The litmus test for any efficient law is that it creates a favorable and just society, while leading to a minimal wastage of the tax payers’ money. After seriously deliberating and pondering on the varied aspects of law, American values and the available statistics, I have decided to emphatically support the Protect Life Act. I strongly and reasonably believe that the American tax payers’ money should not be wasted on facilitating, funding and allowing abortions. It is not only contrary the time tested Western ethics, but also does not make a sound economic sense. Many people are perhaps simply not aware of the fact that abortion currently qualifies to be labeled a gargantuan problem for our society that is undermining its values and economy. Every year, 42 million abortions take place in the United States of America. This roughly amounts to a horrendous 115,000 abortions per day. Things will get clearer if one takes into consideration as to whom the people are having these abortions. 52 percent of the women resorting to abortions happen to be less than 25 years of age. (The Center for Bio-Ethical Reform: Online)). Moreover, of these, 20 percent happen to be teenagers (The Center for Bio-Ethical Reform: Online). Also, out of all the abortions conducted every year, only 1 percent are performed on women who are victims of incest or rape, and a mere 6 percent of these abortions are performed for reasons classified as potential health risks to the mother or the child (The Center for Bio-Ethical Reform: Online). Astonishingly, 93 percent of the abortions are carried on for social or personal reasons ((The Center for Bio-Ethical Reform: Online). The American society and the American tax payer certainly have ample responsibilities towards people facing health risks and those who are the victims of crime and abuse. But, going by the mentioned statistics, why should the American public be wasting its hard earned money on supporting the abortions of people who simply get carried away by the recreational aspects of their love life, without giving a serious thought to the possible outcomes of their irresponsible attitude. I am no way against unmarried people engaging in sex, and am all in favor of sex education. Yet, I also hold that as people are responsible for the consequences of their career decisions, financial decisions, they are also as much responsible for the outcomes of their coital decisions and choices. Hence, it is they who should be bearing the cost of their irresponsible acts and not the American tax payer. The other thing that needs to be taken into consideration is that is abortion simply a problem or also a symptom of a bigger problem existing in our economic system? Again, it would be realistic and pragmatic to resort to the available and credible statistics. Almost, 29 percent of the abortions are availed by women whose family income stands to be less than $ 15,000 (The Center for Bio-Ethical Reform: Online). 19.5 percent of the abortions are performed on women whose family income is between $ 15,000 and $ 29,999 (The Center for Bio-Ethical Reform: Online). In the case of women whose family income is more than $ 60,000, a mere 13.8 percent of the ab ...
Cite this document
(“In Favor of the Protect Life Act Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/english/38695-in-favor-of-the-protect-life-act
(In Favor of the Protect Life Act Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
“In Favor of the Protect Life Act Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/english/38695-in-favor-of-the-protect-life-act.
While some resulted in a change of regime such as in Libya and Egypt, the protests in Syria resulted in a civil war. The current problem has roots in the divisions in the Syrian society. On one side are the winners, which is the Alawi sect from the provinces.1 On the other are the disadvantaged Sunni, who are cut off from the state services, perquisites, and political privileges.2 Due to the regime’s custom to use violence to suppress uprisings, use of force was preferred in 2011 as well.
The author states that the healthcare reform has nationalized its system at the cost of $940 billion. Such amount is exacted from budget cuts, taxation and government funding. On a positive note, it was perceived to have reduced the national fiscal deficiency by $1.2 trillion. This was perceived as the strategic resolution.
Republicans campaigned with a promise to repeal president Obama’s health care law enacted on 23rd of March, 2010 that is expected to overhaul the health care system in the United States. These Republicans came to Raleigh to effect changes and began their action on the very first day of the session on January 26, 2011, that very day, the Bill titled Health Care Freedom, was introduced that was meant to overturn in North Carolina the “Obamacare” the famous health care reform by the president Barack Obama.
It was quickly accepted by Congress just a month and a half following the September 11 attacks. Pressure to pass anti-terrorism legislation prevailed over the need to understand what the 342 page Act entailed and the Act became federal law in October of 2001.
This Act enhances law enforcement by providing a number of investigatory tools. It aims to punish the perpetrators of terrorism at home and the world. This Act fortifies measures to prevent, detect, and prosecute the perpetrators of international money laundering and financing to terrorist activities (USA PATRIOT Act).
Somewhere in another place, there might be a young infant or a young teenager who is hoping, waiting patiently, for a heart transplant due to having a congenital birth defect or a hole in the heart. These stories are different, but the underlying cause of these individuals’ problems is one and the same: they require life-saving organ transplants.
Generally, people are always seeking ways to succeed in life, and in doing so, they encounter psychological phenomena that either gives them confidence of anxiety in pursuit of success. This makes people to rely heavily on emotions than rationality in pursuant of their interests, thus leading to unethical behaviors such as cheating and fraud that would influence their success.
Consequently, killing an infant that has been born-alive either by intention or by neglect may still be considered as murder. At first glance, the law may seem to address an issue that has already been resolved by moral and ethical
Pressure to pass anti-terrorism legislation prevailed over the need to understand what the 342 page Act entailed and the Act became federal law in October of 2001. Provisions of the Act violate the Constitution and tear down the freedoms for which true patriots
Though ACTA discernibly intends to protect the intellectual property rights, in spirit it happens to be preferential and curbs the human rights and the right to free expression of the free citizens (Dames 26). ACTA will
1 Pages(250 words)Research Paper
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Research Paper on topic In Favor of the Protect Life Act for FREE!