Compare and Contrast - Essay Example

Information about Model 1 The best feature of this model is the compact size of its central processing unit; it looks more or less similar to a large hard-cover book with USB ports, as well as an optical drive, rather than a personal computer. Its design and small shape are deceiving, as within this small machine there is an adequate amount of power to keep up with other regular-sized systems. It offers a solid, “low-noise solution” (White & Downs, 2007) with an adequate amount of effectiveness, as well as speed to get the work completed.

Another exclusive feature is that it can be laid flat or on its side by the stand supplied with it. The major constraint of its size is the lack of upgrading capacity. Nonetheless, it should be remembered that the ability for upgrading is not generally crucial for business PCs. It has all the necessary elements, together with “Intel's Core 2 Duo E6300 1.83GHz CPU, 1GB of DDR2 RAM, an 80GB hard drive and a slot loading DVD burner” (White & Downs, 2007). The essential pre-installed Intel graphics chip will not be able to go well with games, but it is satisfactory for standard workplace chores.

It also incorporates Intel's V-Pro technology, a distant administration tool to handle business task forces. This is intended to let information technology staff have an easy access to the computer, regardless of what its state of fitness and in spite of whether it is on or off. This technology is still new, and despite the fact that it is great in speculation, it has yet to achieve any serious momentum. Its casing never becomes very warm and it is much quieter as compared to the majority of PCs.

Fan noise is negligible and the hot air produced gets blow out from the rear side, away from the user. The manufacturer believes that this PC is an environmentally friendly acquisition. Information about Model 2 This model uses the latest “Intel H57 chipset along with the Intel Core i7-860 processor” (Shelly & Vermaat, 2008) to offer a desktop system with a high quality performance, although at a more practical cost. This system in conjunction with the “4 GB of DDR3 memory” (Shelly & Vermaat, 2008) should let the PC to perform excellently in just about any sort of application together with the challenging desktop movie editing.

The system has a comparatively small 500 gigabytes hard drive, as compared to the one terabyte sized in the majority of similarly grouped personal computers. It as well includes a “dual layer DVD burner which is not uncommon for many desktops” (Shelly & Vermaat, 2008). The manufacturer creates this by presenting an extensive choice of customization preferences where users can put in drives with more capacity or add additional drives in either “RAID 0 or 1 arrays for performance or redundancy.

Blue-ray drives are also available. All of these options do increase the cost, of course” (Shelly & Vermaat, 2008). Graphics is, possibly, one of the weakest points of this model. The major cause for this is the comparatively tiny “350 watt power supply” (Shelly & Vermaat, 2008) that does not have a good deal of the performance considered necessary for the “high end 3D graphics cards”. “The default NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 graphics card provides a mediocre experience with support up to 1650x1080 resolutions.

Those wanting higher graphics