Ratings, Rankings, Results, and What Really Matters by Torraco - Essay Example

There are proofs from previous research that a gap allegedly exists between research and practice (Torraco, 2005). A proposed technique of bridging the gap was expounded through the discussion of Herbert Simon’s proposal. One strongly agrees with the author’s assertions that despite various monitoring standards which gauge the effectiveness of journals or articles published in authorized medium, what really matters is the ability of the journal to achieve defined goals in the most effective manner. In this situation, the HRDR emphasized the relevance of ratings and rankings; but also emphasized the value of its ability to provide validating outcomes to theories that are grounded in research.

Concurrently, one affirms that the ability to bridge the gap between theories and practice is relevant to test the reliability and validity of various research findings in contemporary HR settings. Thus, Torraco (2005) provided illuminating perspectives on monitoring the effectiveness of journals and publications through emphasizing what really matters to professionals and practitioners in this particular field of endeavor.