Social Insanity and the General Will Subverted in “The Yellow Wallpaper” and “Seasons of Madness” Insanity is usually understood to be a purely mental phenomenon, in which something is severely wrong with the sufferer…
This definition has to do less with the individual alone than with the individual in relation to the rest of society, and hinges around something similar to what Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Jacob Talmon discuss in their explorations of democracy. Both men are interested in what Rousseau calls the “Social Contract,” which is essentially the individual’s privileging of society’s rights over his or her own. Although this theory do not deal explicitly with insanity, its system of social understanding serves as a good model to explain the way society constructs its ideas of madness. These social constructions, and the submission to the will of the general population, can rob a rational, normal individual of their rights and life. Rousseau’s theorizing—and Talmon’s critical response to it—are less clear than they may be, especially when applying them to something other than politics. However, two short stories which show just the sorts of thing they are talking about are Gilman's “The Yellow Wallpaper” and al Shaykh's “Seasons of Madness,” which both show social constructions of insanity. In Gilman's story, set in 19th century America, the madness of her character is set upon her by society, but becomes debilitating and very real after she has been supposedly cured of her ailment. On the other hand, al Shaykh's story, which is set in a 20th century Middle Eastern society, portrays a madness chosen for more selfish social reasons, and which the character is able to set aside when she wants to. Regardless, both stories do show some of the dangers involved in treating madness as a purely mental phenomenon, and argue somewhat for an understanding of insanity as a social construction in some cases. Taken together, and when viewed through the political and philosophical ideas of Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Jacob Talmon, the stories make a convincing argument that insanity is socially constructed, and that this can be dangerous. In most cases, when someone is labeled insane by society it is because there is something severely wrong with how their brain works, or at least how it relates to reality. However, insanity could also be understood as an individual's refusal to fit himself or herself into the consensus of what reality should be. In “The Yellow Wallpaper,” this happens when the narrator constantly refuses to stop writing and using her imagination. In “Seasons of Madness,” it is apparent in Fatin’s pretended insanity, which she uses to distance herself from what her husband and family expects of her. In these cases, the individual's insanity is not so much a serious mental illness as a rejection of what society deems right and proper. This would suggest that the reason society as a whole puts those suffering from insanity into asylums may be to protect them, as well as society, from their own selfish rejections of the consensus view. On the other hand, as both short stories show, this idea is ripe for abuse: if insanity is not necessarily a mental problem, serious harm could be done to sufferers by treating them as if it is. The unnamed narrator in “The Yellow Wallpaper” ends up insane in truth where before she was just different to other people. Fatin at the end of her story is caught up in others’ perceptions of her as insane even though she has just admitted to being perfectly rational. Rousseau is the older theorist, and his “Social Contract,” written in the late 1700s, is considered by many a classic of political theory. In it, Rousseau famously described man as being “born free, and everywhere … in chains” (14). He argues that the way to help man be free in life is through the use of the “Social Contract,” ...
Cite this document
(“Madness: A result of individual rights being nullified by societal Research Paper”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/english/44254-madness-a-result-of-individual-rights-being
(Madness: A Result of Individual Rights Being Nullified by Societal Research Paper)
“Madness: A Result of Individual Rights Being Nullified by Societal Research Paper”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/english/44254-madness-a-result-of-individual-rights-being.
It has come to be viewed widely by the democratic western world as a system based on individuality and freedom of rights. Or more specifically, that everyone has a right to own private property regardless of his or her background or social situation. The division of labor created by capitalism is claimed by the capitalists to be beneficial to all of society; the freedom of competition allows for products on the market to be sold to the consumer at the lowest price and at the best quality.
The ten amendments in America were derived from the English Bill since they were considered likeable (Vile, 2003). Like other bills, the English Bills of Rights prevented the abuse of power. Additionally, it is also similar to other bills like in US since it describes the individuals’ rights to trial especially the Eighth Amendment (Vile, 2003).
The paper also deals with history or origin of human rights. The purpose of human rights is to ensure peaceful and orderly social and political functioning within a state. To safeguard interests of its citizens, several national and international bodies are formed.
Human rights are not separate laws adopted by governments of different nations, but these rights are a part of the constitution of several nations such as United Nations and several nations have signed agreements created by the UN to promoted human rights in their own regions.
This is explained by numerous violations of human rights in war and terrorist conflicts, as well as the needs of the globalizing world with lots of people moving to different countries. This paper explores the concept of human rights in relation to its meaning, origin, history, theory, and place in the contemporary world.
Just one of the definitions of rights according to law.com is as follows, "plural of right, which is the collection of entitlements which a person may have and which are protected by the government and the courts or under an agreement (contract)," (Law.com, p.1).
Human Rights can be understood as those underlying standards without which individuals cannot live in proper dignity as human beings. Human rights are specific moral guarantees that societies across the globe must respect as universal rights.
According to fundamentalists and orthodox institutions, homosexuality intervenes with the conventions of the piousness of marriage and also states that it would create anarchy in the society. Anita Bryant, the national
6 Pages(1500 words)Research Paper
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Research Paper on topic Madness: A result of individual rights being nullified by societal rights for FREE!