The Aspects of the Family - Assignment Example

Q-Compared to Hugh's exotic life, Sedaris find his childhood dull, what is one downside, though, Hugh's experiences that Sedaris expresses “ most teens” don’t have to worry about because they leave their parents to provide. Hugh’s father was a diplomat, so he enjoyed all the luxuries one could think of, from travelling in a sedan to having a diplomat passport at the age of 3. Hugh’s family had houseboys to facilitate them. Hugh’s family was part of exotic parties on numerous occasions and there were more chances that Hugh's could come across a famous personality rather the David.

While the only problem he had to face initially was shelter. Although, Hugh mentioned that where I come from, finding a shelter is a problem that an average might confidently leave to his parents. It was just something that came with having a mom and dad. Q-Sedaris describes himself as a “petty thief”. What is he stealing? I’m just a petty thief who lifts his memories the same way I’ll make some change left on his dresser. When my own experiences fall short on my mark, I just go out and spend some of his.

Q-Catton employs both methods of organizations, subject by subject and point by point, wherein the essay does this switch occur( paragraph #)? Why does point by point work better at this point in an essay? According to my comprehension, the switch occurs in the 12th paragraph where the writer compares both the warriors in a single paragraph based on their single aspect of strength and valour. The switch was mandatory for the comparison between them in terms of common aspects which both cherished.

Q-How does the two men differ in the following areasa. background/ personal qualitiesGrant: patriot, favoured democracy, nationalist Lee: tidewater aristocrat, adamant in his approach, egocentric b. sense of individual privilege/ sense of region/ acceptance of change grant: considered fighting for the society in the broader concept preferred fighting for growth, expansion and broadening of horizons and creating opportunities. He was open to changeLee: considered fighting for the individual locality Preferred fighting for his beliefs, would endure anything but change.

Loyal to the locality onlyQ-What are the two ways they are similar? 1. Grant and Lee were marvellous fighters.2. Daring and resourceful3. Both had the ability to think fast and act accordingly4. The most important of all is that they both had the audacity to sit and sign the peace agreement after the war is over.