The author takes its cue on the courageous step being undertaken by the Canadian Heart and Stroke Foundation in banning junk foods, which the FDA and USDA are not bent on doing since they are allegedly being corrupted by food manufacturers. The article identifies refined and…
olic disruptor ingredients like hydrogenated oil, sodium nitrite, aspartame, homogenized milk fats, monosodium glutamate, sodium nitrite and the like that can cause brain damage, cancer, and diabetes. Third, processed foods barely resemble the nature given food that they are due to over processing, overcooking, preserving with chemicals, pasteurizing, homogenizing and even irradiating. Simply put they are dead food that the human body no longer needs.
This article presents two arguments: from the farmers and from the advocates of public health. The farmers insist that they have to feed the animals with antibiotics to keep them healthy and in order to keep pace with the demands of the U.S. consumers for cheap animal meat. Public health advocates on the other hand argue that such practice of farmers is giving breed to germs in animals that are resistant to antibiotic which causes deadly diseases to the consumers. The intervention of the U.S. government in banning the use of antibiotic in animals in the 1970s did not materialize. The FDA has outlined plans to phase out the use antibiotics for non-medical purposes in animals in the coming years has yet to be seen. The author showed why the use of antibiotics in farm animals was approved in the 1950s as well as the research conducted in the 1970s showing the bad effects of antibiotics especially on E. coli bacteria. The strong lobby from farmers and drug makers for the continuance of use of antibiotics such as tetracycline and penicillin after the result of the research was released forced the ruling of the FDA to ban these antibiotics to be ruled out. It will take some time before FDA will take its final stand on banning the use of antibiotics on farm animals. More statistics perhaps showing human deaths related to antibiotic-fed animals?
In this article, the author presents the research on antimicrobial coating for liquid and film containers being conducted by Tony Jin at the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Jin is ...
Cite this document
(“Food- Steroids. Anitbiotics. Sprays. Are food manufacturers killing us Research Paper”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/english/540341-food-steroids-anitbiotics-sprays-are-food-manufacturers-killing-us-annotated-bibliography
(Food- Steroids. Anitbiotics. Sprays. Are Food Manufacturers Killing Us Research Paper)
“Food- Steroids. Anitbiotics. Sprays. Are Food Manufacturers Killing Us Research Paper”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/english/540341-food-steroids-anitbiotics-sprays-are-food-manufacturers-killing-us-annotated-bibliography.
Only in USA 3.1 million head of cattle are slaughtered to fulfill the beef requirements of the country over 120 days, until September 2011 (U.S Cattle Feed, 2011) . According to the reports, two third of the cattle slaughtered daily, is being injected with steroidal growth hormones to increase the growth rate, weight and milk production by the use of some genetically engineered hormones.
A. Production cost is low. B. Food-animals are healthier and more robust. C. Supply of food-animals in the market is abundant. III. Public health advocates argue that food manufacturers are killing the consumers by using food steroids, antibiotics, and sprays in their manufacturing process A.
The article aims at demonstrating the need for launching of Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) Authority in Saudi Arabia. The article is based on the findings of a research by capitas groupinternational (n.d.), which showed that SMS comprise 90% of all businesses in Saudi Arabia.
Therefore, to implement a local diet, one needs to follow the guidelines proposed by Priebe (2011) in the article entitled “An Overview of the 100-Mile Diet” published online in ecolife. As noted, a local diet could be implemented through observing the following steps: (1) starting simple; (2) try to connect with local farmers; (3) endeavor to grow vegetables in one’s own garden; (4) when shopping locally, purchase in bulk and learn how to preserve; and (5) just take things in stride and relax (Priebe, 2011).
Thus, the memories of food upon which one is raised forms the basis for a person’s identity, and this identity is often based upon the kind of ethnic cuisine served in one’s household. As James states, what one eat sets one apart from others in the cultural realm.
Close to eighty percent of active pharmaceutical ingredients and finished drugs come from nations outside America. Importation of foods from outside countries pose a great risk on the health and lives of both animals and individuals in the U.S. according to a research carried out on the risks associated on food importation, it was discovered that a certain number of animals and people in America die while others suffer from serious infections obtained from some imported foods.
The authors have also marked few limitations of the article in evaluating wholesome purposes of middleware software in generating software applications for computing devices.
The author in this article provides an in-depth analysis of Middleware
The food manufacturers have their valid reasons in lobbying for the government not to ban the use of food steroids, antibiotics, and sprays in the food industry. The public health advocates on the other hand, have solid grounds to encourage
This research will begin with the statement that steroids are the substances containing a large class of organic compounds with a characteristic molecular structure with four rings of carbon atoms. The paper tells that antibiotics are medicinal substances used in inhibiting the growth of disease-causing microorganisms.
2 Pages(500 words)Research Paper
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Research Paper on topic Food- Steroids. Anitbiotics. Sprays. Are food manufacturers killing us Annotated Bibliography for FREE!