“Calling Machiavelli “a master of manipulation would not be far fetched, even if his methods may seem almost trivial. It is quite possible that the conversational voice is not a manipulative tactic at all, but it could be that his writings were for himself and he was expressing his internal thoughts on paper” (Christie para. 3). The authoritative voice is demonstrated through out the book. Another very noticeable quality of the book is the elevated language that it uses, it is certainly a book which is intellectually simulating and is of magnificent eloquence.
“Niccolo wrote The Prince at a time when the Italian politics was marred with blackmail, violence and conflict. In The Prince, Niccolo gives advice on how to be an effective and successful ruler and how to stay in power. The book was written as a practical guide to rulers that uses a simple and straightforward description in order to provide easily understandable advice” (Niccolo Machiavelli & The Prince para. 7). He is of the view that, “a prince ought to inspire fear in such a way that if he does not win love, he avoids hatred; because he can endure very well being feared whilst he is not hated” (Niccolo Machiavelli & The Prince). The Prince was groundbreaking because Niccolo described the world as he saw it. At Niccolo’s time period, any idea of freewill was very uncommon. Most other writers and thinkers considered almost everything beyond human powers. They associated almost all unanswerable events to divinity and destiny while Niccolo’s theories have their basis that the ruler must base his political policies on people’s true nature.
As, the writer and publisher, Rodney Ohebsion has to say, “In The Prince, Niccolo acknowledges the existence of two factors that play a role in determining success: Virtu, which can be described as skill, prowess, wisdom, ...
Cite this document
(“Prince by Sir Niccolo Machiavelli Book Report/Review”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/english/465384-prince-by-sir-niccolo-machiavelli
(Prince by Sir Niccolo Machiavelli Book Report/Review)
“Prince by Sir Niccolo Machiavelli Book Report/Review”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/english/465384-prince-by-sir-niccolo-machiavelli.
The book serves as a political guide for rulers and has been reputed to be a favorite of dictators like Stalin. The influence of this slim book is so profound in fact that a term ‘Machiavellian’ has been coined from it and has passed into common use.
The book was dedicated to Lorenzo di Piero de’ Medici, one of the great Medici ruling family. It is written in a clear and simple style in Italian, as opposed to the more difficult Latin that was the usual practice at the time, and has remained in the imaginations of people everywhere for several centuries.
He was employed in a great variety of missions, including one to the Emperor Maximilian, and four to France. His dispatches during these journeys, and his treatises on the Affairs of France and Germany, are full of far-reaching insight. On the restoration of the Medici, Machiavelli was involved in the downfall of his patron, Gonfaloniere Soderini.
Therefore, a good relationship between a leader and his people is the one that is never equal – the leader should always maintain that air of superiority, of being fearsome, in order to maintain order especially for statesmanship. Another point made by Machiavelli is that human nature can be very flimsy, as it depends on a person’s circumstance.
The following issues form the outline for the analysis: how a person's core beliefs about the nature of humanity influence one's leadership actions and attitudes, with specific application in the military; categories and types of power in organizations and connections between power and leadership; the influence of utopian ideas on leadership decisions in the past and how these ideas may influence leadership decisions today; the reasons why or why not a utopian vision can apply to a corporation or a unit in the military; the relationship between followership and leadership is discussed; and, how states of mind (including paranoia) can influence the organization's culture and the behavior of f
The trouble with Utopian socialism is that it does not involve itself with how to get there, believing that the influence of its own vision is enough, or with whom the mediator of the struggle for socialism might be, and, rather than deriving its principal from censure of existing situations, it pulls out its vision expedient from the creator’s own psyche.
The circumstances in which he wrote the book were not particularly favourable and the book was misunderstood with the ongoing conflicts and prevailing confusion of the day. He was well aware that he was plunging into a controversial subject which might be attacked by many and would give him a bad name.
Moreover, good armies are even more important than good laws, because 'it is impossible to have good laws if good arms are lacking', whereas 'if there are good arms there must also be good laws' (Machiavelli 42-3). The moral-put with a typical touch of exaggeration-is that a wise prince 'should have no other objective and no other concern' than 'war and its methods and practices' (Machiavelli 51-2).
Another point made by Machiavelli is that human nature can be very flimsy, as it depends on a person’s circumstance.Machiavelli’s The Prince is one of the most important books there are in the history of politics.
3 Pages(750 words)Book Report/Review
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Book Report/Review on topic Prince by Sir Niccolo Machiavelli for FREE!