The word censorship makes people squirm and worry that they are being lied to, or that the government or other force of authority is trying to harm them. This is just not the case. In fact, what is usually called military “censorship” is in the best interest of our troops, our country, our government, and our liberty. …
This is just not the case. In fact, what is usually called military “censorship” is in the best interest of our troops, our country, our government, and our liberty. One recent example of this is the Wikileaks scandal where a large number of sensitive documents were released to the public. This release of censored material shows why censorship is actually a positive thing when it comes to military documents, as it has caused problems with military security. Furthermore, it endangered not only the lives of American troops, but of Afghan civilians and everyone involved. Wikileaks and other disasters have proved that military “censorship,” far from being dangerous, is a necessary part of keeping the country safe. In the middle of 2010 and the war in Afghanistan, a website called Wikileaks began posting classified documents from the US Government. In many cases these documents being uncensored “could put the lives of Americans and our partners at risk, and threaten our national security” (Jones). Although it’s debatable what intent the Wikileaks project had in fighting against what they perceived as censorship, their result was definitely harmful. As Assistant Secretary of Defense for Public Affairs Douglas B. Wilson put it, the “arrogance and naivete” of fighting against military censorship “have determined and had negative consequences for national security" (Miles). ...
Cite this document
(“Wikileaks Endangered Lives Saved by Military Censorship Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/english/43919-military-censorship
(Wikileaks Endangered Lives Saved by Military Censorship Essay)
“Wikileaks Endangered Lives Saved by Military Censorship Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/english/43919-military-censorship.
It also involves the surveillance, supervision and control of information or ideas that are promulgated in the society. Censorship has always been a hot topic of debate all over the world. It has remained a topic of heated discussions over the course of history.
Why Censorship is not the Best Option When it comes to Whistleblowers like Wikileaks and why Citizens should not have access to all Information. In 2010, Wikileaks made headlines after publishing several sensitive documents about Iraq, Afghanistan, the United States and many countries around the world (BBC News).
It was not until 1966 that the book was finally released to the public as its content was determined to be irrelevant and unsurprising. Since the banning of Cleland’s novel, censorship has been used to protect people from improper media according to the standards of the government and smaller organizations that focus on censorship, though this has sparked the issue of how much censorship is too much censorship.
Name Course Tutor Date Argumentative Essay Wolf Daniel argues that censorship was not all bad because nowadays, even though restraints on speech have been abolished, we live in a new age of social control where at one moment stupidity, ugliness, insensitivity, and offence are celebrated but the opposition from a respectable opinion is wrongly perceived.
hip is far more complicated than one person refusing to let another read or watch or listen to something. The sad, sorry history of the protests against the making and the release of The Last Temptation of Christ should stand as a shining example of how attempts at censorship almost always result in the opposite of the intended effect in the short run, though in the long run the intentions of those who desired to suppress the expression of free speech ultimately were realized.
ve topics, harmful behaviors or inconvenient practices in which these practices are not allowed by the government, media outlet or any controlling body composed of the influential people in a community such as church leaders, advocates or non-government organizations. It
Its activities are thus facilitating their capacity to cause major harm, should the security fail to be reinforced and the whole system of operations for the military and for the intelligence services fail to be