Elucidate the Opinion of the People Concerning Euthanasia"

Euthanasia Terminal ailments and some other chronic diseases cause extreme pain and suffering to patients. In orderto alleviate this pain some palliative strategies have been developed through research. However, some diseases predispose patients to agonizing situations that are not only unbearable but also very disturbing to the people around the patient. In an effort to control some of these incidences, some governments have developed policies to allow euthanasia as an ultimate solution to pain. Such decisions have created massive criticism and complain from different quarters (Spack 23-27). I conducted a survey among twenty people in order to get their understanding and opinion about euthanasia. According to my survey, it is apparent that quite a number of people have little understanding of euthanasia and are adamant to embrace the practice. In an attempt to elucidate the opinion of the people and evaluate their propositions about euthanasia, a survey was done. The survey targeted twenty respondents who were required to answer fifteen questions based on the topic of euthanasia. To prevent any inconveniences to the respondents, the survey took approximately ten to fifteen minutes per respondent. The questions were framed in such a manner that one question led to a more deeper and specific question. The responses were brief, most of them having yes/no questions, while some required some brief explanations. No personal data was supposed to be provided in the survey forms in order to protect their confidentiality. The questions were brief, simple and clear so that the respondent clearly understands what the questions involved. Majority of the people interviewed have some basic understanding of euthanasia. Fourteen out of the twenty respondents could distinguish euthanasia and assisted suicide. The reasons given by the respondents about the differences were justifiable, a situation that demonstrated that they understood some aspects of the practice. The basis of assisted suicide as revealed by most of the respondents relates to a person wishing to die. In addition, it is not done to escape a painful and incurable situation. True to the fact that euthanasia is a controversial issue, most of the respondents believe that the practice is not ethically justifiable, nobody among the group stood for the ethical justification. However, lack of experience in having people who were willing to be euthanized among majority of the respondents revealed that, they didn’t really comprehend the magnitude of the situation facing these people. Only two among the twenty had an experience with an individual willing to be euthanized. Euthanasia is one of the practices that are common in the media. A whooping majority, seventeen out of twenty respondents confessed having never heard or read about the practice in the media. This presents the situation as minor, because if it were a major issue many would have read about euthanasia in the print media and heard through the electronic media. Euthanasia does not appear to be one of the emerging issues neither is it a problem that has been given a lot of attention. However, the fact that a few individuals have heard and read about the practice is enough evidence to reveal that Euthanasia is not any strange around us. Death and pain are resented aspects according the findings of the survey. The majority of the people was of the opinion that life is extremely important and should be protected at all costs. A substantial majority of the people said they would prefer having a person who helps another in committing suicide be prosecuted. In addition, they would not support a death sentence for such an offender but they supported the argument of the legal system handling the case appropriately. However, considering the sensitivity of the cases presented, a majority are of the opinion that euthanasia should be made legal in some cases. This proves the understanding of the people about euthanasia and the opinion they have towards unbearable pain and suffering. A simple majority opposes justification of the practice as an ethical practice. The rest are neutral about the practice being ethically justifiable. This further demonstrates the perception people have towards death. Some are not confident of expressing a strong stand on ether extreme while the majority prefers the practice remaining illegal under all circumstances. Individuals value life highly and would consider euthanasia as the last option. As depicted by the opinions of most of the respondents, doctors should use all possible means to prolong the lives of their patients including when they are suffering. The high value given to life is demonstrated here. Sixteen of the respondents were of the opininion that doctors should do their best to ensure the patients remain alive. However, there are some who are opposed, these people believe that some conditions should make provisions for doctors to terminate life. This stand is not common since the rest of the related questions seem to be pointing out that life should be valued highly above all things. Half of the people took the stand that there are situations that they would be willing to participate in euthanasia, three others were not sure, while seven were opposed to the participation. Approval of the practice was met with mixed reactions. The response to the question of approval of the practice if one of relatives wanted it was met with varying opinions. Half of the respondents could not approve while eight could, two of the individuals had no firm position. This reveals that even under painful conditions with one suffering from incurable diseases, a majority of the population would not accommodate the idea of having to perform euthanasia. To demonstrate the disapproval people have against euthanasia, only six out of the twenty could allow the practice to be done on them. These might have undergone through painful situations and do understand what it means to be under extreme pain and distress. Fourteen of the respondents could not imagine such a practice being done on them. Ideally, all humans love themselves; this is exemplified by the response they gave for the case of a relative. Despite the esteem life is taken with, pain and suffering is detestable. There appear to be individuals constantly supporting the practice of painless killing. Such persons have a likelihood of having undergone through traumatic events that resulted into pain or had an experience with a person under pain. Such situation leaves a person thinking that the best remedy would be termination of life, because this solves the situation for the last time. Fourteen of the respondents were in total agreement that there are circumstances that should call for legalization of euthanasia while only three individuals were opposed to the move. Some of them also said that they could allow the practice done on them, despite their small number their significance is felt. Much more than these would approve the practice if their relatives were involved. Comparing the life of animals to that of people draws the attention of individuals who love their pets more than they do even to friends. The first question on animals was meant to draw an understanding of how the respondents relate humans and animals. Surprisingly, a significant number, five, individuals said that both are equal. In the same line of thought, most of the individuals said that humans should be put to sleep when they are suffering. Reasoning using the arguments presented by the respondents, they are concerned with whatever the animals goes through just like human beings since sixteen out of the twenty have or had pets. Euthanasia seems to be encouraged by the respondents in this case, being among the last questions, the questions about the pets tries to bring the point of pain and suffering close home. It is evident from the results of the survey that most of the individuals would not tolerate pain but would otherwise consider euthanasia. In conclusion, the results presented by the study are quite informative about euthanasia. Firstly, it is evident that quite a number of the population, do dot know much about the practice. The survey acted as a revelation to most of them and the results were a testimony. Publicity of the practice is not well developed since few people claimed to have read or heard about the practice. Because of the fear of death, many people have divided opinion on whether they can embrace the practice or not. Works Cited Spack, Ruth. Guidelines Teacher's Manual: A Cross-Cultural Reading/Writing Text. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007. Print. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Euthanasia Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words - 1”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/english/1493132-euthanasia
(Euthanasia Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words - 1)
https://studentshare.org/english/1493132-euthanasia.
“Euthanasia Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words - 1”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/english/1493132-euthanasia.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Attempting to Elucidate the Opinion of the People Concerning Euthanasia

Euthanasia: Opinion Paper

The notion of euthanasia is more than just ‘pulling the plug' on a patient as described by Scott Peck in his essay titled “Living is the mystery”, who is of the opinion that euthanasia can only be justified if it is a decision taken only by the affected parties.... Public opinion on euthanasia oscillates between two extremes point of views that are either based on knowledge, personal experience or evaluation, but the subject has greater philosophical complexities that tie in the concept of living, pain and suffering besides 'death'....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Euthanasia and our civilization

The essay begins with a referral to James Rachels, who in his article Active and Passive euthanasia describes the moral differences between active and passive euthanasia.... Then throughout the essay, the ethical and moral issues of euthanasia are discussed.... This essay deeply goes into the understanding of what euthanasia is to the patients and doctors.... Dyck in his article An alternative to the ethic of euthanasia argued against all forms of euthanasia....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Discussing the Moral Acceptability of Euthanasia

Name: October 19th 2012 euthanasia euthanasia can be defined as the bringing about the death of a being for humane reasons, or as the killing of a person with the intent of ending his or her suffering.... There are two main types of euthanasia: passive euthanasia, which is legal in the United States, and active euthanasia, which is considered illegal, but it is still practiced by some physicians.... However, active euthanasia is undertaken on an individual only when his or her doctors and family members agree and make the decision to kill actively to end the agony suffered by their loved one....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Euthanasia

Quill made a wholly ethical decision based on his perceived perspective of attempting to promote the greater good and least harm in a completely un-ideal... Your Name Due Date euthanasia A Discussion of Case Study Everyone who is alive must eventually accept that no one lives forever, inevitably we will all die.... euthanasia, in all of its forms, is the intentional ending of or consciously allowing the life of another to end through action or inaction in order to end pain and suffering....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Legal and Ethical Issues Concerning Euthanasia

The essay "Legal and Ethical Issues concerning euthanasia" focuses on the critical analysis of the both the ethical and moral issues related to the current healthcare setting, personal and professional values influencing own stand on euthanasia, and ways of promoting health.... According to the Oxford English Dictionary, euthanasia, also known as mercy killing, is the act of inducing a gentle and easy death to patients suffering from terminal diseases that cause endless pain and are not manageable....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

Against the Legalisation of Euthanasia

euthanasia has been defined by some individuals as an act of murder and/or suicide.... Mildly termed as ‘assisted suicide', euthanasia is the final resort to terminate a person's prolonged suffering when all other medical, emotional and physical avenues for better health and better care no longer exist.... Legislative discussions for permitting active euthanasia in various countries have been repeatedly debated among their politicians, jurists, ethicists and even medical practitioners often resulting in drastic to insignificant or ambiguous changes in the concerned country's legal framework....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Analysis of Active and Passive Euthanasia Article by James Rachels

This paper ''euthanasia'' tells that James Rachels, in his article Active and Passive euthanasia describes the moral differences between active and passive euthanasia.... He has pointed out that the conventional doctrine about euthanasia is that there is such a significant moral difference between the two.... The third argument of Rachels is that killing (active euthanasia) and letting die (passive euthanasia) are controlled by the same motive: personal gain....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Key Ethical and Legal Issues of Euthanasia

The paper "Key Ethical and Legal Issues of euthanasia" focuses on the critical analysis of the main ethical and legal issues of the dilemma of euthanasia.... euthanasia is a practice that allows the deliberate ending of one's life to release an individual from pain or intolerable suffering.... This action can be undertaken by the patient himself or by a medical representative, When such a practice is done it is called voluntary euthanasia, however, when nothing is done to prevent an individual from pain it is called negative euthanasia....
12 Pages (3000 words) Coursework
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us