An Assessment of Discussion Group - Essay Example

At the beginning of my undergraduate studies, I was divided into groups by the representative. Each group comprised six members and we were supposed to meet and carry out assignments and private studies together for the duration of our time at the university. Our group comprised three women and three men, and being the group leader meant that I had to assess and control all the aspects and work of the group. However, considering I did not know all members of the group at a close and personal level, and bearing in mind that I had to work with colleagues for an academic year, I had doubts about how we would work effectively and efficiently.

I knew all of the male group colleagues from prior interaction, and they were all capable of getting work done under some close supervision. The first person, from interaction in and out of class, I presumed to be organized, hardworking, and brilliant and could perform quality work. The second male colleague made the impression of someone who moves with the crowd, in that I knew if I could get the cooperation of the other members, he would also be inclined to contribute. While, among the female colleagues, two of them were already my friends, and seeing them in my group was a relief.

From our interaction, the level of commitment they each put in their work and class work assured me of support in any task we were to be assigned. However, the third female colleague, I had never interacted with a, but observing her and the way she handled herself, made me think she would pose a challenge in submitting any task assigned to her to research. Group assignments meant that we were to have meetings for discussions, individual research on topics, a compilation by members, revisions, and presentations for the class on the findings.

This implies that we had to spend quality time in the library doing research and discussing. In the course of our study, our group became among the highest-rated in the class in performing and coordinating tasks. This was because there was cohesion and mutual understanding of the group objectives among members in doing group tasks, thus, we were able to achieve high marks due to the quality of the work we presented in class, and the majority of our lecturers acknowledged the quality of work we completed.