The paper "The Debate Over Legacy Admissions: Rationality Or Ideology?" describes the synthesis of the debate over legacy admissions. Overall, these articles demonstrate that, though drawing on facts, the debate about university legacy admissions is essentially political and ideological in nature…
USA Today (2007) notes that at Dickinson College (a liberal arts school), alumni provide 25% of its budget. Thomas and Shepard (2007) observe that in 2001, alumni provided 28% of the private donations to higher education, or almost $7 billion. Megalli (2007), on the other hand, has argued that these arguments are overblown, and that Harvard University earns an amount equivalent to alumni contributions through its $6.2 billion endowment in a little over two hours. At the heart of the debate, however, are the moral and constitutional arguments about the practice of legacy admissions. Megalli (2007) and DeKoven (2007) believe that legacy preferences undermine meritocracy, are unethical, and inherently unfair. USA Today (2007) and Thomas and Shepard (2007) disagree, arguing that a single standard of merit does not – indeed, should not – exist. Furthermore, Thomas and Shepard (2007) argue that admissions cannot be “fair” when the number of qualified applicants exceeds the available places. USA Today (2007) and Thomas and Shepard (2007) note many legitimate reasons for admitting applicants on more than academic scores: for example, to reinforce traditions, to attract gifted athletes, ensure broad geographic diversity or even “maintain a renowned a capella group” (USA Today, 2007, p. 232). More pointedly, Megalli (2007) and DeKoven (2007) argue that legacy admissions are racially discriminatory. Megalli (2007) cites a US Department of Education Office for Civil Rights (OCR) report on Harvard that found that legacy preference disproportionately helps white applicants because, as DeKoven (2007) notes, the playing field did not start to become even for persons of color and women until the passage of federal...
On the other hand, USA Today argues that pressuring universities to end legacy admissions for these reasons logically leads one to question a university’s right and freedom to reflect its unique character, to reinforce traditions, to control its autonomous financing, and to create a stimulating and diverse campus in accordance with the law. Thomas and Shepard further note that universities must also exercise their First Amendment rights, as summarized by Justice Felix Frankfurter, “to determine for itself, on academic grounds, who may teach, what may be taught, how it shall be taught, and who may be admitted to study”. The existing facts cannot settle this debate because the fundamental facts are not agreed upon, or and other facts are used selectively. It seems as though facts are mobilized to support pre-existing dispositions, related to political ideology, rather than to arrive at reasoned conclusions. Political references throughout all four articles suggest this to be the case. Most directly, Thomas and Shepard argue that the legacy admissions issue is a “smoke screen”, politically blowing a negligible issue out of proportion, while neglecting issues that have “vastly greater impact on vastly greater numbers of students”, government funding for primary and secondary schools, especially in poor school districts, where legacy admissions are not a primary issue. These articles do not provide confidence that this debate can move far beyond ideological and political commitments. ...
Cite this document
(“The Debate Over Legacy Admissions: Rationality Or Ideology Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/english/1699-the-debate-over-legacy-admissions-rationality-or-ideology
(The Debate Over Legacy Admissions: Rationality Or Ideology Essay)
“The Debate Over Legacy Admissions: Rationality Or Ideology Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/english/1699-the-debate-over-legacy-admissions-rationality-or-ideology.
dollar. This issue has been the object of much debate over the last few years. Thesis China, since 2003, has been manipulating its exchange rate to keep its currency undervalued. It has been selling its currency and demanding more of foreign currency. This policy kept China’s currency weak and supported its exports artificially by making them cheaper in the foreign market.
Kurds and the Debate over Stateless Nation The term ‘stateless nation’ refers to a unique group of inhabitants that has no land to legally occupy. According to reports, there are over 300 emerging national groups worldwide which propose regional nationalisms raising potential threat to many of the old nations and their political interests.
His role in the investigation is intended by his superiors to be as a liason between the people on the reservation and the FBI who have been viewed with some hostile suspicion. Apted's respect for his subject matter was evident in the film and in his treatment as he was the first film director allowed to film on a Sioux Reservation based on the trust he developed with his sensitive documentary, Incident at Ogala, a study of the real events of the murders that occurred.
Airport privatization is a significant part of the aviation industry and the participation of private sector in the development and operation of airports is quite a conventional notion world-wide. This approach for privatization of airport and facility development is increasingly relied upon countries who find it intricate to develop and maintain their own airports.
parents and students alike want to be part of the best universities and colleges; a good education has become the cornerstone to leading a successful life. Here comes in the question of legacy admissions and justice. Typically when speak of justice you would assume that all
The nature of health care provided varies from country to country. The worlds oldest universal health care system was initiated in Germany with the inclusion of the Health Insurance Bill of 1883 and Old Age
While Thomas and Shepard (2008) have supported legacy admissions by citing many reasons including their minimal percentage compared to merit-based admissions, the financial benefits the educational institutions get from them, the faulty logic of their critics and also by raising the philosophical question of what could be called the parameters of merit.
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic The Debate Over Legacy Admissions: Rationality Or Ideology for FREE!