The Republican Presidential Candidate's Stand on Stem Cell Research Government funding for stem cell research has always been a explosive topic during the election season. This is because the topic tends to be in the cross hairs of the presidential candidate financial supporters…
This topic was once again brought to center stage because of Newt Gingrich's declaration as published in The Washington Post that he would ban embryonic stem cell research and also question the IVF practices (Tumulty, Karen, Gingrich Wows to Ban Embryonic Stem-Cell Research, Questions In Vitro Practices). His statement then led me to wonder about what the stand of the other 2 leading Republican presidential candidates would be on the issue. The answers I found were quite troubling. It would appear that save for Mitt Romney's limited knowledge of stem cell research, none of the GOP candidates actually understand the reasons behind the need to federally fund any stem cell research and as far as any of these candidates are concerned, scientific and medical advancements directly tied to stem cell research are a work of the devil and will not bring anything to our society. They believe that stem cell research is actually a method by which a child can legally be murdered by those around him. It saddens me to think that these candidates are so lost in their own world that they cannot see how stem cell research is actually a gift from science, not a tool of death. Through the years, the stem cell research debate has become one of the divisive arguments within the GOP. One which has their presidential candidates taking opposing sides, all with the intention of keeping their private and religious supporters happy and their campaign funds at a steady amount. However, the time has come for the Republican party to decide whether they are going to have candidates who represent the will of the people and the needs of many, or the religious aspect which is fast losing ground and support in an era when religious beliefs no longer hold as much power over the people as it did in the past decades. Of the three current frontrunners of the Republican party presidential race, two of them hold true and dear to their party standards while only one has chosen to be his own man and represent the actual will of the people on the issue. The two who stand for the traditional Republicans are Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum, while the modernist who sees the whole picture and not just party guidelines is Mitt Romney. With Newt Gingrich, the current 2nd placer in the GOP primaries declaring that he shall continue to prevent the further growth of stem cell research due to his misguided belief that stem cell research destroys an unborn child's life, he has shown the public the kind of traditional candidate that he is. One who does not see into the future and only lives in the past. A remnant of a political era long gone. This is a statement to be held as true since he declared to the flock of followers at the Baptist Church in Winterpark, Florida that: ... embryonic stem-cell research amounts to “the use of science to desensitize society over the killing of babies.” (Tumulty, Karen, Gingrich Vows to Ban Embryonic Stem-Cell Research, Questions In Vitro Practices) By making such a declaration, the public may be led to believe that should Mr. Gingrich be elected to the White House, the scientific and medical community will suffer a significant setback in the research and development of disease prevention and cure. It is easy to see why he would make such a declaration, he is after all a Catholic convert and is a staunch pro-life supporter as well. Mr. Gingrich's sentiment is one which is familiarly echoed by the 3rd ranked GOP presidential cand ...
Cite this document
(“The Republican Presidential Candidate's Stand on Stem Cell Research Paper”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/english/57241-free-topic-from-washington-post-newspaper
(The Republican Presidential Candidate'S Stand on Stem Cell Research Paper)
“The Republican Presidential Candidate'S Stand on Stem Cell Research Paper”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/english/57241-free-topic-from-washington-post-newspaper.
In that aspect, this paper is going to present in-depth research on stem cells and facts surrounding the stem cells. The paper will also analyze legal views of various countries concerning the stem-cell research. In addition, the paper will analyze various controversies that surround the stem-cell research alongside advantages and disadvantages of adopting stem cell research in the contemporary societies.
Stem cell research is particularly useful for patients suffering from hemophilia. Hemophilia is very complicated and stem cell research helps in curing it, there are other blood related diseases which can also be cured using stem cells this goes to show that we have made tremendous progress in the field of science and research.
The science of stem cell treatments, potentially as or more significant as these other innovations, is beginning a new stage of exploration and growth that could be the forerunner of unprecedented cures and therapies. The present enthusiasm over prospective stem cell produced remedies radiates from the new innovations of genetic biology.
Stem cell research in US has faced mixed reactions from the citizens and leaders. Federal law restricts funding and stems cells use through budget bill amendments (Vestal and Writer 2008). In 2001, US president George Bush signed a policy that limited the number of lines of stem cells for research use.
The science of stem cell medicine, possibly as or more important to humanity than these other advancements, is launching a new phase of growth and exploration that could be the predecessor of unprecedented therapies and cures. The current enthusiasm concerning potential stem cell-produced remedies emanates from the new genetic biology innovations.
Advocates for stem cell research highlight its benefits and they support the laws which have been suggested in its favor. Others are however not highly enthusiastic about its application within the current health system. As a result, many laws and versions of stem cell research legislation have been suggested throughout the years.
In addition, the paper will analyze various controversies that surround the issue of stem-cell research and analyze the merits and demerits of stem-cell research. The paper will conclude with an elaborate conclusion bearing personal view with regard to the stem-cell research.
It was in the year 1998 that the University of Wisconsin scientists developed the first human embryonic stem cell lines. The medical field is eager to explore this field because of the possibility of generating replacement tissues for cells and organs that are not functioning.
Stem cells are biological cells that have the ability to form new cells. Stem cells can differentiate into diverse, specialized cell types. These cells have been in the treatment of cancer, immunodeficiency diseases and other autoimmune diseases (Solo & Gasil, 2007).
The derivation of pluripotent stem cell from embryos and oocytes is apprehensive with disputes regarding the inception of human reproduction and human personhood. There are several ways of delivering stem cells however
8 Pages(2000 words)Research Paper
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Research Paper on topic The Republican Presidential Candidate's Stand on Stem Cell Research for FREE!