For analyzing a concept paper - Annotated Bibliography Example

Annotated bibliography for analyzing a concept paper Annmarie Howell Grand Canyon Debbie Graves English Comp 105 February 13, 2012Kagan, V., Rossini, E. & Sapounas, D. (2012). Sentiment Analysis for PTSD Signals. New York: Springer-Verlag New York Inc.Using online text-based posts, this puts together a framework that can detect “psychological signals related to Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD).” It goes ahead and explores some techniques that are being introduced such as ‘sentiment mining’ which can highly assist in detecting online posts that have PTSD-related signals, where they can then be flagged and referred to a psychologist’s attention.

This book is an exceptional one in this field as it explains a system performance that is real-time in its analysis. This is a plus for the book as many other books or literatures on this topic do not explore real time analysis as this one, in fact, most of them only explore the relationship between PTSD and the patterns of texts in archived documents. The author addresses a wide audience because apart from addressing the psychologist alone, it can also be used by the parents and family for the participants.

This is made easy by the inclusion of sample system architecture and implementation that can be used as an early screening tool for information on the participants that require close follow up. The book is also current with the official release date being April 2012 and all the authors are professionals with wide experience in computer science. Therefore, their work would be recommendable when used as a scholarly source. Wilson, J. & Thomas, R. (2004). Empathy in the treatment of trauma and PTSD.

New York: Routledge.This book looks into the lives of clinicians who attend to trauma survivors. The book further explains how in the course of treatment to these survivors it has been established that an emotional intensity and stress levels from the survivors affects this clinicians as they listen to their stories. The authors further explain that with respect to posttraumatic therapy, there are very few experiential studies relating to pervasiveness, dynamics and personality of the mental health expert’s empathic stress reactions related to exposure to trauma survivors.

The authors Wilson and Thomas carryout a study and provide data for effective management in a move to help those that are affected by empathic strain from their professions. The authors both having attained PhD levels in their studies can be viewed as of qualified opinion and, therefore, making their work credible for use in scholarly research work. Though the book was written in 2004, it cannot be termed as outdated since the information offered is still current and widely practiced. The book although not biased tends to touch on cases of severe trauma and graphic descriptions related to war crimes and torture.

Therefore, it is not the best recommendation for the weak hearted. The book is a good source of information but with the language used can only serve a limited audience of mostly those related in the medical field.Friedman, M. et al. (2010). Handbook of PTSD: Science and Practice. California: Guilford Press.This is a very useful state of the art handbook, which comprises of topics such as resilience, prevention and forensic issues. It is broad both in depth and breadth explanation review of latest advancements in understanding PTSD and trauma cases.

The book reviews the implications related to clinical practice and looks further into the status of the treatment ad assessment used and whether it is or not evidence based. The authors discuss in detail emerging and well-established medical, public health interventions as well as psychological issues in an effort to tailor make a treatment that suits different populations. The target audience is wide as it can be used as a reference for academic work, personal reference and for professional purposes especially in the medical field.

The authors are highly qualified with each holding a PhD and holding a post at the National Center for PTSD. Having been introduced in 2010, it can be termed as a reliable and current source of information. The authors do not tend to have biasness and it has been cited by a number of writers as a reliable, comprehensive and applicable source of information on PTSD.